View Full Version : Man Of The World Cup Standings As Of Today.
St-KriS
22 Feb 2003, 07:51
Man of the Tournament standings:
Lance Klusener (SA) 5
Chaminda Vaas (SL) 5
Wasim Akram (Pak) 4
Tim de Leede (Hol) 4
Herschelle Gibbs (SA) 4
Jason Gillespie (Aus) 4
Sanath Jayasuriya (SL) 4
Sachin Tendulkar (Ind) 4
Andre Adams (NZ) 3
James Anderson (Eng) 3
Ian Billcliff (Can) 3
Jan Berry Burger (Nam) 3
Austin Codrington (Can) 3
Stephen Fleming (NZ) 3
Brian Lara (WI) 3
Damien Martyn (Aus) 3
Prabath Nissanka (SL) 3
Thomas Odoyo (Ken) 3
Andrew Symonds (Aus) 3
Craig Wishart (Zim) 3
Come on Dizzy! We dont want that Klusener winning it again.
fabulousphil
22 Feb 2003, 22:52
Originally posted by St-KriS
Tim de Leede (Hol) 4
.
de Leede is now in de leede.
GhostofJimJess
23 Feb 2003, 08:53
Originally posted by fabulousphil
de Leede is now in de leede.
hehehe ... you've been dying to say that, haven't you Phil.
roostersgal4eva
23 Feb 2003, 12:48
Originally posted by St-KriS
Come on Dizzy! We dont want that Klusener winning it again.
we will win the WC again so it wont matter..
id luv to see dizzie win it :D
EagleBlue
23 Feb 2003, 14:49
would rather win the WC2003 than player of the series. Just ask kluszner 1999 :D
A big tip early on in the year. Gillespie for AB medallist 2004. (For christ sake just stay fit Dizzy !!!!!)
ScouseCat
24 Feb 2003, 10:20
Originally posted by fabulousphil
de Leede is now in de leede.
LOL - funny stuff. :D
In all seriousness, Tim de Leede looks like a very talented cricketer... possibly one who could play county cricket in England if he's not already.
Yeh hes played minor county cricket. Only Lefervbre and Bas Zuiderent have played county cricket from holland.
roostersgal4eva
24 Feb 2003, 14:09
Originally posted by EagleBlue
would rather win the WC2003 than player of the series. Just ask kluszner 1999 :D
A big tip early on in the year. Gillespie for AB medallist 2004. (For christ sake just stay fit Dizzy !!!!!)
I reckon he'll win it too - Come On Dizzie!
btw - where did you get the standings from?
How are these ratings calculated? Tendulkar has 4 centuries already (only second player since Mark Waugh to do it in a world cup) and he's 8th on the list. Seems pretty tough.
What about Shoaib Akthar?
With the ball:
10 wickets at an average of 18
With the bat:
average of 72 with a strike rate of 141
Throw in fastest delivery of all time and I'd say he's had one heck of a tournament, they'll be calling him an allrounder next :D
BTW how does Tendulkar have 4 centuries, he has only scored 321 runs! He has only scored 1 century, I think you will find the '4' are referring to alltime WC centuries.
St-KriS
26 Feb 2003, 06:09
Originally posted by roostersgal4eva
btw - where did you get the standings from?
At the offical world cup site
roostersgal4eva
26 Feb 2003, 17:48
Originally posted by Spogs
How are these ratings calculated? Tendulkar has 4 centuries already (only second player since Mark Waugh to do it in a world cup) and he's 8th on the list. Seems pretty tough.
from the offical world cup website:
The Man of the Tournament is based on the cumulative Man of the Match results awarded by the ICC Match Referee.
After every game the ICC Match Referee selects the top three players. As well as being presented with a gold watch worth R12000, the Man of the Match also receives three points towards the Man of the Tournament award.
The second best player on the day receives two points and the third best gets one point.
The ICC will provide further updates on the Man of the Tournament standings as the ICC CWC 2003 progresses.
& ive been looking and there's no link for the man of the tournament - am i blind or something :confused:
kretchy
27 Feb 2003, 14:59
Originally posted by EagleBlue
would rather win the WC2003 than player of the series. Just ask kluszner 1999 :D
A big tip early on in the year. Gillespie for AB medallist 2004. (For christ sake just stay fit Dizzy !!!!!)
Just as long as a few more if his edges are held by Gilchrist and the slips cordon.
St-KriS
27 Feb 2003, 15:33
Originally posted by roostersgal4eva
from the offical world cup website:
& ive been looking and there's no link for the man of the tournament - am i blind or something :confused:
They just seem to pop up and then disappear in the stats section every few days or so.
red+black
27 Feb 2003, 15:40
Originally posted by Zombie
BTW how does Tendulkar have 4 centuries, he has only scored 321 runs! He has only scored 1 century, I think you will find the '4' are referring to alltime WC centuries.
yes, 4 centuries in all World Cup matches he's played. I don't deny that he's a legend, BUT, these are the 4 centuries:
152 v Namibia (2003)
140* v Kenya (1999)
137 v Sri Lanka (1996)
127* v Kenya (1996)
Not exactly quality opposition there, apart from Sri Lanka. Highest other score is a 90 v Australia in 1996.
red+black
27 Feb 2003, 15:42
Originally posted by Spogs
How are these ratings calculated? Tendulkar has 4 centuries already (only second player since Mark Waugh to do it in a world cup) and he's 8th on the list. Seems pretty tough.
you are comparing two different things:
4 centuries - in his career
8th on list - this World Cup only
roostersgal4eva
27 Feb 2003, 16:32
Originally posted by kretchy
Just as long as a few more if his edges are held by Gilchrist and the slips cordon.
warnie was asked why the guys dont hold on to some of his chances& he said that its 'cause dizzie is faster thatn pidgeon thefore the ball flys off the bat faster.
if's that the case then why can they hold brett lee's chances?