PDA

View Full Version : Clark shock at Australia call-up


Dez!
12 Apr 2009, 12:34
So unprepared was Stuart Clark for selection on Australia's limited overs tour of South Africa, he did not have a passport when the call came. "I've just spent the day organising another one," he said. "My original passport is still at the British consulate."

Clark had been preparing to fly to England this week for a county stint with Kent, for whom he was to debut on April 21 in a County Championship match against Northamptonshire. But those plans were scuppered with a surprise phone call from Michael Brown, Cricket Australia's operations manager, on Friday night, instructing him to pack his bags for South Africa and, afterwards, the UAE.

"I almost fell off my chair when I got the call," Clark told Cricinfo. "I hadn't planned on it happening at all. I had just assumed my one-day international career was in the past, and while I was disappointed by that, I was just concentrating on the other forms of the game. This really came out of the blue, and I'm very excited about it. It's a real chance for me to get back into the one-day team on a more regular basis."

Clark's call-up came after Brett Geeves fractured his left foot during Australia's 25-run defeat to South Africa in Cape Town on Thursday. He will arrive in South Africa on Sunday, and is likely to make his return to one-day international cricket in the fifth and final match at the Wanderers next Friday.

Clark has not represented Australia at limited-overs level since September last year, and appeared to have slipped well back in the pecking order. But injuries to key fast bowling personnel has presented him with an opportunity to add to his 36-game resume, and gain valuable exposure to international cricket in his comeback from elbow surgery.

Clark expected that comeback would be made through the county ranks; a move that prompted outrage among many within English cricket, given the likelihood of him playing a senior role in this year's Ashes series. The veteran paceman is still amenable to the idea of playing with Kent after Australia's one-day series against Pakistan in the UAE, but his original deal was due to end on May 31 so the new time frame would leave him with just a handful of matches.

"I'm not quite sure what will happen with Kent," Clark said. "I was prepared to fly there in the next week. I would still like to play there, but I have to be realistic. They might be looking for someone to play for the whole season. We'll cross that bridge when we come to it after I get back from Dubai."

Paul Millman, the Kent chief executive, admitted that the county would have to start making new plans. "We will be looking at our options over the weekend," he told Cricinfo. "Obviously we are delighted for Stuart and this is something you have to prepare for when you sign big players. We will let Stuart settle in South Africa and then be in contact."

Why? Don't get me wrong, Clark's a gun with a red ball not a white ball.

Besides let the bloke prepare for the Ashes, we've got other fast bowlers to choose from why pick a recovering Clark who doesn't exactly set the world fire in ODI cricket.

*EDIT*
Damn it, Weevil or CJ can either of you fix the title.

ManWithNoName
12 Apr 2009, 15:01
Don't see the point of this. It'd make more sense to let him get ready for the Ashes in County Cricket.

Cousin Jed
12 Apr 2009, 16:48
Damn it, Weevil or CJ can either of you fix the title.


Done.

I think it was almost a case of so little options to choose from here, as long as he can get the bowling into him he needs to try and be an options for the Ashes I don't really mind.

DOCKERZ
12 Apr 2009, 17:25
Would have thought Magoffin might have been worth a run at SA or UAE... :cool:

weevil
12 Apr 2009, 18:09
I have no problem with getting some high end cricket into him.

Gunnar Longshanks
12 Apr 2009, 19:25
And, to be fair, his record in ODIs isn't as bad as many are making out.

50 wickets at 27 is respectable.

weevil
12 Apr 2009, 19:28
Yeah I think people are comparing him to Pigeon and Bing in their prime.

DIG
12 Apr 2009, 20:47
I think it's a mistake.

He'll play all of 1 game, for max 10 overs with a white ball - what's the point of that?

He's not in the squad for Pakistan, is longer part of our ODI future, and now Kent are likely to scrap his contract given he could now only be available for a few games.

Surely a string of matches for Kent, getting overs into him and used to the conditions would've been far better prep for him.

Bennycoff
13 Apr 2009, 10:00
He is in the squad for the Pakistan series now, replacing Geeves.

OzBomber
13 Apr 2009, 16:39
Let him play county cricket. I'd prefer having Lee in the team.

DoubleO7
13 Apr 2009, 17:10
Let him play county cricket. I'd prefer having Lee in the team.
Ditto, except the the preference of Lee ahead of Clark in the national side.

OzBomber
13 Apr 2009, 17:30
Ditto, except the the preference of Lee ahead of Clark in the national side.
I'd prefer having Clark ahead of Lee in tests, but in limited overs I believe Lee is a far better bowler.

DoubleO7
13 Apr 2009, 17:34
I'd prefer having Clark ahead of Lee in tests, but in limited overs I believe Lee is a far better bowler.
Yeah, that's what I was alluding, I should have added Tests to my post.:thumbsu:

Lee is definitely a better ODI bowler, no doubt about it.