View Full Version : If the Melbourne Football Club was a contestant on Big Brother?
Would they vote themselves off :confused:
Dyslexic Emo
7 Nov 2007, 17:39
Maybe but only after placing bets and getting turkey slapped
If Hawthorn Football Club was a contestant on Survivor, they would drift away south onto a smaller island.
Would they vote themselves off :confused:
Only if there were gay Hawkers in the house... not that there's anything wrong with that.:thumbsu:
If the Essendon Bombers went on survivor Africa they would be stalked by a hyena
http://www.ditext.com/ardrey/hyena.jpg
dutchy12
7 Nov 2007, 17:41
Would they vote themselves off :confused:
Lol that is quite funny but the even funnier thing is 30% of supporters voted to have your only your clubs emblem on our guerney's pretty much making the non existant in the proposed melbounre hawks merger. at the least the 52% dissapoitning dees fans who did vote in favour of the merger knew they were absoultely ripping off your pathetic club
Oh wait....
http://www.geelongadvertiser.com.au/images/uploadedfiles/editorial/pictures/2007/09/27/Matthew_Knights.jpg
kirbatron
7 Nov 2007, 17:43
they'd be Kieran Tanner
Dyslexic Emo
7 Nov 2007, 17:45
Lol that is quite funny but the even funnier thing is 30% of supporters voted to have your only your clubs emblem on our guerney's pretty much making the non existant in the proposed melbounre hawks merger. at the least the 52% dissapoitning dees fans who did vote in favour of the merger knew they were absoultely ripping off your pathetic club
ROFL. Your not too bright are you?
If 30% voted for it that leaves a whopping 70% who didn't want it. Which shows that there were more than 2 times as many who didn't want it to happen unlike your mob who where pretty much 50/50 if it werent for the two bums you got to vote which swung it up another 2 percent
Lol that is quite funny but the even funnier thing is 30% of supporters voted to have your only your clubs emblem on our guerney's pretty much making the non existant in the proposed melbounre hawks merger. at the least the 52% dissapoitning dees fans who did vote in favour of the merger knew they were absoultely ripping off your pathetic club
What's even more funny is that 'MELBOURNEfc' 'supporters' tried to create an identity by merging...but in the process voting their history (there only call to fame) into insignificance
Melbourne is like the teenage boy that took 18 months to work up the energy to ask girl out, only to be flattely rejected :thumbsu:
We broke your heart didn't we :)
Mr Lizard
7 Nov 2007, 17:49
Lol that is quite funny but the even funnier thing is 30% of supporters voted to have your only your clubs emblem on our guerney's pretty much making the non existant in the proposed melbounre hawks merger. at the least the 52% dissapoitning dees fans who did vote in favour of the merger knew they were absoultely ripping off your pathetic club
It is quite a compelling argument you make:
'Most of our members voted yes. Most of our members are quite disappointing. Personally I wouldn't have minded the merger because then at least we could claim some recent success on the field. That's why I voted yes."
It is quite a compelling argument you make:
'Most of our members voted yes. Most of our members are quite disappointing. Personally I wouldn't have minded the merger because then at least we could claim some recent success on the field. That's why I voted yes."
The whole merger thing is a yawn but I'll say this:
How did negotiations get so far in the first place? Both clubs had extensive negotiations ultimately leading to an official merger announcement. It wasn't until Don Scot pointed out to the Hawthorn supporters what a bad deal they were getting that they woke up. Incidentally more Melbourne people voted in total than Hawthorn people which shows who were more passionate about their club.
The ironic thing is that since 1996 Hawthorn have made the finals 3 times and Melbourne 6 times so the whole success of Hawthorn thing has now become irrelevant. Both clubs can now move on knowing that the decision has been made and neither club are looking back... just some of the Hawkers on BF.
Mr Lizard
7 Nov 2007, 18:12
....since 1996 Hawthorn have made the finals 3 times and Melbourne 6 times so the whole success of Hawthorn thing has now become irrelevant. Both clubs can now move on knowing that the decision has been made and neither club are looking back...
mmmmm, yes you have been very successful. The 10 year 'Daniher dynasty'.:D
It is little wonder you claim not to be looking back.
http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/160/395524.jpg
'The only way is UP! The emblem for you and me now'
mmmmm, yes you have been very successful. The 10 year 'Daniher dynasty'.:D
It is little wonder you claim not to be looking back.
http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/160/395524.jpg
'The only way is UP! The emblem for you and me now'
I'm sorry mate, I am not sure what you are getting at. Are you saying Daniher was no good because he took us to the finals 6 times and a GF as opposed to 3 finals appearances by your lot:confused:
The Flash
7 Nov 2007, 18:34
Would they vote themselves off :confused:
They probably would, as the ones who would vote to keep them in would be barred from calling, as they were barred from voting in the merger debate.
This is what happens when you have a corrupt board.
Mr Lizard
7 Nov 2007, 18:38
I'm sorry mate, I am not sure what you are getting at. Are you saying Daniher was no good because he took us to the finals 6 times and a GF as opposed to 3 finals appearances by your lot:confused:
Yes, he was the epitome of success. You no doubt bask in this success daily.
I hear you can get the latest Melbourne premiership on dvd.:thumbsu:
Deenamite
7 Nov 2007, 18:56
Yes, he was the epitome of success. You no doubt bask in this success daily.
I hear you can get the latest Melbourne premiership on dvd.:thumbsu:
Better basking in that than your own sperm as a result of Buddy getting a possesion. Btw Hawkks getting quite obsessive. Get away from us you freak.
Yes, he was the epitome of success. You no doubt bask in this success daily.
I hear you can get the latest Melbourne premiership on dvd.:thumbsu:
Relative to the Hawthorn era (post merger talks) Daniher probably is the epitome of success:thumbsu:.
Frankston Rover
7 Nov 2007, 19:43
Daniher Premierships 0
Clarkson Premierships 0
Guess which one still has a job.
Mr Lizard
7 Nov 2007, 19:50
Relative to the Hawthorn era (post merger talks) Daniher probably is the epitome of success:thumbsu:.
Relative to what he accomplished, how did he keep the job for 10 years?
Relative to what he accomplished, how did he keep the job for 10 years?
What part of 6 finals and a GF don't you understand? I never said he was the epitome of success (those were your words) and obviously like any supporter I wish the club could have done better. However in the time he was at Melbourne we did a lot better than what the Hawks did by a fair margin but for some reason I find a Hawthorn supporter trying to argue the point. Obviously if Hawthorn were good enough to not have to sack coaches over the last 10 years we could perhaps compare coaches but alas...
Daniher Premierships 0
Clarkson Premierships 0
Guess which one still has a job.
That is the most stupefying comment I have read on this site. So by your logic perhaps Clarkson should get the sack since you don't have a premiership. Daniher's finals strike rate was 60% over 10 years, not the best but certainly not the worst.
Frankston Rover
7 Nov 2007, 20:28
Yet Daniher got the arse.
If he was so good, why sack the guy?
You said his record was "the epitome of success", so if he was so good, why is he still not the Coach.
You f**kwit.
Mr Lizard
7 Nov 2007, 20:35
Daniher probably is the epitome of success.
I never said he was the epitome of success
That is the most stupefying comment I have read on this site.
I don't think I need to say much here really.
The Flash
7 Nov 2007, 20:37
I don't think I need to say much here really.
He got you RandB.
You got him rattled now Lizard.
crawf_legend
7 Nov 2007, 20:49
Would you please welcome, evictee number 4, Melbourne Demons. (Geelong and North were evicted first, Essendon next):thumbsu:
I don't think I need to say much here really.
RELATIVE TO HAWTHORN IDIOT!!!!
I never came out and said he was the epitomy of success in the first place in fact I stated he was not the best but far from the worst. You were the one who used that term and I agreed when comparing to Hawthorn.
Congratulation you can spell and understand gramar now move on to comprehension.
Yet Daniher got the arse.
If he was so good, why sack the guy?
You said his record was "the epitome of success", so if he was so good, why is he still not the Coach.
You f**kwit.
Do you really need me to tell you?
ok, I'll try to explain it to you. Daniher resigned in light of the public announcement of a review of all departments of the MFC. In light of his decision the club decided it was best for him not to coach for the rest of the year. That is the basics of it. He was not sacked for performance related reasons.
Now if you seriously want to keep comparing the likes of Judge and Schwab to Daniher be my guest.
Once again since you (like the Lizard) think you actually have a point, I said relative to Hawthorn which you obviously knew. Now go and get ******.
Mr Lizard
7 Nov 2007, 21:13
ok, I'll try to explain it to you. Daniher resigned in light of the public announcement of a review of all departments of the MFC. In light of his decision the club decided it was best for him not to coach for the rest of the year. That is the basics of it. He was not sacked for performance related reasons.
Do you think the board publicly announced their impending review due largely to Daniher's performance?
Do you think they were more concerned with the membership department's performance, and were suprised by Daniher's resignation?
Did you vote yes?
Do you think Chris Judd gave Melbourne a lot more consideration than he did Hawthorn?
Do you think the board publicly announced their impending review due largely to Daniher's performance?
Do you think they were more concerned with the membership department's performance, and were suprised by Daniher's resignation?
Did you vote yes?
Do you think Chris Judd gave Melbourne a lot more consideration than he did Hawthorn?
Do you think that you have completely lost the arguement that Melbourne outperformed Hawthorn during the Daniher years?
Mr Lizard
7 Nov 2007, 21:22
Do you think that you have completely lost the arguement that Melbourne outperformed Hawthorn during the Daniher years?
Do you think he was successful?
Do you consider 'The Daniher Dynasty' the most successful Melbourne era of your lifetime?
Do you even know who number 16 is?
Do you think he was successful?
Do you consider 'The Daniher Dynasty' the most successful Melbourne era of your lifetime?
Do you even know who number 16 is?
I consider that he had his good points and bad points and that NO he did not epitomise success as a coach in his own right... BUT given that he took a young side to a GF and made 6 finals in 10 years MFC had a far better record than Hawthorn under Daniher all things considered that analogy could be used relative to Hawthorn's performance. I don't know how many times I have to say that he was not the best nor the worst. Now you have moved on to "The Daniher Dynasty" ffs, 6 finals v 3 finals now get over it.
This arguement really is flogging a dead horse.
Mr Lizard
7 Nov 2007, 22:02
This arguement really is flogging a dead horse.
I would have thought 'flogging a dead horse' an apt description of Daniher's last few years at the helm.
You did make the finals a couple of times there though.:thumbsu:
Deenamite
8 Nov 2007, 06:37
I would have thought 'flogging a dead horse' an apt description of Daniher's last few years at the helm.
You did make the finals a couple of times there though.:thumbsu:
More like paving the way for a series of young stars to make a mark in the coming years.:thumbsu:
Leather Poisoning
8 Nov 2007, 09:38
More like paving the way for a series of young stars to make a mark in the coming years.:thumbsu:
You can't shine shit, Deena.
Deenamite
8 Nov 2007, 14:00
You can't shine shit, Deena.
But Dean Bailey can. Next supercoach. :thumbsu:
Mr Lizard
8 Nov 2007, 14:03
But Dean Bailey can. Next supercoach. :thumbsu:
Bailey is unproven. But you are partly right, Melbourne are shit.
Leather Poisoning
8 Nov 2007, 14:05
But Dean Bailey can. Next supercoach. :thumbsu:
Just to make sure I'm not misunderstanding you here:
You just said that Dean Bailey can shine shit?
Deenamite
8 Nov 2007, 19:22
Bailey is unproven. But you are partly right, Melbourne are shit.
Just to make sure I'm not misunderstanding you here:
You just said that Dean Bailey can shine shit?
And turn it into gold. The man does everything. Maybe he could turn your jumper into all gold?
Mr Lizard
8 Nov 2007, 19:28
So leaving aside what Dean Bailey might or might not do...
You agree that Melbourne are shit then?
Deenamite
8 Nov 2007, 20:40
So leaving aside what Dean Bailey might or might not do...
You agree that Melbourne are shit then?
No. We had a bad year.