View Full Version : Which Cornes?
Juddernaut08
26 Apr 2008, 19:41
dumb poll. chad is clearly the stand-out.
Power King
26 Apr 2008, 19:45
I think a better discussion would be for who people think is better between the Burgoynes.
I voted Chad, though I think he makes Kane appear underrated. Having said that, the role that Kane plays in the team is probably gonna make him underrated anyway, as he doesn't do the flashy stuff.
Juddernaut08
26 Apr 2008, 19:48
Yeh the burgoyne's are tough to separate.
Ppl rate shaun coz he's in the mould of Judd and the other break-neck middies. however he's so inconsistent; and he often goes missing in games.
Peter is much more consistent; and at his best can rack up disposals as much as anybody. however he does lack the explosiveness his brother has.
they are both good...
but Chad is the biggest cocky mother f***** i have ever seen.
if i had a hit list of AFL players, he would be no.1
cbreban
27 Apr 2008, 03:28
they are both good...
but Chad is the biggest cocky mother f***** i have ever seen.
if i had a hit list of AFL players, he would be no.1
Yeah... and I'm sure he'd be shitting himself at the sight of you :rolleyes:
Port_Magic
27 Apr 2008, 20:39
Both good players. I voted for Chad. Kane is good but his posessions just seem to be average. Chad's posessions always seem to count. The fact that he can play almost any position and that he can win the game by himself gets him #1 for me
bloodpumpsRnB
28 Apr 2008, 06:39
Chad is a very unique player. Kane is a very good midfielder but not a standout like Chad.