View Full Version : Markovic
philhawk
11 Dec 2007, 22:37
A lot of people on this Board who know more about the going-on's of Box Hill than I do seem to be upset at the fact we didn't re-rookie Markovic.
Was he really that impressive a prospect? I'm hazy over the details - but why did we delist him?
Rexcellent
11 Dec 2007, 23:16
A lot of people on this Board who know more about the going-on's of Box Hill than I do seem to be upset at the fact we didn't re-rookie Markovic.
Was he really that impressive a prospect? I'm hazy over the details - but why did we delist him?
injuries, shockin run with em, havent seem much of him at BH this yr, but performed well
bigbol069
12 Dec 2007, 08:46
A lot of people on Bigfooty repeat what only a few actually believe. No disrespect to the big guy but he didn't show anywhere near enough to warrant a second time rookie pick, blame injuries or whatever you like, that's the way it is with footy. Add to that the fact that all the kids picked up yesterday are a couple of years younger than him and are massively talented which is what it comes down to in the end.
FriarTuck
12 Dec 2007, 09:07
Add to that the fact that all the kids picked up yesterday are a couple of years younger than him and are massively talented which is what it comes down to in the end.
Massively talented may be a big call.
Marko is a touch slow and a touch short but is no slouch. He looks like he has the frame that could bulk up. Given he is a bit older and considering where our list is at I thought that would have been a plus.