PDA

View Full Version : Watch out Janevski......


mandy
14 Oct 2002, 10:15
Laws to trap cyberstalkers
By IAN HABERFIELD
13oct02

CYBERSTALKERS will face up to 10 years' jail under tough new laws to be announced by Attorney-General Rob Hulls today.

In an Australian first, Victoria's Crimes Act will be amended to cover e-mail communication, the manipulation of the operating system on another person's computer, and the publishing of offensive material electronically.
"It's widely recognised that the development of new technologies, particularly the Internet, provide new ways for stalkers to locate, contact and potentially harm their victims," Mr Hulls said.

"That's why we are introducing Australia's first anti-cyberstalking legislation.

"Posting false information about a person, impersonating another person in chat sites, tracing a person's steps through the Internet, up-loading offensive or doctored images of a person to websites or providing personal information online will all be covered by these reforms.

"Since cyberstalking can occur from anywhere in the world, the reforms have been extended to allow extra-territorial operation."

Mr Hulls said there had been a dramatic increase in stalking complaints in Victoria.

"Between 1995-96 and 2000-01 the number of stalking complaints increased by 282 per cent, from 1391 to 5318," he said.

"A small number of those complaints involved e-mail harassment, but there have been a growing number of cases overseas that underlined the need to ensure that Victoria's laws are equipped to handle cyberstalking.

"That means the Bracks Government's cyberstalking laws will apply to people living interstate or overseas if they are found to be stalking a person residing in Victoria, or a person living in Victoria who uses technology to stalk a victim residing interstate or overseas."

Mr Hulls said current provisions did not deal with cases of stalking in which a victim might be followed and in very real danger, but unaware of the threat.

"This new legislation will remove the requirement that the victim be aware of the stalking behaviour in order for it to be considered an offence," Mr Hulls said.

The Crimes Act currently defines stalking as a persistent course of conduct undertaken with the intention of causing harm or of instilling apprehension or fear in a person and carries a maximum penalty of 10 years' jail.

Ma-lby
15 Oct 2002, 01:00
Originally posted by mandy5
1. Posting false information about a person
2. providing personal information online will all be covered by these reforms.

I particularly like these 2 points. I'm sure this Janevski dude would too. :p

I doubt many Colliwobble supporters will be worried about these new laws, as most of them are already on the run from the law, or already in jail.

MGREG
15 Oct 2002, 01:45
Originally posted by Ma-lby


I particularly like these 2 points. I'm sure this Janevski dude would too. :p

I doubt many Colliwobble supporters will be worried about these new laws, as most of them are already on the run from the law, or already in jail.

**** off Janevski.

Too cowardly to visit Vic Par Tavern lately.

Ma-lby
15 Oct 2002, 01:57
Originally posted by MGREG


**** off Janevski.

Too cowardly to visit Vic Par Tavern lately.

Maybe this janevski dude doesn't like golf? hmm them net laws sure are interesting.

MGREG
15 Oct 2002, 02:06
Originally posted by Ma-lby


Maybe this janevski dude doesn't like golf? hmm them net laws sure are interesting.


You are still a coward to appear there cos you get your arse kicked EVERYTIME and I mean EVERYTIME.

Perhaps if you knew a bit more about the internet you may succees but you are an imbecile John, and EPPING imbecile!

To quote you


bwahahahahahahahahahahahaahaha!

Spidergirl~RiCkChiCk
17 Oct 2002, 15:08
that's great news, have suffered this form of harrassment on here before!

mandy
17 Oct 2002, 21:51
Originally posted by Spidergirl~RiCkChiCk
that's great news, have suffered this form of harrassment on here before!

It's about time, huh? It's totally unbelievable to me what these cowards think they can say about others on bulletin boards, or even going so far as to defame people on manufactured websites. Hopefully soon there will be clear guidelines of protection against these no-life freaks.

MGREG
17 Oct 2002, 22:09
Originally posted by mandy5


It's about time, huh? It's totally unbelievable to me what these cowards think they can say about others on bulletin boards, or even going so far as to defame people on manufactured websites. Hopefully soon there will be clear guidelines of protection against these no-life freaks.

Exactly Mandy. Cowards like this "thing" are probably running scared already.

mandy
17 Oct 2002, 23:26
Originally posted by MGREG


Exactly Mandy. Cowards like this "thing" are probably running scared already.

You'd hope so, but "it" wasn't too scared to pop up this week with the new user name "Ma-lby". It's this crap when he involves my child that gets to me. And it's for this reason I'll take it further.

daicos4ever
17 Oct 2002, 23:42
I heard Janevski went outside to get the paper this morning....

Spidergirl~RiCkChiCk
18 Oct 2002, 01:42
Originally posted by mandy5


It's about time, huh? It's totally unbelievable to me what these cowards think they can say about others on bulletin boards, or even going so far as to defame people on manufactured websites. Hopefully soon there will be clear guidelines of protection against these no-life freaks.


I personally wouldn't bother bringing up the old ***** that happened to me on here because i have already been to court over it to sought legal advice and was told that the actions in 'real life' can be acted upon yet the further harrassment that resulted from the internet couldn't as there weren't laws in place for it yet (at that stage). If it happened again though where my private details were put up here and i was impersonated on a site then i would prob act on it problem is though who gets sued if its said on bigfooty because i wouldn't want Bluey to be deemed responsible for something someone else has said that he has no control over?