View Full Version : Round 6 team v West Coast
.M a t t.
23 Apr 2008, 19:23
On the news they stated that Brian Lake has recovered, Scott West will be back but Johnno is doubtful
stmookeyj
23 Apr 2008, 19:25
If he's recovered I wonder how opposition fans will think of that.
addorable
23 Apr 2008, 19:26
If he's recovered I wonder how opposition fans will think of that.
who gives a shit what opposition fans think
Slash_LP
23 Apr 2008, 20:01
who gives a shit what opposition fans think
Couldn't have been put better.
lancaster
23 Apr 2008, 20:25
If he's recovered I wonder how opposition fans will think of that.
FFS who gives a rat's!!!!
Can we get over this already.
brian lake is a dog.
a bulldog player.
Black JuJu
23 Apr 2008, 20:27
If he's recovered I wonder how opposition fans will think of that.
It's a Christmas Mircale!! :D
boydsno1
23 Apr 2008, 20:47
looks like the magic spray we borrowed from melbourne victory works.
I don't think that West Coast fans are really in any position to make comments about Bulldogs players, given some of the antics that their own players have got up to in recent history. In fact, if I was a West Coast fan then I wouldn't even be daring to show my face around here.
FiveStrings
23 Apr 2008, 21:07
I don't think that West Coast fans are really in any position to make comments about Bulldogs players, given some of the antics that their own players have got up to in recent history. In fact, if I was a West Coast fan then I wouldn't even be daring to show my face around here.
Yes how dare we come on your board and make jocular remarks about your players? Shame on us.:rolleyes:
Vulture
23 Apr 2008, 21:10
Yes how dare we come on your board and make jocular remarks about your players? Shame on us.:rolleyes:
I'm still trying to figure out what a christmas mircale is!
Black JuJu
23 Apr 2008, 21:14
ha, it's a poorly spelt Christmas Miracle. ;)
Slash_LP
23 Apr 2008, 21:35
Yes how dare we come on your board and make jocular remarks about your players? Shame on us.:rolleyes:
Great, this board use to be relatively drug free.
Great, this board use to be relatively drug free.
Huge assumption.
Slash_LP
23 Apr 2008, 22:27
Huge assumption.
Maybe, although the % has certainly gone up.
lindsay_bulldogs
23 Apr 2008, 22:29
Need Johno at 100%. Really makes a difference having a fit Johno.
Obeanie1
24 Apr 2008, 14:28
IMO this is a danger game for the Dogs.
Dogs are playing quite well and in the past weeks the Eagles have played ok in patches but no where near a 4 qrter effort.
The Eagles looked disinterested at times, had no spark and dropped their heads at every goal kicked against them. They need something to fire up the passion in their bellies...........mmmmmmmmmmmm
Like a big mouth Akermanis to say something else stupid!!!!!!!
I noticed an article today stated that Aker named over half a dozen players in four teams who he suspected used performance enhancing drugs, and more than one Eagle.
I won't be surprised to see a more interested and fired up Eagles side this Sat night, every round has an upset or two and this could be one of them.:thumbsu:
Johnno_6
24 Apr 2008, 14:34
IMO this is a danger game for the Dogs.
Dogs are playing quite well and in the past weeks the Eagles have played ok in patches but no where near a 4 qrter effort.
The Eagles looked disinterested at times, had no spark and dropped their heads at every goal kicked against them. They need something to fire up the passion in their bellies...........mmmmmmmmmmmm
Like a big mouth Akermanis to say something else stupid!!!!!!!
I noticed an article today stated that Aker named over half a dozen players in four teams who he suspected used performance enhancing drugs, and more than one Eagle.
I won't be surprised to see a more interested and fired up Eagles side this Sat night, every round has an upset or two and this could be one of them.:thumbsu:
Only if the Eagles are still "flying high".
Anthony_
24 Apr 2008, 16:01
Only if the Eagles are still "flying high".
True is almost if they are "Comming Down"
Dogs_R_Us
24 Apr 2008, 16:13
Is this the face-off thread? ;)
Bodicifer
24 Apr 2008, 16:45
Every game is a danger game for the dogs and we know we need to put in a 4 quarter effort. The simple equation is that if we put in a 4 quarter effort then we will win nearly every game. It is only when our running and effort drops that we look susceptible. Take Geelong and Hawthorn out of the equation and I don't see another team being able to beat us unless we are not putting in for 4 quarters.
At least this year Melbourne airport security sniffer dogs can spend more time checking out other flight arrivals than the WC plane !;):D
stefoid
24 Apr 2008, 17:57
Every game is a danger game for the dogs and we know we need to put in a 4 quarter effort. The simple equation is that if we put in a 4 quarter effort then we will win nearly every game. It is only when our running and effort drops that we look susceptible. Take Geelong and Hawthorn out of the equation and I don't see another team being able to beat us unless we are not putting in for 4 quarters.
At least this year Melbourne airport security sniffer dogs can spend more time checking out other flight arrivals than the WC plane !;):D
I actually fear Sydney more than the other two teams. Our midfield is better than the hawks, and I think we can match geelong if we are on song, but Sydney we have not beat in simply ages.
Walsh Bay
24 Apr 2008, 18:02
Out of curiosity Stefoid, why is our midfield better than Hawthorn's?
Obeanie1
26 Apr 2008, 14:54
Only if the Eagles are still "flying high".
Are they????????
Why don't you go as Aker for his opinion:D
What:eek:..........Aker is going to keep his mouth shut..............
Yer riiiiight.........just reading his appology and crickey he too the long road home to get it out.
Anyhow.......I have a feeling in the Force that a close upset is on the cards:D
Anyhow.......I have a feeling in the Force that a close upset is on the cards:D
Agree. I reckon the Doggies will get up:thumbsu: