View Full Version : Why we can't win this week part 2
carn tigez
18 Jun 2008, 22:04
Because posters like sausage roll will continue to post negative threads about the Tigers and TW even if we win by 100+. If there is nothing at all wrong with our game, they will go on to talking about how we have no chance next week or why we are not improving.
FFS it is "supporters" like these that stop Richmond from getting many decent coaches, because if the coach doesn't get us into finals straight away they call for his head.
I'm not saying we will win this week, but don't give up hope before the teams have even been named! No matter what happens this week, I am sure that the negative posters will find plenty of things to criticise about the club.
Well said, we can't win. If we won the match by 10 goals, we would probably have had a horrible, horrible 3 minute period in which 2 goals were kicked against us in a row :eek:. Having said that, we better ____ing give them a good run.
Well said, we can't win. If we won the match by 10 goals, we would probably have had a horrible, horrible 3 minute period in which 2 goals were kicked in a row. Having said that, we better ____ing give them a good run.I think we can win ... genuinely
In thier heads thier season is over , they will start sending blokes with niggles in to see the surgeon now instead of Sept./Oct. .... they will already be thinking about next year ... Watch the flood of kids come in this week ... rumours about Choco`s future abound
and believe me ... we have everything to play for.
I think we can win ... genuinely
In thier heads thier season is over , they will start sending blokes with niggles in to see the surgeon now instead of Sept./Oct. .... they will already be thinking about next year ... Watch the flood of kids come in this week ... rumours about Choco`s future abound
and believe me ... we have everything to play for.
We're not without a shot. Although it's impossible to tell with Richmond, never know which team will turn up. But surely they haven't conceded their season...if they have nothing to play for, we don't either. We are only 2 points ahead of them, and they are a much, much more proven side than us.
Sausage roll
18 Jun 2008, 22:45
I have never said that we should get rid of TW!
Miller and JON yes, Wallace no.
carn tigez
18 Jun 2008, 22:48
I have never said that we should get rid of TW!
Miller and JON yes, Wallace no.
Not only directed at you, but at all of the negative posters on this board
tigers_of_old_08
18 Jun 2008, 23:03
Because posters like sausage roll will continue to post negative threads about the Tigers and TW even if we win by 100+. If there is nothing at all wrong with our game, they will go on to talking about how we have no chance next week or why we are not improving.
FFS it is "supporters" like these that stop Richmond from getting many decent coaches, because if the coach doesn't get us into finals straight away they call for his head.
I'm not saying we will win this week, but don't give up hope before the teams have even been named! No matter what happens this week, I am sure that the negative posters will find plenty of things to criticise about the club.
Good post carn tigez. As supporters we are meant to do just that - support the club we follow, and exchange constructive posts instead of the rubbish that sausage roll/troll puts up.
With the young, talented group we have playing now we have every reason to expect them to take the game right up to Port Adelaide on Saturday.
Go Tigers
Sausage roll
18 Jun 2008, 23:05
Not only directed at you, but at all of the negative posters on this board
Then don't use my name if it wasn't directed at me.
carn tigez
18 Jun 2008, 23:11
Then don't use my name if it wasn't directed at me.
Not only directed at you, but at all of the negative posters on this board
It was directed partly at you because you were the one that started the thread that i was responding to, but it was also directed at other negative supporters. Does that make sense or do you only understand 2 syllable words?
Sausage roll
18 Jun 2008, 23:21
It was directed partly at you because you were the one that started the thread that i was responding to, but it was also directed at other negative supporters. Does that make sense or do you only understand 2 syllable words?
So it was directed at me amongst others, according to your flawed flogic.
I have never mentioned that Tw should be sacked so don't mention me ( and others) as an example of someone who calls for his head, when I don't?
Too hard for you?
carn tigez
18 Jun 2008, 23:29
So it was directed at me amongst others, according to your flawed flogic.
I have never mentioned that Tw should be sacked so don't mention me ( and others) as an example of someone who calls for his head, when I don't?
Too hard for you?
I never said it wasn't directed at you. I was using you as an example of a person who posts negative threads about the RFC or TW, but the reason i used the word and in my original post was because I was talking about negative posters as a whole. So negative posters, like sausage roll, bag TW and the RFC. I am not saying that you bag TW, I am saying that you are a negative poster. Negative posters bag TW (not all of them). Understand?
Sausage roll
18 Jun 2008, 23:35
I never said it wasn't directed at you. I was using you as an example of a person who posts negative threads about the RFC or TW, but the reason i used the word and in my original post was because I was talking about negative posters as a whole. So negative posters, like sausage roll, bag TW and the RFC. I am not saying that you bag TW, I am saying that you are a negative poster. Negative posters bag TW (not all of them). Understand?
supporters" like these that stop Richmond from getting many decent coaches, because if the coach doesn't get us into finals straight away they call for his head.
I was included in the "like these" supporters who call for his head and I never have.
Understand?
gopower
18 Jun 2008, 23:47
Make sure you're down by about 5 goals at three quarter time and you have a massive chance.
RichosGuns
18 Jun 2008, 23:50
To be fair, alot of posters have reason to be angry, negative and annoyed at the club. FFS we pay up large sums of money each year, to hope (or dream) our team will play finals football year in, year out, and yet it never happens.
Miller, Wallace and in general the Richmond board have made alot of poor errors in managing this club and they should be held accountable to their mistakes.
In short - We have the right to ask questions
carn tigez
18 Jun 2008, 23:51
supporters" like these that stop Richmond from getting many decent coaches, because if the coach doesn't get us into finals straight away they call for his head.
I was included in the "like these" supporters who call for his head and I never have.
Understand?
As i said before i was using you as an example of a negative poster in general, and not as a specific case. SO when i said supporters like these i was talking about negative ones, not you personally.
carn tigez
18 Jun 2008, 23:51
make Sure You're Down By About 5 Goals At Three Quarter Time And You Have A Massive Chance.
:d:d
tigers_of_old_08
19 Jun 2008, 13:36
To be fair, alot of posters have reason to be angry, negative and annoyed at the club. FFS we pay up large sums of money each year, to hope (or dream) our team will play finals football year in, year out, and yet it never happens.
Miller, Wallace and in general the Richmond board have made alot of poor errors in managing this club and they should be held accountable to their mistakes.
In short - We have the right to ask questions
I think we'd all agree with that statement, but when "supporters" like sausage troll continuously rubbish TWs decision to play our youth e.g. repeatedly bagging JON, then such attacks kind of fall outside of that statement. That's all.
tigerdan
19 Jun 2008, 13:44
So it was directed at me amongst others, according to your flawed flogic.
I have never mentioned that Tw should be sacked so don't mention me ( and others) as an example of someone who calls for his head, when I don't?
Too hard for you?
Stop being so bloody precious.
All of your posts are either negative or involve you getting defensive because people are sick of your negative posts.
If you don't want to be picked on, stop making such an ass of yourself.
Surely there is something positive you can post about?
Sausage roll
19 Jun 2008, 14:08
I think we'd all agree with that statement, but when "supporters" like sausage troll continuously rubbish TWs decision to play our youth e.g. repeatedly bagging JON, then such attacks kind of fall outside of that statement. That's all.
Get a grip guys. The snag doesn't bag TW's decision to play youth, just one youth in particular-JON.
I am happy for him to play white, cotchin, edwards etc and have never said anything to the contrary.
If you are going to have a crack at me, get your facts right.
skybeau
19 Jun 2008, 17:25
I am happy for him to play white, cotchin, edwards etc and have never said anything to the contrary.
True enough. All of your posts are either (primarily) bagging JON, or bagging Miller.
No wonder no one gives a shit what you say.
Sausage roll
19 Jun 2008, 18:54
True enough. All of your posts are either (primarily) bagging JON, or bagging Miller.
No wonder no one gives a shit what you say.
That is why so many people respond to my threads. Flog!
If only you knew......you would be very surprised!!