PDA

View Full Version : Why do all the clubs want Peel Thunder out of the league?


Thunder Boy
15th December 2000, 22:21
All the other participating clubs in the Westar competition want to see Peel Thunder eliminated for the simple reason that they are scared.

We (as in the P.T.F.C.) are the only club to run an operating profit, have the best junior development program in the state and are building up quite healthy senior sides.

All the other clubs are worried about the power that the club will exhibit power on the competition that the others will not be able to compete with for many years.

I am a 16 year old who is part of the club and am trainig with the senior boys at the moment and it will be quite sad if my club was to be destroyed. A lot of talented young players will no longer play at Westar level for the simple reason that the travel is too far and they now have a resistance built towards other clubs.

I am just 1 of the many people that does not wish too see Peel eliminated from the competetion and at 16 can already see the reasons behind the aim of removing us from the competition. Why not Perth? The finished below us on the league ladder winning just 1 game. Part of the argument is that we do not have a successful league side. What about Perth?

We will see what happens and as most people that have a vision for the future can see, Peel Thunder need to remain in the competition. As I read somewhere" why remove Peel who cater for much of the South-West of the State while clubs in Fremantle have a lot less area to cover.

The arguments in favour stack well in favour of my football club as far as I can see. We will survive and then you may start to realise what a mistake it was to try and remove us from the competition.

Fight hard and we will suceed boys!

Michael Cross

mud n blood
16th December 2000, 03:01
Perhaps its more a case of getting rid of the bye, and the other clubs see this as a last-on-first-off solution. Just a thought.

servo
16th December 2000, 16:35
Who's Peel Thunder??

grant32000
17th December 2000, 07:34
That would be a short sighted decision - they've only been in 4 or 5 years haven't they ? Give em a bit of time. Is there an up coming vote ?

GoEagles
19th December 2000, 05:00
Thunder - people are complaining about Peels senior side's results of the season, but there is great potential for the Thunder. They made some improvements this season and the results from the reserves and colts side show there is a bright future for the club.

Recruiting Derek Hall will be a huge bonus for you guys in 2001, I hope it all goes well http://www.bigfooty.com/ubb/smile.gif

Bloodstained Angel
19th December 2000, 05:13
Decentralisation away from the traditional power bases of Central Perth and Fremantle just has to be the way to go for WA Footy.

Long live Peel, and lets have a team or two playing out of places like Albany and Karratha too !

cheers

mud n blood
19th December 2000, 06:42
Peel's results !!!!!

Didn't they finish above Perth ?

GoEagles
20th December 2000, 04:05
mud n blood yep thats right. Perth was 9th place on the Westar ladder in 2000 with only 1 win (maybe they should link up with St Kilda?) whilst Peel was 8th but with more wins and an improvement from their previous seasons in the competition.

Mobbenfuhrer
10th January 2001, 01:48
Recently saw on old article (I'm well behind the times, here), stating that the Westar Rules League might be reverting to its original name, the WAFL.

Is that still happening?

GoEagles
10th January 2001, 07:49
Well spotted Mobbenfuhrer! The WAFC (West Australian Football Commission) has decided that tradition wins at the end of the day and will revert back to the 'WAFL' for 2001.

Mobbenfuhrer
10th January 2001, 14:46
Thanks, GoEagles.

Personally, I prefer the WAFL name to Westar.

dons_r_tops
16th January 2001, 23:03
peel are an up and coming side but lets hope for their sake it doesn't take as long as the dockers who still haven't made it