View Full Version : Players in the AFL that have kicked more goals than Matthew Lloyd picture thread
DapperDon
27 Nov 2007, 13:36
End of Thread:thumbsu:
Well you have... um no not him. Actually... What about ... nah, damn this is a tough one.
tigerboyz
27 Nov 2007, 13:41
http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2006/07/21/lockett3_gallery__264x400.jpg
Roughie
27 Nov 2007, 13:42
http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2006/07/21/lockett3_gallery__264x400.jpg
Wow that is a very rare photo......Plugger in a LIBRARY :eek:
Bombers 2003
27 Nov 2007, 17:29
Wow that is a very rare photo......Plugger in a LIBRARY :eek:
Would Hankford KNOW what a book looks like?
Yellowandblack10
27 Nov 2007, 17:41
dunno, but here's someone who comes dangerously close...
http:///www.fullpointsfooty.net/images/Highflier.jpg
Hawkamania!
27 Nov 2007, 17:54
http://www.buytheg.com.au/catalog/images/000030.jpg
http://www.fullpointsfooty.net/images/dunstall.jpg
http://www.fullpointsfooty.net/images/dwade.jpg
http://www.australianrules.com.au/image/garyablett.jpg
http://mm.afl.com.au/afl_archive/cp2/c2/webi/article/176894ar.jpg
http://www.mcg.org.au/content/image/00001135-image.jpg
http://www.fullpointsfooty.net/images/mckenna.jpg
And these guys (along with Lockett) did it without acting for free kicks over a dozen times a game.
I will give Matthew Lloyd some credit, he is the best diver in AFL history.
Of course none of those listed above are in the AFL, apart from Richo, so the answer still remains as
http://www.zerolive.com/i/zero-live-logo-small.jpg
Carn Hawkas
27 Nov 2007, 18:18
Buddy will kick more goals in the long run :P
Of course none of those listed above are in the AFL, apart from Richo, so the answer still remains as
http://www.zerolive.com/i/zero-live-logo-small.jpg
Is that why Garry Ablett has an AFL logo on his jumper?
Ben the Gooner
27 Nov 2007, 18:41
Buddy will kick more goals in the long run :P
Lloyd's got a better goal to game ratio, and a two year ban will hurt anyone chasing a record.
Is that why Garry Ablett has an AFL logo on his jumper?
Read slowly and try to comprehend as you go Shotta.
Of course none of those listed above are in the AFL, apart from Richo, so the answer still remains as
Not were in the AFL, are in the AFL
Here i will help you.
By saying none of those ARE in the AFL, means they are not currently in the AFL.
If i had of said none of those WERE in the AFL, you would be right, rare for you, but could actually happen one day.
So of course the answer remains
http://www.zerolive.com/i/zero-live-logo-small.jpg
Of course none of those listed above are in the AFL, apart from Richo, so the answer still remains as
http://www.zerolive.com/i/zero-live-logo-small.jpg
Read slowly and try to comprehend as you go Shotta.
Not were in the AFL, are in the AFL
Here i will help you.
By saying none of those ARE in the AFL, means they are not currently in the AFL.
If i had of said none of those WERE in the AFL, you would be right, rare for you, but could actually happen one day.
So of course the answer remains
http://www.zerolive.com/i/zero-live-logo-small.jpg
Players in the AFL actually refers to AFL records. If you had of said current players or players still playing you would look less stupid. Therefore you stand corrected.
End of Thread:thumbsu:
It's time for bed, Lloydy.
Knighta wants you to lead the boys on a 10km run at 6am tomorrow.
PoidaCat
27 Nov 2007, 20:09
Anyone tell me players that dive more or are softer than The Velvet Sledgehammer? :confused:
http://www.zerolive.com/i/zero-live-logo-small.jpg
Thanks Merv! :thumbsu::)
Big Ronnie
27 Nov 2007, 20:09
http://galleries.lycos.co.uk/d/17927-4/ron-jeremy.jpg:D
DOCKER MAN
27 Nov 2007, 20:13
What about the players in the afl who have worn their pants up to their nipples as many times as mathew lloyd thread?
PoidaCat
27 Nov 2007, 20:14
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v418/poidaobi/lollloyd.jpg
DapperDon
27 Nov 2007, 20:28
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v418/poidaobi/lollloyd.jpg
that's scary!
Players in the AFL actually refers to AFL records. If you had of said current players or players still playing you would look less stupid. Therefore you stand corrected.
Players in the AFL refers to players currently playing.
Players that were in the AFL, refers to past players.
If i had of wanted to refer to past players i would have done so.
Of course there would be no need to as the topic is "Players in the AFL that have kicked more goals than Matthew Lloyd picture thread"
None of the above are IN the AFL yet WERE in the AFL.
That's why i said read it slowly mate, easier for you to comprehend.
Players in the AFL refers to players currently playing.
Players that were in the AFL, refers to past players.
If i had of wanted to refer to past players i would have done so.
Of course there would be no need to as the topic is "Players in the AFL that have kicked more goals than Matthew Lloyd picture thread"
None of the above are IN the AFL yet WERE in the AFL.
That's why i said read it slowly mate, easier for you to comprehend.
Hey dipshit it is had have, not had of. I hope you don't give out too many more English lessons. :thumbsu:
Ben the Gooner
28 Nov 2007, 19:07
Hey dipshit it is had have, not had of. I hope you don't give out too many more English lessons. :thumbsu:
Can't touch his point, though.
Personally, I'd have had a comma after hey, and after dipshit. But who takes any notice of spelling and grammar on a footy website? Oh.
skipjack
28 Nov 2007, 19:41
Can't touch his point, though.
Personally, I'd have had a comma after hey, and after dipshit. But who takes any notice of spelling and grammar on a footy website? Oh.
One is supposed to place two spaces after a full stop. Like that.
Ben the Gooner
28 Nov 2007, 19:45
One is supposed to place two spaces after a full stop. Like that.
Only if one is from the 1420s.