Can anybody tell me?

[thatswhatimtalkinabout]

Who sat on the tribunal last night?

I really would like to know to make sure we never appeal to these three particular monkeys ever again.

[vaporjet]

Wayne Schimmelbusch, David Pittman and Wayne Henwood

http://www.realfooty.com.au/news/news/mcglynn-four-burgoyne-three/2008/05/20/1211182802997.html

[noosa hawk mad]

Wayne Schimmelbusch, David Pittman and Wayne Henwood

http://www.realfooty.com.au/news/news/mcglynn-four-burgoyne-three/2008/05/20/1211182802997.html

You would think they would have some knowledge of the game & in the spirit it is played they don't!
soft as 4 weeks!we teach our players to attack the contest what was he supposed to do?:confused:

[cuttlefish]

I hate to say it, but I think McGlynn had it coming. He made a foolishly late tackle (or was it a bump ?) in his first game back this season, and then did it again last weekend. He was lucky the first time, not so lucky the second.

[Neville Bartos]

Wayne Schimmelbusch, David Pittman and Wayne Henwood

http://www.realfooty.com.au/news/news/mcglynn-four-burgoyne-three/2008/05/20/1211182802997.html

If Pittman edudicates as well as he played then it's no surprise that we're f*cked!

[Hodgepodge]

Wayne Schimmelbusch, David Pittman and Wayne Henwood

http://www.realfooty.com.au/news/news/mcglynn-four-burgoyne-three/2008/05/20/1211182802997.html

i'm surprised caroline ____ing wilson wasn't on it, she's on every other panel she's not qualified to sit on


Anyway if Schimmelbush and co should happen to have a fall down the stairs and break their foot bones, that can't be helped.

[Scribe]

He deserved 3, was stupid to appeal and got the 4 as expected.

The monkeys here are the posters who honestly can't see how reckless and stupid McGlynn's challenge was. This isn't hard footy, its stupid reckless footy and the sooner some people (including our players) realise this, the better.

In the current environment when head-high contact on players with their head over the ball is an absolute no-no, he was very stupid in "making a contest" :rolleyes: as you have tried to argue. Absolute bullsh!t people, and the proper yardstick for parity is Burgoyne's on Mitchell (not Hall on Staker). What happened to Burgoyne? Got 3 after he collected Sam Mitchell.

What could McGlynn do I hear you ask?
Answer - go in lower and try to collect the ball instead of Cornes' head. :thumbsd::mad:

[Hodgepodge]

He deserved 3, was stupid to appeal and got the 4 as expected.

The monkeys here are the posters who honestly can't see how reckless and stupid McGlynn's challenge was. This isn't hard footy, its stupid reckless footy and the sooner some people (including our players) realise this, the better.

In the current environment when head-high contact on players with their head over the ball is an absolute no-no, he was very stupid in "making a contest" :rolleyes: as you have tried to argue. Absolute bullsh!t people, and the proper yardstick for parity is Burgoyne's on Mitchell (not Hall on Staker). What happened to Burgoyne? Got 3 after he collected Sam Mitchell.

What could McGlynn do I hear you ask?
Answer - go in lower and try to collect the ball instead of Cornes' head. :thumbsd::mad:

i'd've given him two.

[RustyHawk]

S2C wrote 21.05.08 12:06

You really have to get over the fact that we happened to lose out on the tribunal. Don't make up excuses for what happened. It won't work for you.
Move on from this. I know that you and many others are pissed off at this but look it is actually the rules that got him into trouble and if you try and appeal the suspension the next step isn't actually an appeal. It is actually a review of the case........

[Alabama Hot Pocket]

I don't even know why they challenged it. Looked very dirty. He is an angry little ant.

[BigAl3001]

is it still raining there in England?