Smoky
9 Mar 2008, 16:33
On a thread on the AFL board an administrator threatened that any more personal cracks on the thread would be carded.
The threat came after a Collingwood fan copped a barrage from numerous clubs that had completely gone off the topic and he started to defend himself accordingly.
After this there was more personal cracks thrown at Collingwood and myself (yes... I know your worried, I'm OK!) and I pointed out to the administrator that his rules had been broken... yet, he did nothing (and again were broken 3 - 4 times all up) and eventually he just closed the thread, ignoring the rules that he had implemented because, well it was his own supporters that had broken his rules. He arogantly closed the thread by saying "yawn", ignoring the rules he had set because it didnt suit him.
I pose this question to Collingwood Bigfooty members:- Do some of Big Footy's Administrators use their power on the site to purely increase their own debating powers instead of consistantly uphold the standards they claim to?
(Im know I'm in the s*** for starting this thread... but no names were mentioned, and if I have to stick to a set of rules i think its only fair it be an even playing field)
P.S:- It was nice knowing you... (probably!)
The threat came after a Collingwood fan copped a barrage from numerous clubs that had completely gone off the topic and he started to defend himself accordingly.
After this there was more personal cracks thrown at Collingwood and myself (yes... I know your worried, I'm OK!) and I pointed out to the administrator that his rules had been broken... yet, he did nothing (and again were broken 3 - 4 times all up) and eventually he just closed the thread, ignoring the rules that he had implemented because, well it was his own supporters that had broken his rules. He arogantly closed the thread by saying "yawn", ignoring the rules he had set because it didnt suit him.
I pose this question to Collingwood Bigfooty members:- Do some of Big Footy's Administrators use their power on the site to purely increase their own debating powers instead of consistantly uphold the standards they claim to?
(Im know I'm in the s*** for starting this thread... but no names were mentioned, and if I have to stick to a set of rules i think its only fair it be an even playing field)
P.S:- It was nice knowing you... (probably!)