View Full Version : Great to hear about the Essendon loss
I was very glad to hear about the bombers going down to frankston yesterday in the VFL. 117 to 93 were the final scores. If they don't get beaten in the seniors then it is great to hear about them getting done in the reserves. If Essendons depth was any good then they would have given Frankston such a thrashing that Frankston would have taken 5 years to recover. Well done Frankston.
-----------------------
Play on says the umpire
-----------------------
eastaugh36
9 Apr 2001, 07:54
if that delights you in the reserves then you badly need a life !
Originally posted by eastaugh36:
if that delights you in the reserves then you badly need a life !
You hypocrit. You were the one that was jumping thru hoops over Glenelg winning the ressies yesterday...saying how great depth you now have.
eastaugh36
9 Apr 2001, 10:40
Originally posted by Macca19:
You hypocrit. You were the one that was jumping thru hoops over Glenelg winning the ressies yesterday...saying how great depth you now have.
yeah , MY reserves team, this fruit loop was getting delight from another teams reserves going down
Blues_Brat
9 Apr 2001, 15:45
Actually, eastaugh you brain dead moron. Play On is talking about the VFL. Just because it is a reserves league for the Melb based AFL clubs LIKE THE SANFL IS for our local AFL teams (you yourself waffled on about ANgwin being a future Crows star), doesn't mean his comments are not valid.
This section of the Big Footy boards is for Regional leagues. ALL Regional Leagues. It's not just for your rants and raves on the delights of being a Glenelg supporting buffoon.
Originally posted by eastaugh36:
yeah , MY reserves team, this fruit loop was getting delight from another teams reserves going down
Um Ok!
U hypocrite, U were just baggin St Kilda and get delight from them losing.
Mags
eastaugh36
9 Apr 2001, 15:54
Originally posted by Mags:
Um Ok!
U hypocrite, U were just baggin St Kilda and get delight from them losing.
Mags
as if I was getting delight ! I tipped them, I was just mad that they played so bad
Originally posted by eastaugh36:
if that delights you in the reserves then you badly need a life !
I guess it does upset you.
-----------------------
Play on says the umpire
-----------------------
It must have been a great game. This mob who have according to their supporters world class depth, allowed nick Sautner to kick 8 goals. A friend of mine who was at the game told me Sautner had 3 opponents and he beat them all. And McAlister for the bombers was reported for tripping. I hope he is rubbed out for life. Couldn't happen to a better club.
-----------------------
Play on says the umpire
-----------------------
eastaugh36
9 Apr 2001, 17:29
Originally posted by play on:
It must have been a great game. This mob who have according to their supporters world class depth, allowed nick Sautner to kick 8 goals. A friend of mine who was at the game told me Sautner had 3 opponents and he beat them all. And McAlister for the bombers was reported for tripping. I hope he is rubbed out for life. Couldn't happen to a better club.
you are a bitter, sour piece of trash arent you ? You are just jealous , and you dont even have the guts to mention which sorry team you support !
Originally posted by eastaugh36:
you are a bitter, sour piece of trash arent you ? You are just jealous , and you dont even have the guts to mention which sorry team you support !
If Easty says I am jealous then I guess he is right. Jealous of a side that allowed 8 goals from Sautner. Jealous of a side who had a player reported for tripping. Jealous of a side who this week are nothing but weak dogs which the scoreboard proved. Plenty to be jealous of.
And look around. I have already said who I go for in another post. I will not post it again because a essenscum person can't be bothered to look around.
-----------------------
Play on says the umpire
-----------------------
Go South
9 Apr 2001, 19:11
Originally posted by eastaugh36:
as if I was getting delight ! I tipped them, I was just mad that they played so bad
You ****ing hypocrit.
TAKE A LOOK AT THE BOARD, you FOOL.
Everytime South lose, you put up a topic for the sole purpose of trashing me. Now, you've started doing it for Sturt, too!
Pot? Kettle? Need I say more!
Just go away - NO ONE here likes you, so just take the hint, and piss off you ignorant ****.
------------------
'...and we won't give up, till the premiership cup is safely in our hands...'
Originally posted by Go South:
Just go away - NO ONE here likes you, so just take the hint, and piss off you ignorant ****.
Here here.
-----------------------
Play on says the umpire
-----------------------
Blues_Brat
10 Apr 2001, 05:43
has eastaugh taken out the dubious honour of being the first person called a 'twat' by one of the bigfooty moderators. (see the "St Kilda suck" thread on the AFL section)
http://www.bigfooty.com/ubb/biggrin.gif
Blues,
I have called Easty more then a twat!
Mags
eastaugh36
10 Apr 2001, 10:09
Originally posted by play on:
If Easty says I am jealous then I guess he is right. Jealous of a side that allowed 8 goals from Sautner. Jealous of a side who had a player reported for tripping. Jealous of a side who this week are nothing but weak dogs which the scoreboard proved. Plenty to be jealous of.
And look around. I have already said who I go for in another post. I will not post it again because a essenscum person can't be bothered to look around.
but its a different story when you talk about the first teams of essendon and the collingduds !
play on
10 Apr 2001, 10:16
Originally posted by eastaugh36:
but its a different story when you talk about the first teams of essendon and the collingduds !
Stop trying to change the subject. This is about the Essenscum seconds. Not the firsts. You are number 1 at trying to change subjects when the heat is on you, are you not?
-----------------------
Play on says the umpire
-----------------------
eastaugh36
10 Apr 2001, 10:37
Originally posted by play on:
Stop trying to change the subject. This is about the Essenscum seconds. Not the firsts. You are number 1 at trying to change subjects when the heat is on you, are you not?
No, I just think it is hilarious how you cant topple essendons firsts so you target our seconds who had a slight loss, ..pathetic !
So Easty,
Whats this I hear about you wanting to be a moderator?
Rumour or Fact Easty?
Mags
play on
10 Apr 2001, 11:08
Let me go on. In the paper for most of the games they have the crowd. In the Sandy Tasmania game they got 1400 people. Springvale v Geelong they got 3321. Coburg v Werribee 2850. Williamstown v Bendigo 1843. The game between North ballarat and Port Melb got 850. Crowds were not given for the other games.
Essendon and frankston on a perfect day got 905 people. Now I can understand Frankston people not comming all the way to Essendon for a seconds game but there should have been at least 2,500 people. I guess Essenscum people don't care about how their young players are going.
-----------------------
Play on says the umpire
-----------------------
eastaugh36
10 Apr 2001, 11:10
Originally posted by play on:
Let me go on. In the paper for most of the games they have the crowd. In the Sandy Tasmania game they got 1400 people. Springvale v Geelong they got 3321. Coburg v Werribee 2850. Williamstown v Bendigo 1843. The game between North ballarat and Port Melb got 850. Crowds were not given for the other games.
Essendon and frankston on a perfect day got 905 people. Now I can understand Frankston people not comming all the way to Essendon for a seconds game but there should have been at least 2,500 people. I guess Essenscum people don't care about how their young players are going.
you are pathetic, at least we have talented players on our list unlike you ! you suck and you dont even have a vfl team !
play on
10 Apr 2001, 11:23
Originally posted by eastaugh36:
you are pathetic, at least we have talented players on our list unlike you ! you suck and you dont even have a vfl team !
And what brings you to this conclusion? I don't have a VFL team. Get the facts right before telling me that I don't have a VFL team.
-----------------------
Play on says the umpire
-----------------------
eastaugh36
10 Apr 2001, 12:13
Originally posted by play on:
And what brings you to this conclusion? I don't have a VFL team. Get the facts right before telling me that I don't have a VFL team.
your woeful club doesnt
play on
10 Apr 2001, 12:50
Originally posted by eastaugh36:
your woeful club doesnt
You should never jump to conclusions. You should realise that they are with Williamstown. And don't jump to the conclusion that I support them. I might I might not. I have already said who I go for so I am not going to repeat it.
-----------------------
Play on says the umpire
-----------------------
eastaugh36
10 Apr 2001, 13:03
Originally posted by play on:
You should never jump to conclusions. You should realise that they are with Williamstown. And don't jump to the conclusion that I support them. I might I might not. I have already said who I go for so I am not going to repeat it.
they are so weak they cant even support a vfl club by themselves !
play on
10 Apr 2001, 13:27
Originally posted by eastaugh36:
they are so weak they cant even support a vfl club by themselves !
Remember to never assume that I go for Williamstown. Remember that there were no AFL teams in the league before last year. I may go for one of the original sides. You know a side who has been in the league for many many years.
-----------------------
Play on says the umpire
-----------------------
eastaugh36
10 Apr 2001, 13:51
Originally posted by play on:
Remember to never assume that I go for Williamstown. Remember that there were no AFL teams in the league before last year. I may go for one of the original sides. You know a side who has been in the league for many many years.
who cares, its only the vfl
play on
10 Apr 2001, 14:12
Originally posted by eastaugh36:
who cares, its only the vfl
You should care as your players from Essenscum are involved in it. As I care about Williamstown in the VFL because they have Collingwood players. But that doesn't mean I barrake for them.
-----------------------
Play on says the umpire
-----------------------
Blues_Brat
10 Apr 2001, 16:15
Originally posted by play on:
Let me go on. In the paper for most of the games they have the crowd. In the Sandy Tasmania game they got 1400 people. Springvale v Geelong they got 3321. Coburg v Werribee 2850. Williamstown v Bendigo 1843. The game between North ballarat and Port Melb got 850. Crowds were not given for the other games.
Essendon and frankston on a perfect day got 905 people. Now I can understand Frankston people not comming all the way to Essendon for a seconds game but there should have been at least 2,500 people. I guess Essenscum people don't care about how their young players are going.
Actually that sounds like a pretty good turn out for the VFL, great to see poeple supporting grass-roots footy. If my memory serves me correctly the then VFA used to attract a decent follwing in the old days. Be intersting to hear the points of view of some supporters who followed it back then of what they think of the current set up.
Although the crowds are pretty decent, on a per capita basis the SANFL still maintains its position as the premeier league aside from the AFL.
Oh and easty, youre a damned fool, must be nice to have a forum to present this to the whole nation rather than just the footy supporters of Adelaide.
Go South
10 Apr 2001, 16:21
Originally posted by Mags:
So Easty,
Whats this I hear about you wanting to be a moderator?
Rumour or Fact Easty?
Mags
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
You have GOT to be joking! He can't even control a conversation, let alone a whole board!!!
------------------
'...and we won't give up, till the premiership cup is safely in our hands...'
play on
10 Apr 2001, 16:31
Originally posted by Blues_Brat:
[BAlthough the crowds are pretty decent, on a per capita basis the SANFL still maintains its position as the premeier league aside from the AFL.
Oh and easty, youre a damned fool.[/B]
The SANFL would be the best league. This was proven after they beat the VFL in the state of origin a few years back. And unless the AFL players can play for the vics, then they will probably go down again.
Easty is a goose. He says that he doesn't care about the league that the Essendon seconds are involved in. I don't believe a word of it and he probably doesn't either.
-----------------------
Play on says the umpire
-----------------------
eastaugh36
10 Apr 2001, 16:49
Originally posted by Go South:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
You have GOT to be joking! He can't even control a conversation, let alone a whole board!!!
haha thats funny !
walshy1993
10 Apr 2001, 18:37
Originally posted by play on:
I was very glad to hear about the bombers going down to frankston yesterday in the VFL. 117 to 93 were the final scores. If they don't get beaten in the seniors then it is great to hear about them getting done in the reserves. If Essendons depth was any good then they would have given Frankston such a thrashing that Frankston would have taken 5 years to recover. Well done Frankston.
you absolute tool
for starters scores were level 10 mins into the last quarter
when frankston booted 5 in arow
frankston had a very experienced side, consisting of beveridge, lynch, just to name a couple
one player, sautner kicked 8 goals, essendon had no match up for him, he was huge, rob forster knight did a good job considering the height difference
essendon had 9 players, playing their first game for essendon
on top of this, robran, mahoney and denham where the only ones with any real afl experience
it was a great effort from a side consisting of several very talented 17 y/o who just dont have the fitness of some of the more experienced players
play on
10 Apr 2001, 18:47
I posted this because Essendon people continue to boast about how good their depth is. If it is as good as people think then they should have won. You say there were 9 players who played their first game for the club. This means that the depth is not so good after all.
-----------------------
Play on says the umpire
-----------------------
Macca19
11 Apr 2001, 08:42
Originally posted by eastaugh36:
No, I just think it is hilarious how you cant topple essendons firsts so you target our seconds who had a slight loss, ..pathetic !
Yet you lose the Port v Glenelg seniors, so you talk about how great it was that the reserves won!!!! Theres that Pot and Kettle again
play on
11 Apr 2001, 08:48
Originally posted by Macca19:
Yet you lose the Port v Glenelg seniors, so you talk about how great it was that the reserves won!!!!
Well said.
-----------------------
Play on says the umpire
-----------------------
eastaugh36
11 Apr 2001, 10:32
Originally posted by Macca19:
Yet you lose the Port v Glenelg seniors, so you talk about how great it was that the reserves won!!!! Theres that Pot and Kettle again
it was worth mentioning due to how good a win it was, even if we had won the league I would have mentioned it
play on
11 Apr 2001, 10:52
Originally posted by Blues_Brat:
[B] Actually that sounds like a pretty good turn out for the VFL, great to see poeple supporting grass-roots footy.
Be intersting to hear the points of view of some supporters who followed it back then of what they think of the current set up.
B]
At a game last year between Collingwood and frankston at Victoria park, they got more than 5,000 people to the game. This I think was the biggest crowd for the Home and away season. It was great to see so many people at the game. Even more so when you consider that the game was on the ABC that day.
As for the set up of the league now, I used to like it the way it was. As it is now we have sides merging and the nicknames of clubs are changing. Box hill, Williamstown, Coburg and Springvale have all merged with AFL clubs. The good thing is that all of the VFL clubs apart from Springvale that have merged still get to play at their home ground instead of the home ground of the AFL club. Springvale who last year played at Waverly will play some of their games at Morrabin as they have merged with ST kilda, and some at Dandenongs old ground. {I think at Dandenongs old ground anyway}
The Preston Bullants are now the northern Bullants, and last year played some of their home games at Victoria park. There was talk about them merging with Collingwood but now the pies are with Williamstown.
There have been too many changes since the AFL clubs have joined the league for me. But I still love it because it is football and footy is the greatest game in the world.
-----------------------
Play on says the umpire
-----------------------
Go South
11 Apr 2001, 17:06
Originally posted by eastaugh36:
haha thats funny !
When I criticise your stupidity - you find it funny.
You've lost the plot completely... someone take him back to his padded cell.
------------------
'...and we won't give up, till the premiership cup is safely in our hands...'
walshy1993
11 Apr 2001, 18:29
Originally posted by play on:
I posted this because Essendon people continue to boast about how good their depth is. If it is as good as people think then they should have won. You say there were 9 players who played their first game for the club. This means that the depth is not so good after all.
5 of these players were 6 of our draft picks
all great players but need to develop
our list isnt as strong as it was last year because we got rid of ready made players in prior, fraser, denham, berbakov, and bewick and replaced them with good kids
essendons depth is great, but we are in a position where not only are we strong, we are also rebuilding for the future
mcgrath, bannister, bullen, switala, forster knight, davis, davies, hunt, d.johnson, ken hall, ted richards, hille etc are all outstanding young players and will all one day play afl football, i doubt there is a team in the comp with that many talented youngsters with the bonus of being able to develop for a couple of years before being thrown into the big time, add to this the strength of the senior side then id say essendons depth is pretty damn good
Macca19
11 Apr 2001, 21:38
Originally posted by eastaugh36:
it was worth mentioning due to how good a win it was, even if we had won the league I would have mentioned it
Well the Frankston game might of been a good win!! stop being hypocritical
eastaugh36
12 Apr 2001, 11:48
Originally posted by walshy1993:
5 of these players were 6 of our draft picks
all great players but need to develop
our list isnt as strong as it was last year because we got rid of ready made players in prior, fraser, denham, berbakov, and bewick and replaced them with good kids
essendons depth is great, but we are in a position where not only are we strong, we are also rebuilding for the future
mcgrath, bannister, bullen, switala, forster knight, davis, davies, hunt, d.johnson, ken hall, ted richards, hille etc are all outstanding young players and will all one day play afl football, i doubt there is a team in the comp with that many talented youngsters with the bonus of being able to develop for a couple of years before being thrown into the big time, add to this the strength of the senior side then id say essendons depth is pretty damn good
your right walshy, we have such a strong first team and then we also have a core of youngsters. even though we may lose some reserves games it will be worth it in the long run when these kids develop and there isnt a better first team to learn from than our team of record breakers. I was glad we got rid of all those fringe types.