PDA

View Full Version : News GC17 deal uncertain amid world financial crisis


Cap
10 Oct 2008, 08:25
Damian Barrett | October 09, 2008 11:30pm

Have your say!Add your comments or read what others are sayingEmail Article Share Add to Digg Add to del.icio.us Post to NewsVine Post to Facebook What are these? Printer friendly Text size+- THE global financial crisis could force an AFL rethink on the timing of Gold Coast's entry to the national competition. It has long been considered fait accompli that Monday's AFL Commission meeting would rubber-stamp the licence bid by the Gold Coast consortium, but the issue is now set for extended consideration.

The Gold Coast's two major investment management firms, MFS and City Pacific, along with major developer Raptis, have collapsed in recent months, causing major job losses and the abandonment of significant works projects.

With this backdrop, the AFL has managed to entice just $10 million - from Gold Coast council - of the at least $200 million it requires to build a new stadium in the region.

Asked if the worldwide economic crisis had changed the Gold Coast outlook, AFL chief commercial officer Gillon McLachlan said: "I can't comment on that. They (GC17) have done a hell of a job and I hear they have met all criteria, but I haven't seen the report and ultimately I can not speak for the commission."

GC17 will make its final presentation to commissioners on Monday, confident it has met strict criteria established in April for AFL entry by 2011.

Group heavies John Witheriff and Graeme Downie will pitch for the AFL's 17th licence and leave with the nine commissioners a 400-page document outlining the group's business plan.

McLachlan said commissioners would likely require at least two weeks, and maybe four, to analyse the bid in light of all economic developments.

Collingwood president Eddie McGuire was the first official at club level to warn that football would be hit by slowing economies throughout the world, and that as a result the game needed to "take cautious steps".

Last night, from New York, McGuire reiterated those concerns.

"I said a long time ago the world economic crisis was going to hit everybody, and it is hitting everybody," McGuire said.

"But, in times like this, cash is king, and the AFL has cash.

"At Collingwood, we support the AFL in whatever it chooses to do with this, having got itself in the right position at the right time to make the right decision."

Even in the absence of the licence, GC17 has appointed a coach, Guy McKenna, and recruiting manager, Scott Clayton, to oversee the club during what has been forecast as its formative years in the under-18 TAC Cup competition in 2009, and the VFL in 2010.

Witheriff, who could not be contacted yesterday, is expected to tell the commission on Monday he is confident GC17 has met the criteria, which included:

$5 MILLION in sponsorship;

20,000 "committed supporters";

111 SPONSORS, including a naming rights sponsor (with the AFL standard set at at least $1 million), 10 second-tier sponsors ($250-$350,000 each) and 100 business supporters.

GC17 will actually tell the AFL it has 40,000 "committed supporters".

The Herald Sun has learnt the AFL, should it award the licence to GC17, is forecasting just 10,000 members for 2011, and aims to double that figure by 2016.

In May, before the world financial crisis took hold, AFL chief executive Andrew Demetriou told the Herald Sun the Gold Coast club would "cost the competition, over a five-year period, starting in 2011, probably somewhere around $65-$70 million".

That figure was based on the yearly dividend to all clubs as well as millions of dollars of extra annual assistance.

Demetriou said the club would need "at least $20-to-$25 million over a five-year period on top of what the normal (club) distribution will be", and even that injection of extra funds would not produce a break-even result until the fifth year at the earliest.

"I don't want to go there (how much the club will lose in initial years), as it depends on a number of factors, but it is not unusual in any business to lose money early," Demetriou said.

McLachlan, the league's executive in charge of the Gold Coast project, would not comment yesterday on the progress of talks with federal, state and local governments relating to a football stadium being built.


makes for interesting reading, personally I think its a bit of a beat up.

Father Jack
10 Oct 2008, 08:46
A fair bit of conjecture mixed in with some wishful thinking I reckon. I think that if the AFL doesn't go with the GC now, they may as well forget about the region forever.

Stereophonic
10 Oct 2008, 11:32
Reading the article, there is a lot of 'I cant comment", ... is expected to etc etc, there is many assumptions in that article and not a lot of sources that carry the story, sounds like an opinion piece designed to create a li'll controversy.

I would not really read too much into this article.

Its a done deal....

CoastBhoy
10 Oct 2008, 15:00
I rate Damien Barrett as a journo , but this is a terrible article with alot of ifs and maybe's.

stuart27
10 Oct 2008, 19:09
Pfft. The AFL are warming up their rubber-stamping hand as we speak.

West Sydney might need to jump a few more hurdles if the economy is still screwy, but nothing will stop GC17 from joining the party now.

Congrats in advance for Monday, guys.

Funkalicous
13 Oct 2008, 08:29
Australia has a strong economy. The dollar will bounce back before 2011.

campbell
13 Oct 2008, 15:19
I rate Damien Barrett as a journo , but this is a terrible article with alot of ifs and maybe's.

except when it comes to the GC. He is so anti GC due to his North passion, it seems to cloud what he says at bet. You would hate to think, he writes stiff to be anti gc.

samiam
14 Oct 2008, 21:11
GC17 will actually tell the AFL it has 40,000 "committed supporters".


Supporters? Yes. Committed? No.

You sign your name on a web pages to become one. Then you sign again to help GC17. In fact, you can repeat it ad infinitum.

Difficult to see how that system, which commits the supporter to nothing, despite the claim, and is open to mass abuse, can be relied on for anything other than a number to look good in a press release.

CoastBhoy
14 Oct 2008, 21:18
Supporters? Yes. Committed? No.

You sign your name on a web pages to become one. Then you sign again to help GC17. In fact, you can repeat it ad infinitum.

Difficult to see how that system, which commits the supporter to nothing, despite the claim, and is open to mass abuse, can be relied on for anything other than a number to look good in a press release.

40,000 people have taken the time to support the club and fill out there form , will we get 40,000 members bang first up ? of course not , but it shows the amount of people that want this club here.

kimp
17 Oct 2008, 12:39
I am genuinely interested in this whole process and am impressed with how the club and AFL are managing to build a little community out of nothing. Just wondering how the club promoted signing up on the website?