PDA

View Full Version : Daily Player reviews #7 Marc Dragicevic


oh_my_hat
8 Feb 2003, 12:58
One of the guys who is in a Tigers e-mail loop with me at work is putting together a one-a-day player critique starting at #1 and working through the player list. It's a pretty good read so I thought I would share it with you.

Part 7 in the series….


7 - Marc Dragicevic

Position: Small Forward (Potentially Midfield)
Age: Hard to believe but come Round 1 - Draga is still only 21!! (22 two days later).
Height: 179
Weight: 80
Career Games: 43
Career Goals: 24
Draft History: Select 55 in the 1998 Draft as our only 17yo pick. That year everyone was allowed one 17yo, our first pick was 40 when I think everyone (or nearly everyone) had already picked theirs, so effectively Draga was more like about pick 20.

2002 Averages: Did Not Play after suffering a second Knee reco in the pre-season comp.

Previously: Managed 5 games into 2001 before Knee number 1 goes just shortly after he turned 20. Hadn't really set the house on fire up to that stage, but had looked ready for a year of improvement. 2001 was hoped to be the year he started to develop into someone who would spend more time on the ground and gradually take a midfield spot. Played 21 games as a 19yo in 2000 for 16 goals and an average of 7.6 disposals a game, 17 games as an 18yo in 1999 for 6 goals and 9.5 disposals per game in a very impressive debut season. Both years was predominately run off the bench, so given the age and the lack of game time the numbers weren't that bad. The only reserves game I can remember him play in that time he was completely dominate with a 30+ touch game.

Ability: 4.5 - Harsh, Prior to the two knees I had no doubt Draga was above average - he just had to prove it. He didn't get the chance to prove it and I'm a bit sceptical on players ability to survive 2 Knee recons. Looked a natural footballer, but kicking style seemed a bit "off" to me.

Offence: 5.5 - Did prove in the limited time he has put in so far that he has the capability to get to contests front and square pick up loose ball in the forward 50 and finish. Conversion rate was pretty good.

Defence: 3.5 - Below average but in fairness hasn't really had much of a chance to show this side. Did show he was prepared to work pretty hard back and (IMHO) was a pretty strong tackler for his size with good technique. Still looked like he'd never really covered anyone in his footy life and while he might have tried to do the right thing, didn't really seem to know how to do it all that well.

Hardness: 4 - Which isn't bad for a relatively small 19yo - which is effectively what he's being rated on. I don't have much to say he's not hard, again just not enough evidence yet.

Speed: 5 - I put him as average, memory is a bit faded and probably quicker than average, but given 2 knees - we'll wait and see.

Stamina: 5 - See above.

Delivery: 5.5 - Slightly above average, occasionally floated them up, which maturity and strength would have helped him a bit with.

Air: 3.5 - Not a hack, but no great marking target.

Ground: 5 - Average, no real discernable weakness - did manage to keep his feet - gets to a contest pretty well and pretty good below his knees.

Injury: 2 - The fact he had two relatively injury free years in 99/00 are the only reason he didn't get a zero.

Ruck: 0 - Draga's first knee injury in 2001 cost him a perfect record - he had managed to record a hit out each season previously. I think these statisticians need their eyes tested!

Temperament: 5 - O.K. If you hadn't guessed, I'm coping out a lot here and just putting average all the time. Realistically given what he's been through and the way he appears to be coming out of it he will rate much higher, and maybe Draga if he ever keeps the body in one piece is a future club leader, however my memory of a 19yo is nothing much either way. Did seem to have the "mad stare" going a couple of times from memory.

Ball: 4 - Probably a factor of lack of opportunities on the ground, but hasn't been the ball winner he looks like he should be. If he manages to settle down in a side (Seniors or Seconds) in a spot for a while we'll get a better bead on this.

Strengths: Made the contest pretty well, technically looked pretty good, tackling was noticeably "efficient" for his size and looked a "natural" footballer with some footy smarts.

Weaknesses: His body just keeps failing him, occasionally would float his kicks and I was never sure if he had the running ability to become a gun midfielder.

Overall: Allright - I'll be perfectly honest, I have no idea if Dragicevic can play or not - end of story. My memories are a bit dim of what he could do and how he could do it, so pretty much everything you've read so far is complete made up dribble. We saw the first half of his total AFL career and have completely missed the second half. The "Kid" is still only 21, has played 43 games predominately as a teenager and in the 2 years where he should be making the step from apprentice to fully fledged senior player - he cops two Knee Reco's. There's no way I'd have judged him on 99/00 other than being encouraged he could cope at that level at all, but 01/02 were the years we got to really see if he was "on-track". I couldn't see any other club being interested in trading anything of value for him, we've invested a fair bit into him already by nursing him through the last two years. Draga will be value if he can stay upright for a season and play some moderate football. He won't have to star, just look capable of holding a senior spot, then 2004 hopefully will be a year he shows what he can or can't do. I have one big wish for Draga from the Coaching staff - DO NOT PLAY HIM IN THE SENIORS FOR AT LEAST 6 WEEKS! This guy has spent his whole career either limping or playing 10-15 minutes on a flank in the seniors. 5-6 weeks at Coburg and lets wait until he has a few BOG's and confidence that he can really play before bringing him up the firsts. And only bring him up when we have a realistic role for him there - not just encouragement off the bench. Just coming up to 22 he is 2 years behind in his football development because of injuries and probably further behind because he hasn't had enough grounding in the seconds.

What he needs to do?
1) Stay upright and intact.
2) Gain confidence at Coburg first before returning to seniors.
3) Get a highlights tape of him put up on Foxtel so we can remember what he plays like.

CJH
8 Feb 2003, 16:23
At pick #55, Draga was another of the low risk gambles taken by the Richmond Football Club. As a junior with the Geelong Falcons, he was troubled by groin - or somesuch - injuries which was part of the reason why he was left for so long. Also contributing to this was that his father - who was apparently an above average local footballer - also suffered from big knee injuries when he played.

If it were ability alone as a criteria for selection in the draft, Draga would have definitely been top 20, maybe even top 10. Clubs weren't prepared to take that risk though on someone who may well turn out to be a liability injury-wise.

History has shown that they were wise in this respect - though we haven't been too badly burnt as it has only cost us a low draft pick.

On the other side of the coin, what I saw of Draga in the first 2 years showed that he did have the ability to justify a higer selection. I would not be too concerned if his kicking ability was 'off' - what mattered was that his field passing invariable hit it's target.

This is the only thing that enables Draga to hold onto his AFL career. The promise of ability.

If - big IF - he can keep himself on the park, he will have what is required to repay the faith that we have had in him. Another big knee injury and it will be good-night nurse!

Harry Bosch
8 Feb 2003, 19:28
Originally posted by CJH
At pick #55, Draga was another of the low risk gambles taken by the Richmond Football Club. As a junior with the Geelong Falcons, he was troubled by groin - or somesuch - injuries which was part of the reason why he was left for so long. Also contributing to this was that his father - who was apparently an above average local footballer - also suffered from big knee injuries when he played.

If it were ability alone as a criteria for selection in the draft, Draga would have definitely been top 20, maybe even top 10. Clubs weren't prepared to take that risk though on someone who may well turn out to be a liability injury-wise.

History has shown that they were wise in this respect - though we haven't been too badly burnt as it has only cost us a low draft pick.

On the other side of the coin, what I saw of Draga in the first 2 years showed that he did have the ability to justify a higer selection. I would not be too concerned if his kicking ability was 'off' - what mattered was that his field passing invariable hit it's target.

This is the only thing that enables Draga to hold onto his AFL career. The promise of ability.

If - big IF - he can keep himself on the park, he will have what is required to repay the faith that we have had in him. Another big knee injury and it will be good-night nurse!

Pretty much agree there , i think he was rated by some as high as the 6th best kid in that draft and was taken so low because of the injury problems you mention plus the one 17 year old rule back then. I would rate him behind Ottens as the secobnd most talented younger player at the club..Has anyone seen him at training and seen how pacey he looks ie does he look to have lost any pace or mobility???

Rodan#18.
13 Feb 2003, 12:21
Originally posted by Harry Bosch
I would rate him behind Ottens as the second most talented younger player at the club.

Gee he'd have some competition. See my signature.

Crumden
19 Feb 2003, 15:27
I tore out a page from the Herald Sun dated 29 October 1998, the day before the draft that year, and still have it in my drawer at work. (Not sure why, just never chucked it out). It has their predicted top 20 for the draft. Dragicevic is at 14 with the following blurb:

"14. Marc Dragicevic
30/03/81, Geelong Falcons, 181cm 74kg
A highly-skilled and clever midfielder who dominated with the Geelong Falcons in the TAC Cup this season. Another 17-year-old whose great hands and smart playmaking will see him taken early."

Rodan#18.
20 Feb 2003, 08:05
i remeber that page...james white was also on it...we took him too...he had a bad attitude.

Crumden
21 Feb 2003, 09:16
You're right. James White was predicted to go at 18

18 James White
21/10/80, Oakleigh Chargers, 181cm 71 kg
Talented half-forward flanker wha has exceptional goal sense. Still a bit wiry but has the fitness and the committment of a fututre AFL player as he often trained with his school team and then with Oakleigh. Represented Vic Metro at under-18 canival and had a good year with the luckless Chargers in the TAC Cup.

CLIFF YOUNG
21 Feb 2003, 10:43
Marc Dragicevic is the best 'Daicos like' kick for goal at the club...better than Krakeour!