PDA

View Full Version : Most important players & Form assessment


Ant V
2 Jun 2008, 21:34
IMPORTANCE
* = injured

Mitchell (Form 8/10)
Bateman (9.5)
Hodge *
Franklin (8.5)
Lewis (7.5)
Croad (7)
Sewell (6.5)
Roughead (8.5)
Campbell (7.5)
Birchall (6.5)
Brown (6)
Taylor (7)
Young (4.5)
Osborne (7.5)
Ladson (7)
Crawford *
Rioli (6)
Gilham (7)
Guerra *
McGlynn*
Boyle*
Ellis (6.5)
Dew *
Tuck*
Williams (4.5)
Kennedy (5)
Clarke (5)
Murphy (4.5)
Morton (5.5)
Stokes *

BoldBuddy
2 Jun 2008, 21:43
Is this a serious post?:confused::confused:
You are an idiot mate, how can you give Williams such a low ranking????
You obviously dont know what u're talking about. :thumbsd:

MC_9
2 Jun 2008, 23:12
IMPORTANCE
* = injured

Mitchell (Form 8/10)
Bateman (9.5)
Hodge *
Franklin (8.5)
Lewis (7.5)
Croad (7)
Sewell (6.5)
Roughead (8.5)
Campbell (7.5)
Birchall (6.5)
Brown (6)
Taylor (7)
Young (4.5)
Osborne (7.5)
Ladson (7)
Crawford *
Rioli (6)
Gilham (7)
Guerra *
McGlynn*
Boyle*
Ellis (6.5)
Dew *
Tuck*
Williams (4.5)
Kennedy (5)
Clarke (5)
Murphy (4.5)
Morton (5.5)
Stokes *

I dont get it, :confused:.

Is it current form or importance.

If either how is Sewell only 6.5, Mitchell 8, and Buddy 8.5.

Edit: I think i get it, so they are in order of importance, and their form is next to them. If that the case i cant say i agree with some of those rankings.

The Cryptkeeper
2 Jun 2008, 23:15
Franklin, as the best player in the AFL is a 10.

Close thread.

browneyyy30
2 Jun 2008, 23:23
definately have 2 put hodge n buddy as 1 and 2 in importance

FisherHawk
3 Jun 2008, 02:45
Out of the 22 ranked, I'm not sure how you could have Young equal last, at 4.5.

For the Hawks, he's ranked 1st for marks and long kicks. And 2nd for kicks and inside 50's. I would think 7/10 for Young so far. He had a couple of ordinary games against Melbourne and Port, but otherwise been ok.

wolvesjr34
3 Jun 2008, 13:40
Out of the 22 ranked, I'm not sure how you could have Young equal last, at 4.5.

For the Hawks, he's ranked 1st for marks and long kicks. And 2nd for kicks and inside 50's. I would think 7/10 for Young so far. He had a couple of ordinary games against Melbourne and Port, but otherwise been ok.

He was ordinary against Bulldogs too.

Don't necessarily agree with 4.5 but I won't go higher than 5.5 because recent form has been abysmal.

GoBuddy
3 Jun 2008, 14:08
Is this a serious post?:confused::confused:
You are an idiot mate, how can you give Williams such a low ranking????
You obviously dont know what u're talking about. :thumbsd:

I totally agree with the poster. 4.5 rating is a bit too much for Williams too. I think he deserves a 3. He only had one good game, and that was against Collingwood. His lazy and has no defensive side at all.

GoBuddy
3 Jun 2008, 14:11
IMPORTANCE
* = injured

Mitchell (Form 8/10)
Bateman (9.5)
Hodge *
Franklin (8.5)
Lewis (7.5)
Croad (7)
Sewell (6.5)
Roughead (8.5)
Campbell (7.5)
Birchall (6.5)
Brown (6)
Taylor (7)
Young (4.5)
Osborne (7.5)
Ladson (7)
Crawford *
Rioli (6)
Gilham (7)
Guerra *
McGlynn*
Boyle*
Ellis (6.5)
Dew *
Tuck*
Williams (4.5)
Kennedy (5)
Clarke (5)
Murphy (4.5)
Morton (5.5)
Stokes *

I think 6.5 for Sewell is a bit low. It should be atleast 7.5. LOL Clarke 5 thats a shocker, he would have gotten 0 from me. How can Clarke get 5 more that Young 4.5. Young played well the first couple of games.

Roughie
3 Jun 2008, 14:18
Sewell is way too low, he along with Lewis single handedly lifted our team to win against Port. Sewell is finally getting the recognition deserved.

kbrowne
3 Jun 2008, 15:10
Sewell is way too low, he along with Lewis single handedly lifted our team to win against Port. Sewell is finally getting the recognition deserved.
Don't you mean dual handedly? Agree though

Roughie
3 Jun 2008, 16:23
Don't you mean dual handedly? Agree though

Hahah good call

The Cryptkeeper
3 Jun 2008, 17:00
Out of the 22 ranked, I'm not sure how you could have Young equal last, at 4.5.

For the Hawks, he's ranked 1st for marks and long kicks. And 2nd for kicks and inside 50's. I would think 7/10 for Young so far. He had a couple of ordinary games against Melbourne and Port, but otherwise been ok.


To balance the above, Young is also the Hawk with the worst disposal efficiency.

He's a solid enough player but not as good as many woud have you believe.

QuietB
3 Jun 2008, 21:52
If the Hawks are going to seriously contend for the premiership then every single player needs to contribute as much as they possibly can and every one of them has an importance of 10.

Hodge is the Hawks best player and is massively missed. He is the only player (maybe in the whole league) who can have a massive influence, and actually dominate in any position on the whole park.

Can't wait to see him back.

#6 Mark Williams
3 Jun 2008, 22:07
Is this a serious post?:confused::confused:
You are an idiot mate, how can you give Williams such a low ranking????
You obviously dont know what u're talking about. :thumbsd:Ditto (" ")

#6 Mark Williams
3 Jun 2008, 22:08
Your a rather hard critique aren't you 'Thread Creator', MR SPEAKER!