PDA

View Full Version : Well done Brent Macaffer


Bigness
7 Jul 2008, 23:40
No he hasn't been elevated if that is what you were thinking, but I just wanted to say congratulations to him for the way he has developed in his short time at the Pies.

When we think back, he was a TAC team of the year selection, was overlooked in the National draft then picked by the pies as a fairly speculative rookie (I suppose they all are to some extent). In his first year at the pies he spent a lot of time in the Williamstown reserves being tried out in a number of positions. I don't recall him being mentioned in the best too many times.

12 months on and he's really thrown his name up there for senior selection with a series of standout performances in the VFL. At the beginning of this year he wasn't selected for Dubai (I don't think!) and his name was being thrown around as a probable delisting for the end of 2008 by people on this board.

We haven't seen him yet and even if he doesn't make it, his development over the past 12 months is a credit to him and to our development coaches. He's a great example of how quickly players can develop from 'project' type players playing in the VFL reserves, to a player with a genuine chance of debuting at AFL level, in a short space of time.

All the best to him!

Rohan25
7 Jul 2008, 23:50
No he hasn't been elevated if that is what you were thinking,

Haha. That's exactly what I was thinking when I saw the thread title.

16 goals in 4 weeks for 'Caff.

boulos
7 Jul 2008, 23:53
Should be elevated ASAP.

He's clearly done the hard yards, and deserves just rewards.

loki04
8 Jul 2008, 01:45
Should be elevated ASAP.

He's clearly done the hard yards, and deserves just rewards.

agree

DavidInellaFanClub
8 Jul 2008, 03:29
No he hasn't been elevated if that is what you were thinking, but I just wanted to say congratulations to him for the way he has developed in his short time at the Pies.

When we think back, he was a TAC team of the year selection, was overlooked in the National draft then picked by the pies as a fairly speculative rookie (I suppose they all are to some extent). In his first year at the pies he spent a lot of time in the Williamstown reserves being tried out in a number of positions. I don't recall him being mentioned in the best too many times.

12 months on and he's really thrown his name up there for senior selection with a series of standout performances in the VFL. At the beginning of this year he wasn't selected for Dubai (I don't think!) and his name was being thrown around as a probable delisting for the end of 2008 by people on this board.

We haven't seen him yet and even if he doesn't make it, his development over the past 12 months is a credit to him and to our development coaches. He's a great example of how quickly players can develop from 'project' type players playing in the VFL reserves, to a player with a genuine chance of debuting at AFL level, in a short space of time.

All the best to him!

Didnt make the trip to South Africa due to injury

Dogs_Playing_Poker
8 Jul 2008, 08:56
Should be elevated for sure!! Looks a likely type in the mould of a Ryan O'Keefe...

Kirby
8 Jul 2008, 09:14
I agree he's going well and good on him. I hope he continues to improve but there is no need to elevate him to the main list unless he gets picked to play in the ones. The incentive is there for him for the rest of the year.

shawthing09
8 Jul 2008, 11:55
I agree he's going well and good on him. I hope he continues to improve but there is no need to elevate him to the main list unless he gets picked to play in the ones. The incentive is there for him for the rest of the year.

Agree with this.

I also have a feeling that he is just on the wrong list. At the pies his competing with a few players in his size and mould medhurst thomas even ruz who have a bit over him.

It is also easier for the smarter fowards with less size and athletism at vfl level then AFL level i think. To put it into perspective a guy like Aaron Edwards who is handy to good at AFL level kicked something like 120 goals in a season at VFL level. I think Caff is a good player but I don't know if his tools are enough to carry into AFL.

ralu
8 Jul 2008, 13:41
Agree with this.

I also have a feeling that he is just on the wrong list. At the pies his competing with a few players in his size and mould medhurst thomas even ruz who have a bit over him.

It is also easier for the smarter fowards with less size and athletism at vfl level then AFL level i think. To put it into perspective a guy like Aaron Edwards who is handy to good at AFL level kicked something like 120 goals in a season at VFL level. I think Caff is a good player but I don't know if his tools are enough to carry into AFL.

spot on. great post.

dont think macaffer will ever play for the pies

The Dawes
8 Jul 2008, 13:46
Agree with this.

I also have a feeling that he is just on the wrong list. At the pies his competing with a few players in his size and mould medhurst thomas even ruz who have a bit over him.

It is also easier for the smarter fowards with less size and athletism at vfl level then AFL level i think. To put it into perspective a guy like Aaron Edwards who is handy to good at AFL level kicked something like 120 goals in a season at VFL level. I think Caff is a good player but I don't know if his tools are enough to carry into AFL.

Good point re the competition for a spot on our list - but if we elevate him, he will provide additional depth and might be helpful as trade bait down the track.

Thing is, we don't really know if he'll make it at AFL level if he doesn't get a chance.

Teak_Pies
8 Jul 2008, 14:54
Get him the bloody team MM.

mattys123
8 Jul 2008, 15:16
He will be elevated, it is just a matter of time.

A few reasons why this will happen;

1. He deserves it after this years performances at VFL level.
2. Come end of year (draft time) and we have not elevated him, someone will pick him in the draft.
3. With injury concerns long term over rusling and rocca, more depth in the forward line cant hurt.
4. At end of year, we will have room to elevate him, delisting / retiring of 5-6 players will see to this.

Similar to Dawes, Thoolen, McCarthy, i dont really see it as necessary to give him a senior game this year, as the Nathan Brown scenario has shown.

The Royal Sampler
8 Jul 2008, 15:38
MacAffer is certainly to be congratulated on his recent form.

I disagree with those saying he shouldn't be promoted as he is too similar to our other medium forwards. He has some similarity to Medhurst, granted, but he is very different to Rusling and has far better ability in picking up the ground ball. Frankly, Rusling is far from a certainty to get through an AFL season given his atrocious run with injury. Making list decisions based upon what Rusling already offers us is rather short-sighted, IMHO.

I think we should lean toward retaining anyone who has shown some ability and the right attitude, MacAffer has both.

MagpieGirl_13
8 Jul 2008, 15:44
He had been on our list for a while now so I thought that if he didn't start performing he will probably be delisted at the end of the season. However, I'm SO glad that he has picked up the pace & found some really good form by the sounds of things. I hope he gets the reward he deserves!
If he does come out & play soon, I really hope that people keep the harsh comments (if any) to a minimum. If he doesn't live up to expectations on the first appearance, he'll probably get better.

brspdt201013
8 Jul 2008, 15:52
Would prefer Dawes to be given a game first.

shawthing09
8 Jul 2008, 15:57
MacAffer is certainly to be congratulated on his recent form.

I disagree with those saying he shouldn't be promoted as he is too similar to our other medium forwards. He has some similarity to Medhurst, granted, but he is very different to Rusling and has far better ability in picking up the ground ball. Frankly, Rusling is far from a certainty to get through an AFL season given his atrocious run with injury. Making list decisions based upon what Rusling already offers us is rather short-sighted, IMHO.

I think we should lean toward retaining anyone who has shown some ability and the right attitude, MacAffer has both.

His ability of the ground is better then Ruslings but no better then Medhurst who is probably the most similar to him on our list. My mentioning of Ruz was more in terms of the role that he would play / has been playing best.

If Ruz was the only one it would be different but Thomas and Medders too. Who are both way ahead of both Caff and Ruz.

Also what I was more pointing out is that I don't know if his strengths are good enough at AFL level that said only time and oppertunity will tell. I just think it is easy to see him preforming consistantly at VFL and wonder why he doesn't get a game in the big time. But the fact is I don't think at this stage he has the tools to preform at AFL level.

I simply don't think he should be promoted this year unless he is getting a game which unless our injury count gets worse (knock on wood.) I don't think he will get. At years end i still think he has probably earnt a seniors spot although second half of the year his form would need to continue.

Timmy from Thomastown
8 Jul 2008, 16:02
Needs a game soon.

September Action
8 Jul 2008, 23:46
Is Ruz even going to make it back?? My mail is that he is finished - I hope that's wrong but it came from a mate who is good friends with Mama and Papa Ruz.

loki04
8 Jul 2008, 23:54
Is Ruz even going to make it back?? My mail is that he is finished - I hope that's wrong but it came from a mate who is good friends with Mama and Papa Ruz.


so we are gonna just pay him out a 3 year contract for nothing?


Highly doubtful..

September Action
9 Jul 2008, 00:02
As I say - hope my mail is wrong b/c I loved watching him in last year's finals but if his shoulder is not up to it, it doesn't matter how long his contract is. My mate from SA is good friends with the family who are apparently not very optimistic.

Godfrey Jones
9 Jul 2008, 04:34
damn man i hope you're source is full of shit

skelly12
9 Jul 2008, 07:49
Don't necessarily think he's a Thomas/Medhurst/Rusling as has been mentioned. Sure he is quick off the lead and has a good grab but he doesn't have the ability to work players under the ball like Medders/ the flamboyance of Thomas or the one dimensional style of game like Rusling (nothing wrong with that though, although you can only have one of these players in a team). If Caff is retained and elevated I would think he would develop into a Ryan O'keefe style of player, he has the potential to develop a large motor and is dangerous around goals. I played alot of underage footy with him and his ability to gut run, accelerate and kick goals from stoppages/on the run was phenomonal.