Are the Pies Carlton's BUNNIES???

[Juddernaut08]

Discuss.

[Team Mo']

maybe...

But Harry O'Brien is someone's Rabbit!:D

[whippersnipper]

We now have, and will have for the next five years, the Filth on a leash.

Where they belong.

[Dave The Man]

Nope, It's Just that We have no to stop Fev so He Kick 7+ Goals each time and Normally Means they win the Game:(

[OniAu]

presti > fev

shames hes injured lol

[Thrawn]

presti > fev

shames hes injured lol

Yes, because I'm sure a slower Presti would've done a much better job. Fevola beat him last time they played on each other anyways... in fact, I'd like to see his record on him out of interest.

[davis_756]

Fev's kick 25 in the last 4 games with collingwood hasn't he, I'd say collingwood are fevola's bunny.

[parrot]

lol. It certainly seems that way. Collingwood are basically a 9th-10th quality team, who have been talked up as top-4 by their adoring pro-Collingwood media. Yesterday was a nice little reality check for Pies supporters, and a bit a crossroads experience i.e. do they do acknowledge the serious list deficiencies they obviously have, or do they stay in the world of denial, and make up excuses for their back-to-back 2008 humiliations V Blues e.g. blame the umpires, injuries, the draw etc etc. Pies supporters invariably take the denial/excuses path - can't see anything changing. :)

[Carson_Kressley]

i think we are just a much better side then collingwood. we proved that twice this season. we beat the side that stopped geelongs run that says alot for us. we are gonna upset a few more top sides from here on in. we are better then people think we are. someone ask joffa where is his gold jacket hahaha

[hellfire]

I voted yes. As I said before the match, we simply don't match up well with Carlton. But everyone has those bogie teams that they always struggle against. Sydney are our bunnies (though on current form I don't like our chances!)

[parrot]

I voted yes. As I said before the match, we simply don't match up well with Carlton. But everyone has those bogie teams that they always struggle against. Sydney are our bunnies (though on current form I don't like our chances!)

I think the problem is the Pies list is just media-over-rated rubbish. Was very obvious yesterday. I've pointed out the numerous problems on the Pies list to you already, and you saw several nice examples yet again yesterday. Would you like a reminder or are you going to do the usual Collingwood denial-excuses thing? :)

[hellfire]

I think ...

I don't really care what you think, parrot.

http://blogs.smh.com.au/sport/straitjacket_new1.jpg

[bLuEbOy1984]

i think the word is BITCH

[parrot]

I don't really care what you think, parrot....

lol. For the record, what's the current official Collingwood excuse for their 2008 back-to-back thumpings from the Blues? Is it.....

1. The injuries
2. The Draw
3. Playing in front of big crowds makes us tired
4. The Umpires
5. The pre-season was too short
6. The pre-season was too long.
7. All of the above

The reality is of course is...

1. The Pies didn't have the list talent to go with the young Blues.

:)

[hellfire]

lol. For the record, what's the current official Collingwood excuse for their 2008 back-to-back thumpings from the Blues? Is it.....

1. The injuries
2. The Draw
3. Playing in front of big crowds makes us tired
4. The Umpires
5. The pre-season was too short
6. The pre-season was too long.
7. All of the above

The reality is of course is...

1. The Pies didn't have the list talent to go with the young Blues.

:)

No excuses, parrot.

We just don't match up on you. The "list talent" argument doesn't carry weight, given you play your absolute best, with Fev kicking his biggest bags, yet you don't smash us. You definately have our number, the fast-leading forward + dominant midfield combination really troubles us, and it showed yesterday. Just like it did against Hawthorn. I won't try to convince you about list talent, because I know that you refuse to admit any talent on our list. But hey, that's your problem.

[Kenny Hunter]

Yes
even last year when we were tanking at the end of season , we had to find a way to lose the game

Carlton have to much speed in the midfield for the Pies and what worries Carlton the most over the last couple of Years against other sides is Big dangerous fowards like Jon Brown , Pav, Riewoldt, Gehrig. Where with Collingwood we cover Travis Cloke and Rocca easily

[Jeremias]

We just don't match up on you. The "list talent" argument doesn't carry weight, given you play your absolute best, with Fev kicking his biggest bags, yet you don't smash us.

We played at our absolute best, did we? That's hilarious! :D

Face it mate, the game should have been over at quarter time. Our disposal was terrible early, as was our converting in front of goal. That's what kept you in the game for a while.

If we were at our best, we would have been 5+ goals in front and then who knows how much we would have beaten you by.

[Krueger]

I think the problem is the Pies list is just media-over-rated rubbish. Was very obvious yesterday. I've pointed out the numerous problems on the Pies list to you already, and you saw several nice examples yet again yesterday. Would you like a reminder or are you going to do the usual Collingwood denial-excuses thing? :)

I see the drivel that comes from your mouth is not limited to the Cartlon board.

Ok I have a remedy to Collingwoods woes! If we cant win fair and square lets start CHEATING! Yes that it! Oh wait a second ... we are the Collingwood Football club not the Catlon football club. Tough luck eh?

[parrot]

...Ok I have a remedy to Collingwoods woes!....

I really don't think Collingwood or their supporters are serious about success. There was even one Collingwood supporter on BF who opening admited that they view success as making the 8, which was a little pathetic. Flags are the only measure of success, and the aim is to develop a team to deliver them. I mean, have a look at your list. Do you really think O'Bree, O'Brien, Maxwell, Swan, Bryan, Lockyer have the capability of playing in a premiership side? Clearly no, so the next question you have to ask yourself is why this is the case. When the Pies fail, they invariably blame some one or some circumstance, and when the blaming ends, they celebrate being within excuse-reach of success e.g. the supporters getting excited because they got close to beating a team who went on to win the flag. Again pathetic. It's not just the supporters, Eddie and Malthouse are just going through the motion, and collecting their hefty paychecks, funded by the membership dollars, and each year telling the Pies supporters that they could have be successful if this or that happened. It's been going on for well over a decade now. It's a self-perpetuating Collingwood failure cycle. :)

[Krueger]

I really don't think Collingwood or their supporters are serious about success. There was even one Collingwood supporter on BF who opening admited that they view success as making the 8, which was a little pathetic. Flags are the only measure of success, and the aim is to develop a team to deliver them. I mean, have a look at your list. Do you really think O'Bree, O'Brien, Maxwell, Swan, Bryan, Lockyer have the capability of playing in a premiership side? Clearly no, so the next question you have to ask yourself is why this is the case. When the Pies fail, they invariably blame some one or some circumstance, and when the blaming ends, they celebrate being within excuse-reach of success e.g. the supporters getting excited because they got close to beating a team who went on to win the flag. Again pathetic. It's not just the supporters, Eddie and Malthouse are just going through the motion, and collecting their hefty paychecks, funded by the membership dollars, and each year telling the Pies supporters that they could have be successful if this or that happened. It's been going on for well over a decade now. It's a self-perpetuating Collingwood failure cycle. :)

All of the above is better than being a CHEAT. Yes a miserable bunch of CHEATS. Take Fev out of that team and you will really see how good Carlton is - so good they will sink quicker than the Titanic.

Your backline is pathetic, forward line bar Fev is non-existant and rucks worse than ours. Midfield on the other hand is quite good. What would one expect from the years of tanking and raking in the no.1 draft picks for years on end? Then theres all the illegal under the table payments from Pratt to mercenaries who would sell their own grandmother for the $.

Pfff getting advice from A CHEAT. No thanks buddy.

[parrot]

.... they will sink quicker than the Titanic.....

A bit like your last 1/4.

http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/2010/picture4bx2.png

:)

[Krueger]

A bit like your last 1/4.

:)
And very similar to Carltons last seven years :thumbsu:

[parrot]

And very similar to...

...this as well.

http://img292.imageshack.us/img292/8085/resultrr9.jpg

:)

[delirious1]

I think its pretty bloody obviously that they are

[Krueger]

I think its pretty bloody obviously that they are

You think??

http://finalsiren.com/Fixture.asp?TeamID=3&SeasonID=2007&Go=Go

By the way parrot you must have some sort of infatuation with the smiley, seems to be on all of your posts. That or your are just a happy person which i dont think is the case since you barrack for Cartlon and in the last seven years there aint been much to smile about.

[one_twelve112]

^^^^^ Speaking of bunnies, looks like Parrot's found a new one.....

[hellfire]

We played at our absolute best, did we? That's hilarious! :D

Face it mate, the game should have been over at quarter time. Our disposal was terrible early, as was our converting in front of goal. That's what kept you in the game for a while.

If we were at our best, we would have been 5+ goals in front and then who knows how much we would have beaten you by.

So what game this year have you played better in?

:rolleyes:

[hellfire]

^^^^^ Speaking of bunnies, looks like Parrot's found a new one.....

Parrot just takes a fragment of a quote in order to manipulate the original posters comments, to make it easier to refute. In every thread you see the bot post in, you see four or five words quoted because actually sitting down and engaging in semi-logical discussion is beyond the capabilities of a base-model spam bot not calibrated to incorporate reason, and lacking the capacity to rebut. It's somewhat bewildering at first glance - to think that someone as limited as parrot can obtain the necessary technology to post on a forum, before you realise the account is a mere creation of either the admin, or perhaps even the traditional media, that was designed to incite vigorous disputes to those unfortunate enough who cannot see through the 'persona'. Well-played, I say, or perhaps you can decipher binary better, parrot?

Here you go:

011010010111010000100000011010010111001100100000011000010010 000001110011011010000110000101101101011001010010000001110111 011001010010000001100011011000010110111001101110011011110111 010000100000011001000110100101110011011000110110111101110101 011100100111001101100101001000000110100101101110001000000110 010101101110011001110110110001101001011100110110100000101100 001000000111000001100001011100100111001001101111011101000010 1110


And FWIW, I'll say again, yes Collingwood is basically Carlton's "bunny". Not to worry though, we have bigger fish to fry who for some reason we CAN fry. Football is a strange game in that sense.

[one_twelve112]

^^^ Yet you continue to engage?!?! BF is littered with posts of both yourself, and your sidekick smiddaz, being sucked-in over and over again by Parrot. Part of the reason I enjoy BF :thumbsu:

Keep punching

[hellfire]

^^^ Yet you continue to engage?!?! BF is littered with posts of both yourself, and your sidekick smiddaz, being sucked-in over and over again by Parrot. Part of the reason I enjoy BF :thumbsu:

Keep punching

....Ah, no.

I clearly didn't respond to parrot, I was responding to your post.

Keep punching.

[blues2010]

Bit disappointed in this poll. Tried to tick both but not allowed. Here we come, Go Blues, stick it up all the knockers and jealous morons.

[one_twelve112]

....Ah, no.

I clearly didn't respond to parrot, I was responding to your post.

Keep punching.
Post 12 & 15 in this thread :thumbsu:

[hellfire]

Post 12 & 15 in this thread :thumbsu:

Post 12 clearly wasn't responding to what it said.

I don't really care what you think, parrot.



And post 15 was me explaining why we seem to be your "bunnies". With a slight reference to parrot. So....no.

I get a laugh out of it. IF by some chance it really is a person... it's even more hilarious, and worth antagonising to see the mindless rhetoric that is spewed up.

[Krueger]

^^^^^ Speaking of bunnies, looks like Parrot's found a new one.....

Atleast we can respond to the bot in this forum unlike the precious Cartlon board........the posts made by parrot must be some sort of joke right? Surely nobody is delusional enough to actually think what it says??

[Juddernaut08]

Hehe, on second thoughts i think the pies are bunnies to teams that have an elite key forward. (J.Brown, B.Fevola, L.Franklin, M.Pavlich -rest of team lets him down,)

[DTHitman]

collingwood are hacks rofl
expect bulldogs to win by 100+ this week :thumbsu: