View Full Version : I feel for the Kangas...
keefriffhard
17 May 2008, 14:57
You've got to have some pity for North. Hardly any tickets have been pre-sold for tonight's game and even they admit that there'll be a crap turnout at Carrara. However you couldn't help but wonder how things would have gone with some fixturing help.
Undoubtedly the fact that they are playing the Eagles is a massive blow and is more than just a minor contribution to the low figures. Playing against a side with one win from seven games is hardly an inspiration for spectators. Especially with a forward line as functional as the reactors as Chernobyl - a fact born out by a horribly woeful percentage of only 66. In fact they are only seperated from the horrifically performed Demons and bottom spot by 6%.
Personally, being a neutral supporter, I wouldn't turn up to watch that rubbish either. :thumbsd:
Hodge2Franklin
17 May 2008, 14:59
The AFL admitting it was a fixturing error was a very poor attempt at hiding their obvious payback. The Kangas should be compensated for this game.
Braun_2_B_Wild
17 May 2008, 14:59
Yeah they should have played it in Melbourne instead and had 5,000 people turn up :thumbsu: :D
keefriffhard
17 May 2008, 15:03
Yeah they should have played it in Melbourne instead and had 5,000 people turn up :thumbsu: :D
People wouldn't turn up to watch your rabble down here either...
Boozeroo
17 May 2008, 15:47
I'd check the poor attendance for the 'Game of the round' at Launceston before you blame the Roos for the AFL's fixturing mistake.
Spartan
17 May 2008, 16:24
People wouldn't turn up to watch your rabble down here either...
Whats the average attendance of Hawks home games compared to the Eagles home games this year?
Spartan
17 May 2008, 16:27
You've got to have some pity for North. Hardly any tickets have been pre-sold for tonight's game and even they admit that there'll be a crap turnout at Carrara. However you couldn't help but wonder how things would have gone with some fixturing help.
Undoubtedly the fact that they are playing the Eagles is a massive blow and is more than just a minor contribution to the low figures. Playing against a side with one win from seven games is hardly an inspiration for spectators. Especially with a forward line as functional as the reactors as Chernobyl - a fact born out by a horribly woeful percentage of only 66. In fact they are only seperated from the horrifically performed Demons and bottom spot by 6%.
Personally, being a neutral supporter, I wouldn't turn up to watch that rubbish either. :thumbsd:
You guys should understand that quite well, with your 70 percentage in 2004 when you went within 1% of another wooden spoon. :thumbsu:
keefriffhard
17 May 2008, 17:16
I'd check the poor attendance for the 'Game of the round' at Launceston before you blame the Roos for the AFL's fixturing mistake.
I know you North supporters struggle with your reading, but the OP actually absolves you of a fair amount of the blame for a poor attendance tonight. As I said, not many people want to turn up to see the awesome machine that is West Coast at the moment.
keefriffhard
17 May 2008, 17:19
You guys should understand that quite well, with your 70 percentage in 2004 when you went within 1% of another wooden spoon. :thumbsu:
Surely you'd be one of those who'd imply that in 2004 we were tanking for picks. And we still had a higher percentage than your mob in '08 when they're giving it their best shot.
Thank God for Melbourne eh.
Anti Gold Coast
17 May 2008, 17:20
Surely you'd be one of those who'd imply that in 2004 we were tanking for picks. And we still had a higher percentage than your mob in '08 when they're giving it their best shot.
Thank God for Melbourne eh.
The funniest thing is that in all likelihood, the Hawks may have taken Delidio with their first pick, had they finished last.
I feel for the Kangaroos too... they may lose tonight. :) Just kidding.
Boozeroo
17 May 2008, 17:28
I know you North supporters struggle with your reading, but the OP actually absolves you of a fair amount of the blame for a poor attendance tonight. As I said, not many people want to turn up to see the awesome machine that is West Coast at the moment.
"You've got to have some pity for North."???
When we want your pity, I'll stop watching footy.
p.s fair amount of the blame? the AFL has accepted full responsibility for this fopar.
DarwinRoo
17 May 2008, 17:28
$400,000 in the bank regardless of how many turned up. The AFL are the ones looking like fools.
bzparkes
17 May 2008, 17:43
Undoubtedly the fact that they are playing the Eagles is a massive blow and is more than just a minor contribution to the low figures. Playing against a side with one win from seven games is hardly an inspiration for spectators. Especially with a forward line as functional as the reactors as Chernobyl - a fact born out by a horribly woeful percentage of only 66. In fact they are only seperated from the horrifically performed Demons and bottom spot by 6%.
Actually our forward line has been pretty much the only shining light for us this year. Our midfield is the thing that's letting us down, it's been shithouse.
KingsCrow
17 May 2008, 17:49
$400,000 in the bank regardless of how many turned up. The AFL are the ones looking like fools.
Kangaroo Corp.
Bigeasy
17 May 2008, 17:59
I know you North supporters struggle with your reading, but the OP actually absolves you of a fair amount of the blame for a poor attendance tonight. As I said, not many people want to turn up to see the awesome machine that is West Coast at the moment.
Yep thanks for typing what I was about to say.
Great crowd at Aurora today.
Perhaps North should play the Hawks at Carrara, the Hawks would draw a crowd up here :thumbsu:
keefriffhard
17 May 2008, 18:22
"You've got to have some pity for North."???
When we want your pity, I'll stop watching footy.
p.s fair amount of the blame? the AFL has accepted full responsibility for this fopar.
You french is only just a touch worse than your english. The phrase is "faux pas". :thumbsu:
jacko57
17 May 2008, 18:25
You french is only just a touch worse than your english. The phrase is "faux pas". :thumbsu:
Perhaps he just assumed you needed it to be spelled foneticly.
;)
DockersMad
17 May 2008, 18:32
You french is only just a touch worse than your english. The phrase is "faux pas". :thumbsu:
Faux pas might be the correct spelling, but I think the correct term to use would be more like fubar.
Spartan
17 May 2008, 22:13
Surely you'd be one of those who'd imply that in 2004 we were tanking for picks. And we still had a higher percentage than your mob in '08 when they're giving it their best shot.
Thank God for Melbourne eh.
Doesn't matter if you tanked or not, you sucked balls.
I'll guareentee we'll finish with a higher percentage this year than you guys did in 2004.
As far as our current state goes, yes we suck right now but atleast its only been 2 years since our last flag.
When was the last time you guys won a flag again? :o
keefriffhard
17 May 2008, 22:15
Doesn't matter if you tanked or not, you sucked balls.
I'll guareentee we'll finish with a higher percentage this year than you guys did in 2004.
As far as our current state goes, yes we suck right now but atleast its only been 2 years since our last flag.
When was the last time you guys won a flag again? :o
Not saying we did tank, just happens when you gut your list to rebuild.
Good to see your giving a good yelp on the GC. :thumbsu:
Spartan
17 May 2008, 22:22
Not saying we did tank, just happens when you gut your list to rebuild.
Good to see your giving a good yelp on the GC. :thumbsu:
Win or lose when I see how our youngsters like Masten, McKinley, Kennedy and Schofield are going I think we'll be back up there before too long.
We won't tank. We will list manage.. just like Carlton did last year and you guys did in 2004. ;)
keefriffhard
17 May 2008, 22:24
Win or lose when I see how our youngsters like Masten, McKinley, Kennedy and Schofield are going I think we'll be back up there before too long.
We won't tank. We will list manage.. just like Carlton did last year and you guys did in 2004. ;)
Kennedy is a great pick up. I can't believe the body shape difference from one pre-seson in the West.
List management is the secret. ;)
Hawkamania!
18 May 2008, 01:03
Doesn't matter if you tanked or not, you sucked balls.
I'll guareentee we'll finish with a higher percentage this year than you guys did in 2004.
As far as our current state goes, yes we suck right now but atleast its only been 2 years since our last flag.
When was the last time you guys won a flag again? :o
1991 against a WA state side. How embarrassing for WA's Indian Pacific Limited to be beaten by a Victorian suburban club from Hawthorn. :)
GF Head to Head: Hawthorn 1 - IPL 0.
jacko57
18 May 2008, 02:05
Yeah they should have played it in Melbourne instead and had 5,000 people turn up :thumbsu: :D
Great game tonight, wasn't it? Great result! Hope you enjoyed it, borntoberiled. :)
SweetLeftFoot
18 May 2008, 02:25
Yeah they should have played it in Melbourne instead and had 5,000 people turn up :thumbsu: :D
Last North v Eagles game in Melbourne drew 33,000.
SweetLeftFoot
18 May 2008, 02:26
1991 against a WA state side. How embarrassing for WA's Indian Pacific Limited to be beaten by a Victorian suburban club from Hawthorn. :)
GF Head to Head: Hawthorn 1 - IPL 0.
A Victorian suburban side whose best players were a Queensland full forward, a WA centreman, an SA rover (with stupid hair) and an SA mid cum forward called Jarman ...
I'm all for slagging the franchise clubs but pretending your team was selected entirely of lads who lived within a stones throw of Glenferrie station is plain laughable.
jacko57
18 May 2008, 02:28
Last North v Eagles game in Melbourne drew 33,000.
Well, that statistic makes borntobelaughedat look like a complete fool.....but that's nothing new.
dipper86
18 May 2008, 02:32
Last North v Eagles game in Melbourne drew 33,000.
24,000 Eagles supporters made the trip down. :thumbsu:
Last North v Eagles game in Melbourne drew 33,000.
Actually, the last North v Eagles game in Melbourne drew 26,113. But please, don't let the facts get in the way...
SweetLeftFoot
18 May 2008, 03:04
The 2006 game at the Dome drew 33,000. Did we even play them in Melbourne last year?
The 2006 game at the Dome drew 33,000. Did we even play them in Melbourne last year?
Yes, in that game West Coast won by three goals. Proceeding the game most of your BigFooty supporter base whinged for about a week on how the umpires hung your players by the balls.
SweetLeftFoot
18 May 2008, 03:19
Yes, in that game West Coast won by three goals. Proceeding the game most of your BigFooty supporter base whinged for about a week on how the umpires hung your players by the balls.
Aye, I recall now. My bad, I seemed to remember that being in West Coast.
Either way, our last two games in Melb against WCE have drawn 26 and 33k.
Far better result than 6k.
Spartan
18 May 2008, 11:02
1991 against a WA state side. How embarrassing for WA's Indian Pacific Limited to be beaten by a Victorian suburban club from Hawthorn. :)
GF Head to Head: Hawthorn 1 - IPL 0.
So ignoring the bullshit you haven't won a flag since 1991, 6000+ days and counting. Haven't even made a GF in that time have you? Poor things, so starved of success. I can see why you guys are getting so excited. Carry on. :thumbsu: :o
A Victorian suburban side whose best players were a Queensland full forward, a WA centreman, an SA rover (with stupid hair) and an SA mid cum forward called Jarman ...
I'm all for slagging the franchise clubs but pretending your team was selected entirely of lads who lived within a stones throw of Glenferrie station is plain laughable.
Never let the facts in the way of a good story. The original West Coast team was hardly the 'state' team as a poster recently pointed out. :eek:
I'm happy with the 'state' team's 3 premierships since 1991. :cool:
Murph_The_Smurf
18 May 2008, 11:06
Whats the average attendance of Hawks home games compared to the Eagles home games this year?
ive been to a few hawk games , there attendance would be a bit higher then westcoasts , only reason u packed ur ground last week was the fact judd first game against you guys
The Cryptkeeper
18 May 2008, 11:57
You guys should understand that quite well, with your 70 percentage in 2004 when you went within 1% of another wooden spoon. :thumbsu:
Now when was the last time Hawthorn won the wooden spoon?:rolleyes:
I'll give you a couple of hints:
1) it was before Australia introduced decimal currency.
2) Robert Menzies was the Australian Prime Minister.
Spartan
18 May 2008, 11:58
ive been to a few hawk games , there attendance would be a bit higher then westcoasts , only reason u packed ur ground last week was the fact judd first game against you guys
Actually every game this year has been pretty much sold out and I'm pretty confident next week's game will be sold out as well. If we had a bigger stadium we'd be filling that too. Thanks for your two cents though. :thumbsu:
Spartan
18 May 2008, 11:59
Now when was the last time Hawthorn won the wooden spoon?:rolleyes:
I'll give you a hint: it was before Australia introduced decimal currency and Robert Menzies was Prime Minister.
Fair enough.
That was more to highlight that you guys actually have 'won' the spoon before. ;)
jacko57
18 May 2008, 12:00
Now when was the last time Hawthorn won the wooden spoon?:rolleyes:
I'll give you a couple of hints:
1) it was before Australia introduced decimal currency.
2) Robert Menzies was the Australian Prime Minister.
It was when Melbourne was a power club?
Whats the average attendance of Hawks home games compared to the Eagles home games this year?
In Melbourne
Vs. Melbourne - 40120 (SUN N) 2nd biggest Melbourne crowd for the year
Vs. Richmond - 46064 (SUN N) 3rd biggest Richmond crowd for the year
Vs. Collingwood - 76048 (SAT) 3rd biggest total crowd for the year
AVG - 54,077
Away game
Vs. North Melbourne - 39781 (SAT) 2nd biggest North home crowd for the year
AVG - 50,503 (only behind Collingwood and Carlton out of the Vic clubs)
Tasmania
Vs. Adelaide - 15226
Vs. Port Adelaide - 15648
AVG - 15,507
Compared to West Coast
Perth
Vs. Brisbane - 39591
Vs. Port - 38302
Vs. Fremantle - 39027
Vs. Carlton - 41927
AVG - 39,207
Hawthorn's support base = easily the most under rated in the league.
$400,000 in the bank regardless of how many turned up. The AFL are the ones looking like fools.
Gotta say, Rob, it astounds me how many people seem to forget this. Whatever happens, we pocket $400,000. It's the AFL who misses out - they're collecting the gate receipts - which worries me more than anything.
sutcliffe's hotel
18 May 2008, 15:24
Gotta say, Rob, it astounds me how many people seem to forget this. Whatever happens, we pocket $400,000.
Gotta love the wasted trolling in these threads.
The trolls so busy counting the crowds while all we are counting is the filthy lucre.
Braun_2_B_Wild
18 May 2008, 15:55
Gotta say, Rob, it astounds me how many people seem to forget this. Whatever happens, we pocket $400,000. It's the AFL who misses out - they're collecting the gate receipts - which worries me more than anything.
What astounds me is that you think people are actually talking about the monetary side of things?? :confused: It shows you where the Kangawho's supporters thinking is at.... everything is about where your next dollar is coming from.
We look at it and see that you can't attract a crowd anywhere. Nobody likes the Kangaroos and you have blown any chance you had of surviving in this league because even the Gold Coast don't want you anymore.
Frankston Rover
18 May 2008, 16:17
$400,000 in the bank regardless of how many turned up. The AFL are the ones looking like fools.
Gotta say, Rob, it astounds me how many people seem to forget this. Whatever happens, we pocket $400,000. It's the AFL who misses out - they're collecting the gate receipts - which worries me more than anything.
Gotta love the wasted trolling in these threads.
The trolls so busy counting the crowds while all we are counting is the filthy lucre.
Hahaha, so when YOU play interstate, it's a super idea and a great way to make money, yet when we do it (for 200k extra per game, I might add) we are sell-outs?
Double standards?
Or are you finally admitting what a great sponsorship Hawthorn has.
Hahaha, so when YOU play interstate, it's a super idea and a great way to make money, yet when we do it (for 200k extra per game, I might add) we are sell-outs?
Double standards?
Or are you finally admitting what a great sponsorship Hawthorn has.
Have you been on the piss again?
The only posts I've read of people canning Hawthorns agreement is other supporters, or supporters slamming our claim when you're doing the same thing. This thread is about the crowd that attended last night - which nobody gives a shit about. We still get our $400,000. Sorry but I'm struggling to see the point, financially.
Frankston Rover
18 May 2008, 16:35
Have you been on the piss again?
The only posts I've read of people canning Hawthorns agreement is other supporters, or supporters slamming our claim when you're doing the same thing. This thread is about the crowd that attended last night - which nobody gives a shit about. We still get our $400,000. Sorry but I'm struggling to see the point, financially.
WTF? :confused:
So the 1,324,782 "Tassie" references from Groundskeeper Willie, Teflon Dean and the rest you vagrants is all in my imagination?
The reason we play in Tasmania is because of MONEY. Always has been, always will be. We do not play there because we want to move there, be relocated there or just for the hell of it. It is purely a financial decision.
Your supporters have crapped on about the financial windfall you recieve from the GC game like it is some sort of marketing genius, yet it's those same supporters who give us shit about our 'Tasmania' sponsorship.
Like I said, this is either double standards or it is about time you guys admitted our sponsorship with the Tasmanian Government is a fantastic deal.
Which is it?
WTF? :confused:
So the 1,324,782 "Tassie" references from Groundskeeper Willie, Teflon Dean and the rest you vagrants is all in my imagination?
The reason we play in Tasmania is because of MONEY. Always has been, always will be. We do not play there because we want to move there, be relocated there or just for the hell of it. It is purely a financial decision.
Your supporters have crapped on about the financial windfall you recieve from the GC game like it is some sort of marketing genius, yet it's those same supporters who give us shit about our 'Tasmania' sponsorship.
Like I said, this is either double standards or it is about time you guys admitted our sponsorship with the Tasmanian Government is a fantastic deal.
Which is it?
Give me a run down of the North Melbourne posters that have started a thread shitcanning Hawthorns reasoning behind the Tasmania home games, that haven't been instigated by similar?
jacko57
18 May 2008, 16:48
What astounds me is that you think people are actually talking about the monetary side of things?? :confused: It shows you where the Kangawho's supporters thinking is at.... everything is about where your next dollar is coming from.
We look at it and see that you can't attract a crowd anywhere. Nobody likes the Kangaroos and you have blown any chance you had of surviving in this league because even the Gold Coast don't want you anymore.
No, you look at a situation where the AFL's inept and dishonest bungling has guaranteed there will be a small crowd, and imagine it spells the end of the North Melbourne Football Club. Not for the first time in your achievement-free life, you are wrong.
Still, it was a good game, wasn't it? :)
Frankston Rover
18 May 2008, 16:51
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showthread.php?t=434163&highlight=Tassie
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showthread.php?t=431432&highlight=Tassie
Here are two to get you started, Mark....
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showthread.php?t=434163&highlight=Tassie
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showthread.php?t=431432&highlight=Tassie
Here are two to get you started, Mark....Well thankyou, you obviously can't (or can't read).
In future, if you want to pick at a clubs supporters, have a gander at who did the picking first. Then get all righteous on me. Otherwise it doesn't cut it. :cool:
Frankston Rover
18 May 2008, 17:41
You can try and palm it off all you like but the fact remains your supporters crap on about how much money they made off the GC game, yet those same supporters hang it on Hawthorn for doing the same thing.
Care to explain that?
budge11
18 May 2008, 17:44
Didn't we get 400k and 4 points last night, and you feel sorry for us?
Frankston Rover
18 May 2008, 17:48
I don't feel sorry for you. And we got 4 points and 600k yesterday.
But, apparently, that's different....
budge11
18 May 2008, 17:50
I'm just stating the facts.
Would you guys get 400k with 6k in the crowd? I think not.
Frankston Rover
18 May 2008, 17:55
We'd get 600k with no people, dipshit. We have the same deal you do, only BETTER.
Hawkamania!
18 May 2008, 18:46
So ignoring the bullshit you haven't won a flag since 1991, 6000+ days and counting. Haven't even made a GF in that time have you? Poor things, so starved of success. I can see why you guys are getting so excited. Carry on. :thumbsu: :o
Streaks are wonderful things to be happy about. Our streak of 8 wins in a row would make any fan happy. Meanwhile, your streak of 7 losses is ample amusement for all non-IPL fans.:)
Never let the facts in the way of a good story. The original West Coast team was hardly the 'state' team as a poster recently pointed out. :eek:
I'm happy with the 'state' team's 3 premierships since 1991. :cool:
Two state teams - 1992 and 1994. Check out the history of AFL drafts and concessions given to the Indian Pacific Limited during the first four years. That also goes for the serial kanga nuff-nuff as well.
jacko57
18 May 2008, 19:35
You can try and palm it off all you like but the fact remains your supporters crap on about how much money they made off the GC game, yet those same supporters hang it on Hawthorn for doing the same thing.
Care to explain that?
Yours is a valid point.
Perhaps you can make it to some of your obsessed mates who like to crap on about North drawing a low crowd at Carrara...........or even, believe it or not, still try to troll us with taunts about how North are set to relocate to the Gold Coast.:rolleyes:
marcusesq
18 May 2008, 20:50
Yours is a valid point.
Perhaps you can make it to some of your obsessed mates who like to crap on about North drawing a low crowd at Carrara...........or even, believe it or not, still try to troll us with taunts about how North are set to relocate to the Gold Coast.:rolleyes:
Yours too is a valid point. But with the likes of Teflon Dildo and Swollen Left Hand still trying their best, dont expect anything to change.
Spartan
18 May 2008, 20:55
In Melbourne
Vs. Melbourne - 40120 (SUN N) 2nd biggest Melbourne crowd for the year
Vs. Richmond - 46064 (SUN N) 3rd biggest Richmond crowd for the year
Vs. Collingwood - 76048 (SAT) 3rd biggest total crowd for the year
AVG - 54,077
Away game
Vs. North Melbourne - 39781 (SAT) 2nd biggest North home crowd for the year
AVG - 50,503 (only behind Collingwood and Carlton out of the Vic clubs)
Tasmania
Vs. Adelaide - 15226
Vs. Port Adelaide - 15648
AVG - 15,507
Compared to West Coast
Perth
Vs. Brisbane - 39591
Vs. Port - 38302
Vs. Fremantle - 39027
Vs. Carlton - 41927
AVG - 39,207
Hawthorn's support base = easily the most under rated in the league.
Never underrated Hawthorn's crowds although those figures do suprise me a little.
Our figures would be higher if we had more seats at subiaco. ;)
Spartan
18 May 2008, 20:56
Streaks are wonderful things to be happy about. Our streak of 8 wins in a row would make any fan happy. Meanwhile, your streak of 7 losses is ample amusement for all non-IPL fans.:)
Two state teams - 1992 and 1994. Check out the history of AFL drafts and concessions given to the Indian Pacific Limited during the first four years. That also goes for the serial kanga nuff-nuff as well.
Blah blah blah?
I'll ask the same old question again, when was the last time you won a premiership?
Also for such a 'proud' team.. didn't you guys vote in favour of a merger to Melbourne? :eek:
Roo-Boy
18 May 2008, 21:38
What astounds me is that you think people are actually talking about the monetary side of things?? :confused: It shows you where the Kangawho's supporters thinking is at.... everything is about where your next dollar is coming from.
We look at it and see that you can't attract a crowd anywhere. Nobody likes the Kangaroos and you have blown any chance you had of surviving in this league because even the Gold Coast don't want you anymore.
It was nice to get the 4pts from your Franchise team and ever better that your mate Captain Afterworld's team Essendon also lost and you's both should get together to drown your sorrows
Hawkamania!
18 May 2008, 21:45
Blah blah blah?
I'll ask the same old question again, when was the last time you won a premiership?
I answered the question in an earlier post. You're a bit slow there little fella.
Also for such a 'proud' team.. didn't you guys vote in favour of a merger to Melbourne? :eek:
No. Our club voted against the merger. Nice try with distorting facts. Maybe instead of posting fiction on BigFooty, you should try doing some research into our games history. That may stop you from looking foolish.
I answered the question in an earlier post. You're a bit slow there little fella.
No. Our club voted against the merger. Nice try with distorting facts. Maybe instead of posting fiction on BigFooty, you should try doing some research into our games history. That may stop you from looking foolish.
LOL! Spartan is looking very average with the distortion of FACTS............
MC_Bomba
19 May 2008, 00:38
We'd get 600k with no people, dipshit. We have the same deal you do, only BETTER.
OH will you just shut the ____ up:mad:
In every single one of your posts is just whinge whinge whinge:mad:
You must feel pretty proud arguing with people on an internet forum over Melbourne teams playing home games interstate.:mad:
Maybe its time you looked in the mirror and got a life:mad:
Frankston Rover
19 May 2008, 09:20
OH will you just shut the ____ up:mad:
In every single one of your posts is just whinge whinge whinge:mad:
You must feel pretty proud arguing with people on an internet forum over Melbourne teams playing home games interstate.:mad:
Maybe its time you looked in the mirror and got a life:mad:
I've only seen you post this once and it seems to me you are the one who likes to whinge.
Maybe you could add something to the discussion (this is Bay 13 afterall) or you could just ____ right off to where you were hiding.
I've only seen you post this once and it seems to me you are the one who likes to whinge.
Maybe you could add something to the discussion (this is Bay 13 afterall) or you could just ____ right off to where you were hiding.
Careful F-R, looks like you may have struck a nerve there:confused: You presenting the facts kinda took a toll on some of the younger fellas....:D
Spartan
19 May 2008, 11:01
I answered the question in an earlier post. You're a bit slow there little fella.
No. Our club voted against the merger. Nice try with distorting facts. Maybe instead of posting fiction on BigFooty, you should try doing some research into our games history. That may stop you from looking foolish.
I'd only research if I cared about the issue. ;)
Also thats why my point was a question and not a statement. Also ok the club voted for a merger. That kinda indicates what a shit state your club was in.
As for looking foolish, most Hawthorn supporters crapping on about how great they are when they haven't done SFA in 16 years and counting after being stuck to the bottom of the ladder for most of this decade (yes I realise thats where WCE are right now) are doing a much better job than me. :) :thumbsu:
LOL! Spartan is looking very average with the distortion of FACTS............
Wtf? I'll give you some advice. I suggest you pull that straw out of Hawkamania!'s ass. I think he can take care of himself without your provision of cavalry.
I'd only research if I cared about the issue. ;)
Also thats why my point was a question and not a statement. Also ok the club voted for a merger. That kinda indicates what a shit state your club was in.
As for looking foolish, most Hawthorn supporters crapping on about how great they are when they haven't done SFA in 16 years and counting after being stuck to the bottom of the ladder for most of this decade (yes I realise thats where WCE are right now) are doing a much better job than me. :) :thumbsu:
Wtf? I'll give you some advice. I suggest you pull that straw out of Hawkamania!'s ass. I think he can take care of himself without your provision of cavalry.
Yeah, but try getting the FACTS right next time