DeadlyAkkuret
13 Nov 2007, 15:13
I found this interesting article on Fox Sports, but a few parts of it really had be confused.
http://blogs.foxsports.com.au/cricket/index.php/foxsports/comments/has_australia_really_moved_on/
Again, Lee was very good, but, with other members of the attack not always pulling their weight at the same time, Australia’s fifth bowling option suddenly became something of an issue.
So, in a nutshell, when a few of our top 4 strike bowlers struggled, there was more pressure on the 5th bowling option. Am i missing something or would that be the case for most nations?
And this...
Whether the depth in Australia’s bowling is as strong as in its batting will be revealed when Lee or Clark, or both, have off days.
So, to prove ourselves, we have to dominate when our two best bowlers have a bad day? I'm sorry but that's BS in my opinion. If those two have an off day at the same time, then we'll probably struggle, it's as simple as that.
Will the cricketing world be clutching at straws forever?
http://blogs.foxsports.com.au/cricket/index.php/foxsports/comments/has_australia_really_moved_on/
Again, Lee was very good, but, with other members of the attack not always pulling their weight at the same time, Australia’s fifth bowling option suddenly became something of an issue.
So, in a nutshell, when a few of our top 4 strike bowlers struggled, there was more pressure on the 5th bowling option. Am i missing something or would that be the case for most nations?
And this...
Whether the depth in Australia’s bowling is as strong as in its batting will be revealed when Lee or Clark, or both, have off days.
So, to prove ourselves, we have to dominate when our two best bowlers have a bad day? I'm sorry but that's BS in my opinion. If those two have an off day at the same time, then we'll probably struggle, it's as simple as that.
Will the cricketing world be clutching at straws forever?