PDA

View Full Version : Anderson: The Fixer


SuperDude
21 May 2008, 10:41
http://www.realfooty.com.au/ffximage/2008/05/21/aaAnderson_wideweb__470x311,0.jpgMr Unpopular: Adrian Anderson.
Photo: Justin Mcmanus

Anderson: The Fixer

Caroline Wilson | May 21, 2008

YOU'RE not in this job to be popular," the new AFL chief executive, Andrew Demetriou, told his new football boss Adrian Anderson in February 2004.
Eight months later, at the end of Anderson's first season in the job, Demetriou told him: "You've exceeded even my expectations."
Anderson laughs when he tells the story now in this, his first extensive interview with The Age after more than four years and four full and turbulent seasons in the job. Several times over the journey, however, the AFL's most demanding and integral position has been for him no laughing matter.
He was taken to task in the most vitriolic of terms by some senior commentators and accused of indecision, even internally, and then for being too decisive in his rule changes.
He was singled out and pilloried by this newspaper following the Fremantle-St Kilda "sirengate" two seasons ago, attacked by some frustrated coaches for his poor communication skills and even indirectly referred to as "stupid" by Collingwood coach Mick Malthouse during the ever-evolving interchange controversy earlier this season. Anderson, however, says all the pain was worthwhile.
More to the point, had this interview taken place inside the MCG or Telstra Dome and Anderson's style been more aggressive, he might well have pointed upwards and shouted: "Scoreboard!"
"By the end of 2005, the game was more stop-start than ever before and flooding had become prevalent," he said. "Since then, we have introduced six new rules and interpretations, including changing the kick-in rule, stopping the holding up of players after marks and free kicks and a stricter interpretation of holding the ball.
"We've made some changes to the game that have set the framework for some of the greatest games ever seen. I am not taking the credit for that and neither is the AFL. Players and clubs are responsible for the game.
"But we have put in place the framework for it. We have seen a 60% increase in the time the ball is in play. The game is more continuous and more free-flowing and the rule changes have made it harder to flood."
Although he admits his communication skills were not as strong as they could have been to clubs early in the job, and the recent controversy over experimental changes to interchange procedures for the NAB Cup should have been relayed to coaches earlier than late December, he credited his relationship with coaches such as Mark Williams as improving not only football but conditions for players.

"Mark, by eloquently putting forward his case in a very direct fashion, probably led to us correctly protecting players with their heads over the ball. That rule will prevent some player in the future from suffering serious head or neck injuries," he said.
"In 2005, we had one-quarter of the rucks in the competition sitting on the sidelines with PCL (posterior cruciate ligament) injuries. We changed the ruck rule and people complained, but now those injuries are no longer prevalent."
Several years ago, Anderson was moved to ask colleagues and even some journalists how they dealt with savage criticism that came their way. Even Demetriou took him to task — mildly publicly, less so privately — when he stumbled on radio over a question relating to total player payments.
These days, Anderson is significantly more prepared. "Andrew can be direct, but I think that's a good thing. He backs his staff but he expects results. You'd rather know where you stand."
Nowadays, too, Anderson said he is far better emotionally equipped to deal with public scrutiny. He has caught up with Malthouse privately following the Collingwood coach's most recent tongue-lashing, for which Malthouse later apologised.
"Kevin Sheedy told me when I took on this job: 'Just remember mate, controversy is your friend.' I didn't realise it at the time but that was a sage piece of advice… controversy and debate are part of the game.
"I do acknowledge that in some cases, there's a perception that they (AFL coaches) are not listened to enough." A perception or reality? "Do I think we could communicate better? Yes, I do. And I think we are getting better at it."
Anderson's profile in his early years was not helped by his background. Not only was he young at 31 when he took on the job and a successful lawyer, but unlike his two most immediate predecessors, Andrew Demetriou and Ian Collins, he had not played at league level.
Before Collins came popular, roguish and highly experienced club pioneer Alan Schwab and before Schwab, Jack Hamilton — a ruthless Collingwood full-back and a much-loved larger-than-life character.
Not all of those reached the top AFL job but all aspired to it and were all contenders.
Although the AFL was restructured during Wayne Jackson's reign to downgrade the football operations position — then held by Collins — to level with a number of other executive positions, Demetriou reshaped it to a position of influence that, in practical terms, had him virtually running the show alongside Jackson.

Anderson is not seen as an immediate successor to Demetriou, who raised eyebrows at the commission in 2006 when he promoted Gillon McLachlan (broadcasting and commercial operations manager) to the No. 2 post previously held by Football Federation Australia boss Ben Buckley. When Demetriou was in a helicopter in February with National Australia Bank boss Ahmed Fahour and others during a Dubai promotion, the AFL boss commented: "If this goes down, Gillon's in charge."
Demetriou told The Age recently that he deliberately promoted McLachlan over Anderson because of the latter's workload in reshaping the AFL's judicial system, draft and laws of the game in a bid to ease flooding and the growing number of stoppages. And AFL chairman Mike Fitzpatrick, when asked by The Age in February whether he was concerned by "cowboyish" behaviour among his executive, responded in the negative but then took the opportunity, unprompted, to praise the work Anderson had done in reforming the tribunal system, something even Demetriou himself admits he was unable to achieve.
"It was clear to me when I took on the job," Anderson said, "that the structure had already changed. And I had a lot to focus on. We had a judicial system that needed reform that had been running along pretty much the same lines for 100 years and now I think everyone would agree it's far more workable."
Anderson knows there will always be another issue around the corner. This week, it was the interchange fiasco, at the start of the season it was "tanking" and somewhere in between, his decision to spend four weeks overseas with the AFL's blessing to further his studies.
Regarding the priority pick system, which he has also changed, Anderson admits: "I'm not pretending that tanking or talk of tanking doesn't exist. I'm not avoiding the issue and I'm not denying it's an issue. It's a difficult balancing act and one of the fundamentals of our competition is that teams are trying when they go out on the park. But there is a genuine upside and the draft and the salary cap are two key planks to our competition and the draft creates a system where bottom teams get access to the best players."
Anderson said his two key mentors were his father Ken and his wife Fi — he has become both married and a father since joining the AFL.
His father's advice in the worst of times, he says, was simple: "Keep your eye on the ball and get on with it."



Still Think he Should be Sacked Long with his mates in the AFL

Link Here
(http://www.realfooty.com.au/news/news/anderson-the-fixer/2008/05/20/1211182803009.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap2)

T-Pain
21 May 2008, 10:43
the only reason he's so unpopular is beacause he's grossly incompetant and an incredibly weak person when in the public light.

catters05
21 May 2008, 11:08
The ____er more like it, i cant stand what he is doing to the game. Probably a good bloke, but has done too much damage.

This interchange thing is just another piece of crap that shouldn't be getting done, but hey thats what happens when a great game is being looked after by a Lawyer......

Soon the fans will walk if they keep going with what they are doing!

Pamam
21 May 2008, 11:18
surely his close friends would be giving him a lot of crap for turning this game we love into the Sh#t hole it is today!!

TheBloods
21 May 2008, 11:22
YOU'RE not in this job to be popular," the new AFL chief executive, Andrew Demetriou, told his new football boss Adrian Anderson in February 2004.
Eight months later, at the end of Anderson's first season in the job, Demetriou told him: "You've exceeded even my expectations."
And every year he continues to beat that benchmark!

His incompetence is astounding!

Sanks
21 May 2008, 11:31
"We've made some changes to the game that have set the framework for some of the greatest games ever seen. I am not taking the credit for that and neither is the AFL."

Then why are you appearing in an article titled "The Fixer" you little toad.

Looks like Vlad has responded to the calls for Andersons' head from the football world with some well bought positive publicity.

beez
21 May 2008, 11:37
surely his close friends would be giving him a lot of crap for turning this game we love into the Sh#t hole it is today!!

That's if he's got any friends left

TheBloods
21 May 2008, 11:40
"We've made some changes to the game that have set the framework for some of the greatest games ever seen. I am not taking the credit for that and neither is the AFL."

Then why are you appearing in an article titled "The Fixer" you little toad.


And "We've made some changes". What a tool!

On the bench
21 May 2008, 11:51
So he is not in the job to be popular,he has certainly fit that job description to a tee!

voodooguru
21 May 2008, 11:57
Vlad Demetri-doh! and his lovable sidekick D'drian Dunderson. They are surly and incompetent.

Sedat!
21 May 2008, 12:00
Probably a good bloke.
Doubt it....he's a lawyer.

The football public doesn't dislike him for any reason other than his incompetence. This 'objective article' is AFL spin of the worst kind. Caro cops plenty of unwarranted criticism in the public domain, but when puff pieces like this contaminate the sports section of her paper, some of that criticism is hard not to justify.

SuperDude
21 May 2008, 12:04
Doubt it....he's a lawyer.

The football public doesn't dislike him for any reason other than his incompetence. This 'objective article' is AFL spin of the worst kind. Caro cops plenty of unwarranted criticism in the public domain, but when puff pieces like this contaminate the sports section of her paper, some of that criticism is hard not to justify.
Caro is Getting Payed or she loves AA;)

Sanks
21 May 2008, 12:09
Doubt it....he's a lawyer.

The football public doesn't dislike him for any reason other than his incompetence. This 'objective article' is AFL spin of the worst kind. Caro cops plenty of unwarranted criticism in the public domain, but when puff pieces like this contaminate the sports section of her paper, some of that criticism is hard not to justify.

Agreed.........I try very hard to remain objective and even handed about Caro and her football knowledge. Then I see something like this blatant propaganda!

SuperDude
21 May 2008, 12:12
Agreed.........I try very hard to remain objective and even handed about Caro and her football knowledge. Then I see something like this blatant propaganda!

Yeah Just Could talk utter Shit on Footy Classified -I nearly was sick hearing her crap:thumbsd:

morgoth
21 May 2008, 12:24
Anderson is an abject failure. He has lurched from one stuff up to the next and his interchange alterations stand to be the worst yet. Imagine how deflating it will be to have free kicks and goals awarded over some beuracratic stuff up on the bench!!!

As for Caro, she know nothing about football the game, all she does is wrtie about back-room politics and other supferficial crap. That is why no one respects her.

morgoth
21 May 2008, 12:58
The scary thing about this is it is the start of the push to have Anderson suceed Demitriou as CEO.

Puff pieces like this are designed to try and paint someone in a fairer light and are usually done via a PR company.

Sanks
21 May 2008, 13:13
Why is this tool protected? I don't understand why he has not been shown the door.

morgoth
21 May 2008, 13:15
Get on the HUN site where one of the bloggers has called for him to be sacked and get the numbers up.

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/afl/fanforce/index.php/heraldsun/comments/its_time_for_adrian_anderson_to_be_sacked/

pazza
21 May 2008, 13:19
Before everyone jumps the gun...have been reading that he alnog with Andy D are considering a proposal put by North Melbourne to change the F/S rule again, whereby the games for qualification could be wound back to 50 games from 100 games as it is now.

Feerits Elf
21 May 2008, 13:23
Eight months later, at the end of Anderson's first season in the job, Demetriou told him: "You've exceeded even my expectations."

Anderson laughs when he tells the story What a misguidedly arrogant ____.

I'd offer to punch him in the face if I ever saw him in the street, but from the looks of that head he has copped a few knocks already.

Obeanie1
21 May 2008, 13:24
Why is this tool protected? I don't understand why he has not been shown the door.

Simple, Dumbetriou never NEVER admits to mistakes or failings. Anderson is both so he will remain protected, I'd suggest AA has his nose firmly up Dumbetriou's backside.

I've posted this elsewhere but I can see this interchange rule changes as being a huge embarasement in the very near future.......its a ticking time bomb........

voodooguru
21 May 2008, 13:31
Caro - Official Mouthpiece of AFL Headquarters

Her performance on Footy Classified was unbelievable.

Syd
21 May 2008, 13:58
Still Think he Should be Sacked Long with his mates in the AFL

Yes. :cool:

azyboy
21 May 2008, 14:07
Fact of the matter is that the public are voting with their feet re his performance. We're getting along to the footy these days in record numbers. The "brand" of footy is as good as ever, as is evident by the way Geelong took on the competition last year and by how Hawthorn and the dogs are playing this year.

TV rights are the most lucrative in the country and AFL is the number one sport in Oz based on a number of metrics. I'd say he's doing a very good job. I suspect many of the inane rumblings on this thread are from 15 year olds with no understanding that AFL is now a multi multi million dollar business. People in business don't always make decisions to be popular. But if the crowds keep turning up, memberships keep increasing and the corporate dollar is getting on board, I'd say job well done.

TheBloods
21 May 2008, 14:11
I suspect that the high attendances, good football and large TV rights are coincidental with, not the result of, Anderson's work. No different to CEOs of large banks claiming it was their brilliant management that led to huge profit growth in the previous bull market and barnstorming economy.

azyboy
21 May 2008, 14:17
I suspect that the high attendances, good football and large TV rights are coincidental with, not the result of, Anderson's work. No different to CEOs of large banks claiming it was their brilliant management that led to huge profit growth in the previous bull market and barnstorming economy.
Maybe so. But hardly grounds for dismissal, is it?

Sanks
21 May 2008, 14:24
Fact of the matter is that the public are voting with their feet re his performance. We're getting along to the footy these days in record numbers. The "brand" of footy is as good as ever, as is evident by the way Geelong took on the competition last year and by how Hawthorn and the dogs are playing this year.

TV rights are the most lucrative in the country and AFL is the number one sport in Oz based on a number of metrics. I'd say he's doing a very good job. I suspect many of the inane rumblings on this thread are from 15 year olds with no understanding that AFL is now a multi multi million dollar business. People in business don't always make decisions to be popular. But if the crowds keep turning up, memberships keep increasing and the corporate dollar is getting on board, I'd say job well done.

I don't particularly care if the average attendance to games has risen 'X'%. I don't speak about football in terms of the 'brand'. I'm not worried about measuring AFL on against other codes using "a number of metrics".

I am suspicious of anyone that claims to be a fan of the game, has observed the new interchange rule in operation, and defends its creator. I am afraid for the game and what else might be made unrecognisable when the man charged with solving most of its problems spurts out the same corporate lingo drivel to defend his incompotence that you have.

TheBloods
21 May 2008, 14:25
Maybe so. But hardly grounds for dismissal, is it?
No, but his insane initiatives are.

azyboy
21 May 2008, 14:40
I don't particularly care if the average attendance to games has risen 'X'%. I don't speak about football in terms of the 'brand'. I'm not worried about measuring AFL on against other codes using "a number of metrics".

I am suspicious of anyone that claims to be a fan of the game, has observed the new interchange rule in operation, and defends its creator. I am afraid for the game and what else might be made unrecognisable when the man charged with solving most of its problems spurts out the same corporate lingo drivel to defend his incompotence that you have.
Firstly, I'm a big fan of the game so you can sleep easily. My favourite footy ground is KP, and suburban footy is close to my heart so I respect the heritage and history of the game and also believe the AFL need to be mindful of that too.

As for the corporate lingo, I wasn't aware I was engaging in that. Merely, I was pointing out that the AFL is a business and like any business there are KPIs (couldn't resist ;-) and he's hitting them.

Regarding the I/C rules, yeah it needs tweaking, but we're yet to see how it impacts upon the field of play. I'd say give it a few more weeks before making a definitive judgement on it. Unfortunately, it is a business and after the swans/roos debacle, something needed to be done. Is this the solution? I can't comment yet as I've yet to see how it will impact upon the game once it is enforced.

TheBloods
21 May 2008, 14:46
"We've made some changes to the game that have set the framework for some of the greatest games ever seen. "

Which are these games?

Sanks
21 May 2008, 14:50
Firstly, I'm a big fan of the game so you can sleep easily. My favourite footy ground is KP, and suburban footy is close to my heart so I respect the heritage and history of the game and also believe the AFL need to be mindful of that too.

As for the corporate lingo, I wasn't aware I was engaging in that. Merely, I was pointing out that the AFL is a business and like any business there are KPIs (couldn't resist ;-) and he's hitting them.

Regarding the I/C rules, yeah it needs tweaking, but we're yet to see how it impacts upon the field of play. I'd say give it a few more weeks before making a definitive judgement on it. Unfortunately, it is a business and after the swans/roos debacle, something needed to be done. Is this the solution? I can't comment yet as I've yet to see how it will impact upon the game once it is enforced.

It is my view that the AFL and australian rules more broadly is "hitting its KPIs" despite its administration and not due to it.

azyboy
21 May 2008, 14:56
It is my view that the AFL and australian rules more broadly is "hitting its KPIs" despite its administration and not due to it.
NMW Bloods also shares this view and as I said to him/her, it may well be the case.

LIONS then DAYLIGHT
21 May 2008, 16:50
Tubby Taylor and Liam Gallgher would do a better job then these clowns

m0nty
21 May 2008, 17:07
In related news, Pippa Grange has announced that all AFL employees are banned from reading the Age newspaper due to the high risk of mental illness.

"We are concerned with the psychological effects of today's media," said Ms Grange. "In particular, we have started to notice the development of delusions of grandeur and god complexes."

In addition, AFL executives will be banned from appearing on On The Couch.

"Gerard Healy is a dangerous man," said Ms Grange, holding reams of studies on the deleterious effect of omnipotent power fantasies. "AFL employees deserve to have shiny shoes, but saliva is not as good as boot polish."

jacko57
21 May 2008, 18:24
the only reason he's so unpopular is beacause he's grossly incompetant and an incredibly weak person when in the public light.
Anyone else lose their breakfast when they read this garbage?

Sedat!
21 May 2008, 18:24
"We've made some changes to the game that have set the framework for some of the greatest games ever seen. "

Which are these games?
The boys at City Hall are never shy when it comes to self-congratulation.

Black Thunder
21 May 2008, 19:00
Anyone else lose their breakfast when they read this garbage?
what?? T-Pains post or the article.

T-Pains post was fairly spot on.

the article just makes you hate this guys more.

Nothing more than redicolous PR spin.

Another one for the AFL file.

We had Patrick Smith's article earlier in the week about how hard it is being the CEO of a sporting organisation and how little credit you get... :rolleyes:

On the bench
22 May 2008, 10:42
Fact of the matter is that the public are voting with their feet re his performance. We're getting along to the footy these days in record numbers. The "brand" of footy is as good as ever, as is evident by the way Geelong took on the competition last year and by how Hawthorn and the dogs are playing this year.

TV rights are the most lucrative in the country and AFL is the number one sport in Oz based on a number of metrics. I'd say he's doing a very good job. I suspect many of the inane rumblings on this thread are from 15 year olds with no understanding that AFL is now a multi multi million dollar business. People in business don't always make decisions to be popular. But if the crowds keep turning up, memberships keep increasing and the corporate dollar is getting on board, I'd say job well done.

The people are going to the footy because they love their clubs,don't be deluded most fans if not all hate the powerbrokers at the AFL!