PDA

View Full Version : Australia's Match Against Zimbabwe Under Threat Yet Again


St-KriS
3 Feb 2003, 13:26
POTCHEFSTROOM, South Africa, Feb 2 AAP - Australia's World Cup match against Zimbabwe is under serious threat after the federal government received a warning today about the likelihood of protests and violence.

Australian Cricket Board chief executive James Sutherland, general manager Michael Brown and players' representative Tim May were due to arrive in South Africa tomorrow and they will address players on growing safety fears.

"At this stage we'll have further understanding of the situation when James Sutherland, Tim May and Michael Brown arrive," said an ACB spokesman.

"They're scheduled to discuss the match with the Australian High Commissioner to Zimbabwe over the course of the next few days. Those discussions will form part of the ACB's ongoing assessment of the safety and security situation in Zimbabwe."

Foreign Minister Alexander Downer said the fixture on February 24 should be re-located after Australia's High Commissioner to Zimbabwe informed the federal government that Zimbabwean police were refusing to guarantee a controlled response to protests.

Mr Downer said High Commissioner Jonathan Brown had sent the government a "disturbing report" from a two-day reconnaissance to Bulawayo, where opposition parties and other groups intending to protest were likely to be met aggressively by police.

"His report says, firstly, that the opposition in Bulawayo don't want the cricket game to go ahead," Mr Downer said in Adelaide.

"Secondly, he believes there will be demonstrations mounted by the opposition and others in Bulawayo at the time of the game.

"Thirdly, he has ... been unable to get a commitment from the Zimbabwean police that they won't react to demonstrators in a disproportionately aggressive way, thereby undermining the security situation."

The government will pass on Brown's report to the ACB and International Cricket Council, said Mr Downer, who estimated 400 Australians had purchased tickets for the match.

"There won't only be the Australian cricketers and their support staff, there will be quite a number of Australians present at the game as spectators," Mr Downer said.

"So we naturally remain concerned about the security situation.

"It is our view that the International Cricket Council should move the games from Zimbabwe to more appropriate locations in Africa."

Mr Downer also said the government had requested information about any Al-Qaeda link in Zimbabwe.

"I haven't been aware of this before," he said.

"We are aware of Al-Qaeda operating in the neighbouring Kenya but I'm not personally aware of Al-Qaeda in Zimbabwe," he said.

A US Government briefing has reportedly detailed a plan by Tablik Ja'maat, an Al-Qaeda-linked group of militant extremists, to attack US targets in Zimbabwe if war was declared on Iraq.

Other attacks would take place in Pakistan, Indonesia, Nigeria, Turkey, South Africa and Israel, according to the report.

Australia will forfeit competition points if it boycotts the game and the ICC doesn't stage it elsewhere.

"We haven't heard anything new," said Zimbabwe coach and former Australian Test batsman Geoff Marsh.

"We've heard so much over the last few weeks it's starting to become water off a duck's back."

http://www-aus.cricket.org/link_to_database/ARCHIVE/CRICKET_NEWS/2003/FEB/131447_AAP_02FEB2003.html


ahh im getting sick of this...I wish they would just make up there minds already.

Becker
4 Feb 2003, 06:22
Originally posted by St-KriS

ahh im getting sick of this...I wish they would just make up there minds already.

Best comment I've heard so far.

ScouseCat
4 Feb 2003, 08:13
Personally, I think Australia will play their match in Zimbabwe unless the situation in that country gets worse between now and the time we're due to play there.

roostersgal4eva
4 Feb 2003, 13:02
Originally posted by Becker
Best comment I've heard so far.

i second that

I dont want them to go because safety NOT politics

Becker
6 Feb 2003, 06:29
Originally posted by roostersgal4eva
i second that

I dont want them to go because safety NOT politics

I think the players would be safe because the eyes of the world will be on Robert Mugabe and he won't want an international incident on his hands.

The reason I don't want Australia there is we would be seen to be supporting the blood thirsty Mugabe regime.

ScouseCat
6 Feb 2003, 08:25
Originally posted by Becker
The reason I don't want Australia there is we would be seen to be supporting the blood thirsty Mugabe regime.

We are there to play a game of cricket, politics shouldn't even come into it. As long as player safety can be assured, I don't have a problem with us playing in Zimbabwe.

Bomber Spirit
7 Feb 2003, 16:55
If Australia win their first 3 games, I expect they'll forfeit at the last minute. But if they lose one of those games they'll kick up a stink then play under protest - maybe with a charter flight dropping them off at the ground on game day and picking them up at the ground within minutes of the game finishing.

If we forfeit the game, do Zimbabwe get the bonus point as well as the game?


I hope we don't play there. Even if it was conclusively stated that playing there was not supporting Mugabe and everyone accepted that, there's anarchy and starvation and all sorts of ugly things going on there - and with cricket being maybe seen as the game of white privelege it would be an obvious target.
If anything did happen, I doubt the ICC could live with themselves.

DaveW
7 Feb 2003, 18:08
Originally posted by Bomber Spirit
If we forfeit the game, do Zimbabwe get the bonus point as well as the game?

What bonus point?

clucas91
8 Feb 2003, 01:04
The game should go ahead regardless, either that or give the Zimbabwe Cricket Board a whole wad of cash in lost revenue.

The only losers in these sorts of issues are the individual nations cricket boards (Kenya and Zimbabwe) and the worldwide promotion of the game itself.

Jim Boy
8 Feb 2003, 06:35
Originally posted by clucas91
The game should go ahead regardless, either that or give the Zimbabwe Cricket Board a whole wad of cash in lost revenue.


Actually if what I've read is true, its the ICC that will lose a whole wad of cash. It seems Murdoch paid over the odds ($US500 million for two world cups) and is looking for an excuse to pull out. Failure to play in Zimbabwe may just allow that.

St-KriS
8 Feb 2003, 06:51
Originally posted by Jim Boy
Actually if what I've read is true, its the ICC that will lose a whole wad of cash

That's the thing isnt it? Im sure the ICC do have some concerns about player safety, but there more concerned about the money they will make or lose.