View Full Version : Ryder cleared!
BringBackCransberg
9 Jun 2009, 19:16
I've never felt so happy about something that was such a given.
Jamar and the other bloke will be bitterly disappointed.
Duckworth
9 Jun 2009, 19:16
Common Sense Prevails :thumbsu:
Wasn't too worried to be honest.
The tribunal tends to make the right call, even if the MRP system stuffs up.
link:
http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/78526/default.aspx
Thank god.. I couldn't imagine Lucas, Hooker or Bock taking the ruck duties. Three thumbs up.
Wahooti Fandango
9 Jun 2009, 19:19
Great news. :thumbsu:
DapperDon
9 Jun 2009, 19:20
Was always going to happen, softest report in the history of reports in all the world, universe and milkyways combined.
The Dustbin
9 Jun 2009, 19:22
Excellent news. :thumbsu:
james_omahoney
9 Jun 2009, 19:24
The MRP should get carryover points for this blunder. No accountability from those clowns.
Strike Swiftly
9 Jun 2009, 19:27
Thank f* for that
Jonesy1987
9 Jun 2009, 19:52
Was fairly confident he would get off, have a feeling he is going to have a massive game against Melbourne.
Bomber32
9 Jun 2009, 20:05
Great news. I was always supremely confident he would get off.:thumbsu:
Thank f* for that
stole the words straight out of my mouth
hateitorlovett13
9 Jun 2009, 20:21
My massive **** YOU to the AFL still stands. Had to worry me didn't you, ********s.
Knight Ryders
9 Jun 2009, 20:24
Common Sense Prevails :thumbsu:
My thoughts exactly. A win for one for the game as well!!
AndyLesPaul
9 Jun 2009, 20:49
I wonder how long it took.
5 seconds or 10 seconds
bipolarbeaR
9 Jun 2009, 20:51
I wonder how long it took.
5 seconds or 10 seconds
Combination of both imo.
Seriously, shouldn't have even had to dispute it in the first place, pathetic reporting.
AndyLesPaul
9 Jun 2009, 21:32
Combination of both imo.
Seriously, shouldn't have even had to dispute it in the first place, pathetic reporting.
Yeah, absolutely.
Barry Hall punched some guy in the face, and he gets what? (6 or 8 weeks?)
So essentially Barry Halls punch was only 3-4 times worse than Ryders bump.
I wonder how long it took.
5 seconds or 10 seconds
apparently it was quite a while
not sure why. idiots on the MRP
AndyLesPaul
9 Jun 2009, 21:43
But Michael Tovey, QC, said Ryder had kept his feet planted on the ground when shepherding Dangerfield and there was “nothing remarkable” about the force which was used.
Haha.
I think they're boldly implying that Patty Dangerfield is weak;)
The Great Barry Besanko
9 Jun 2009, 22:31
They were discussing on AW that the AFL Advocate was arguing that as Ryder was a bigger bloke than Dangerfield he should have used less force!!!
I couldn't quite believe what I heard and neither could Healy and Russell on AW.
How ****ed up is the whole system!!??
Bombertastic
9 Jun 2009, 22:56
This is the best news all year.
AndyLesPaul
9 Jun 2009, 23:40
This is the best news all year.
Which is sad really :(
"Laycock kicks 7 goals
Lloyd Neagle and Lucas kick a combined total of 15 goals
Essendon are 7-4 with no regrets"
Aww. :(
resurrector
10 Jun 2009, 01:10
yes thank f**k common sense actually prevailed here. hint to the MRP, be accountable and use this case as a precedent that a fair, tucked in, foot planted, within 5m, LEGITIMATE and perfectly executed hip n shoulder is actually fair play and part of the game.
rant over /
I was never worried, I think we all knew that he was going to get off on that one.
stay true
10 Jun 2009, 23:19
I was never worried, I think we all knew that he was going to get off on that one.
Definitely. Was never anything in it but huge lulz.