View Full Version : Port Adelaide Player Of The Year Thread
dreamkillers
2 Apr 2003, 21:33
The BigFooty Port Player Of The Year Round 1 votes have been tallied.
There were 260 votes overall which is quite a lot (a good thing!!).
The end voting minus the weighting was:
92 - Wanganeen
37 - P Burgoyne
37 - K Cornes
31 - Hardwick
24 - Montgomery
22 - Stevens
13 - Tredrea
11 - Thurstans
7 - Paxman
6 - Pickett
4 - Salopek
3 - Francou
2 - Cassisi
1 - Lade
With the weighting (which meant 100 total votes were given out) the results look:
32 - Wanganeen
13 - P Burgoyne
13 - K Cornes
11 - Hardwick
8 - Montgomery
8 - Stevens
4 - Thurstans
4 - Tredrea
2 - Paxman
2 - Pickett
1 - Salopek
1 - Cassisi
1 - Francou
0 - Lade
lade is on 0.38...rounded down to 0. The decimals are kept so if he scores another 0.38 he'll end up with a rounded up vote.
Just found 2 slight errors here. Gavin Wanganeen scored 87, not 92. All the other scores are correct. And the total no of votes are in fact 285. Which means 285/15=19 people voted. So the new lists are :
minus the weighing:
87 - Wanganeen
37 - P Burgoyne
37 - K Cornes
31 - Hardwick
24 - Montgomery
22 - Stevens
13 - Tredrea
11 - Thurstans
7 - Paxman
6 - Pickett
4 - Salopek
3 - Francou
2 - Cassisi
1 - Lade
with the weighing :
32 - Wanganeen
13 - P Burgoyne
13 - K Cornes
11 - Hardwick
8 - Montgomery
8 - Stevens
4 - Tredrea
4 - Thurstans
2 - Paxman
2 - Pickett
1 - Salopek
1 - Cassisi
1 - Francou
0 - Lade
Not much difference at all. The second list is exactly the same. The only differences are the total votes and Wanganeen's total score.
P0RT P0WER
5 Apr 2003, 23:14
5- Nick Stevens, 37 posessions, had a great last half the only let down was missing a crucial goal with mins to go after we had all the momentum. He plays his best against the Hawks so next it's likely he can go out to a charging lead in th BFPAPPOTTY.
4- Gav Wanganeen, great game again and on target for his best year yet.
3- Chad Cornes, pity he didn't hang onto a few more marks later in the game and finish off a few goals, he was one stand out in a forward line of wasted opportunities tonight
2- Matty Primus, He dominated the first half, the pathetic ruck rule costed him on occassions but he still destroyed the Brisbane rucks, it's the first game i can remeber him being so dominant and us still losing
1- Dean Bogan, stood up in the last half when Matty seemed to be a bit sore, once he starts hanging onto a few more marks he could maybe be a Key forward.
Apologies to S.Burgoyne and Poults.
Junior was sensational at times but needs to finish off more, that miss in the third quarter was costly turning a 1 goal margin into a three goal margin down the other end. Poults commitment tonight was great, and good to see Thurstans showing his presence although a stupid kick by him started a 7 goal Brisbane onslaught. I was happy to see Pickett also laying a tackle instead of a bump, hopefully we get Tredders back soon and our set shot kicking improves.
5 - Stevens - Incredible work rate, probably his best game against the toughest the league can throw up to him.
4 - Wanganeen - Marshall of the defence
3 - Primus - Comprehensively won the ruck to at least give us a chance to win the ball at ground level, one of his better games against the Lions, highlight was swooping on the ball on the wing and spearing a pass to Broges.
2 - Bishop - Gave Brown pretty much nothing all game in the air
1 - Paxman - Gave Bradshaw/Lynch nothing either. Beat Lynch in all the goal square wrestles.
Honourable mentions: Cochrane did well in his time on Voss. Cornes top first quarter however the possessions faded but the effort never does. James for 80 minutes skill and toughness, primed to take Francou's role. Burgoyne explosive around goals.
5 Nick Stevens - he's basically one of those flat escalators you get in airports. Kept sending the ball forward relentlessly.
4 Jared Poulton - heart, and some skill. Great game, and interrupted a lot of plays that would've been important to Brisbane.
3 Chad Cornes - Great first half, poor second half when he had a KPP on him. Chad plays tall, but not that tall.
2 Matthew Primus - Good effort to get the ball out as often as he did.
1 Kane Cornes - An excellent tagging job on a player that always kills us in Black, deserves a vote for my money.
Bishop and Thurstans unlucky to miss out.
5. Nick Stevens
4. Gavin Wanganeen
3. Chad Cornes
2. Matty Primus
1. Jared Poulton
5 - Nick Stevens. Difficult to go past 37 possessions and really stood up after the loss of Josh Francou.
4. - Matty Primus. Huge effort to carry the greater part of the ruckload again.
3. - Gavin Wanganeen. Provided plenty of run out of defence and prevented goals with his sheer determination and last-minute tackles.
2. - S.Burgoyne. At last allowed to show his running skills and long-kicking upfield. A bit of bad kicking for goal took some gloss off.
1. - J.Poulton. Provided the determination that was needed early and kept getting the bal forward.
Chad Cornes could have got some votes after his first quarter effort, and if Tredrea had stayed on and drawn Leppitsch he probably would. But 8 possessions and 3 marks in the last 3 quarters told against him.
5. Nick Stevens
4. Gavin Wanganeen
3. Kane Cornes
2. Jarrod Poulton
1. Mathew Bishop
5 - N.Stevens
4 - S.Burgoyne
3 - C.Cornes
2 - G.Wanganeen
1 - J.Poulton
5 - Stevens
4 - Wanganeen
3 - Poulton
2 - Primus
1- Brogan
brent33brett33
6 Apr 2003, 20:07
5. Nick Stevens
4. Gavin Wanganeen
3. Chad Cornes
2. Dean Brogan
1. Jared Poulton
mistressemma
6 Apr 2003, 20:44
5. Gavin Wanganeen
4. Nick Stevens
3. Chad Cornes
2. Dean Brogan
1. Shaun Burgoyne
5. Nick Stevens
4. Gavin Wanganeen
3. Chad Cornes
2. Stephen Paxman
1. Matthew Bishop
Many others could have received votes compared to last week.
After my "don't think he can make it" comment I was impressed with Stuart Cochrane's tagging of Michael Voss.
dreamkillers
6 Apr 2003, 22:01
5 - Stevens.....after the bagging I gave him last week it was good to see he took notice of what I said......;)
4 - Primus........dominated and controlled the ruck contests......also loved that pick up and weave he did just like a player half his size......
3 - Wanganeen........the Gav of old is back to his best
2 - Cochrane.......can't believed I've picked the 2 players i bagged last week - stopped Voss's influence on the game despite what the media circus said
1 - K Cornes - a great negating job on one of Brisbane's best mid fielder.......
Unlucky to miss out in my votes were Brogan, Paxman, Bishop, Poulton and many others........a great game by the whole team and would have been a win against any other team in the comp despite the injuries........
5 - Stevens
4 - Primus
3 - Paxman
2 - Poulton
1 - S. Burgoyne
rubberman
6 Apr 2003, 23:47
5 - Stevens
4 - Wanganeen
3 - Primus
2 - Paxman
1 - K. Cornes
5. Wanganeen -- near perfection; must be wonderful to play with him in a side.
4. Stevens -- seems to have much more confidence in his teammates this year.
3. C. Cornes -- would easily have been BOG if Tredrea hadn't gone off, freeing up Leppitsch.
2. James -- great that he's in such good form: we're gonna need him.
1. S. Burgoyne -- the lad lifted.
Che had a wonderful first quarter. Also apologies to Poults, Primus (who answered all the rucking questions:)), many others. Apparently K. Cornes was brilliant in shutting down Black, but not much of that was visible over the television.
5 - Stevens
4 - Wanganeen
3 - Poulton
2 - K Cornes
1 - Brogan
Malibu#27
7 Apr 2003, 12:43
5 - Stevens
4 - Wanganeen
3 - Primus
2 - K Cornes
1 - Paxman
Ok here are teh Round 2 results for the BFPAPOTY
There were 255 votes this week.
Raw Votes:
88 - Stevens
62 - Wanganeen
29 - Primus
24 - Chad Cornes
19 - Poulton
12 - Kane Cornes
10 - Brogan
9 - S Burgoyne
9 - Paxman
4 - Bishop
2 - Cochrane
2 - James
Weighted Votes:
33 - Stevens
23 - Wanganeen
11 - Primus
9 - Chad Cornes
7 - Poulton
4 - Brogan
4 - Kane Cornes
3 - S Burgoyne
3 - Paxman
2 - Bishop
1 - Cochrane
1 - James
BFPAPOTY Leaderboard:
53 - Wanganeen
40 - Stevens
17 - K Cornes
13 - P Burgoyne
11 - Hardwick
11 - Primus
9 - C Cornes
8 - Montgomery
7 - Poulton
6 - Paxman
5 - Tredrea
4 - Brogan
4 - Thurstans
3 - S Burgoyne
2 - Bishop
2 - Pickett
1 - Cassisi
1 - Cochrane
1 - James
1 - Salopek
0 - Lade
Big gap at the top with Wanganeen and Stevens pulling away from the rest of the squad early on.
lets hope some of the injuired guys come back and get some points, i would like to see things close!
Tredders#16
7 Apr 2003, 23:39
5 Stevens
4 Wanganeen
3 Brogan
2 K Cornes
1 Poults
My Votes v Brisbane:
5- Gav
4- Stevens
3- Brogan
2- James
1- Cochrane
This sticky should be for the final weekly tallies only, otherwise we will end up with about 500 replies by the end of round 22.
Just thought it would be good for Macca to post his weekly and total tallies all on one sticky thread.
dreamkillers
8 Apr 2003, 23:23
Originally posted by PAfolwr
This sticky should be for the final weekly tallies only, otherwise we will end up with about 500 replies by the end of round 22.
Just thought it would be good for Macca to post his weekly and total tallies all on one sticky thread.
Does it really matter as all you have to do is open up the last page...........
Originally posted by dreamkillers
Does it really matter as all you have to do is open up the last page...........
Only if you want to look back on the rounds. At the moment the votes are here on a sticky, and the final tally is on another thread that isn't.
dreamkillers
8 Apr 2003, 23:42
Originally posted by PAfolwr
Only if you want to look back on the rounds. At the moment the votes are here on a sticky, and the final tally is on another thread that isn't.
Is that better.......the tally should be 7 posts above this - it's in post date/time order........
Originally posted by dreamkillers
Is that better.......the tally should be 7 posts above this - it's in post date/time order........
Is that moderator magic, or did I miss it before? :D
dreamkillers
8 Apr 2003, 23:56
Originally posted by PAfolwr
Is that moderator magic, or did I miss it before? :D
moderator magic......it's amazing what powers the ninja's have........;)
Macca, did you count our votes (tredders & myself) even though they were late?
Macca19
10 Apr 2003, 21:06
Originally posted by Eago77
Macca, did you count our votes (tredders & myself) even though they were late?
Certainly did mate!!
Macca19
14 Apr 2003, 16:12
Round 3 results are in. Remember people that havent voted can still vote (Porthos)
Total votes were 240.
RAW VOTES / NAME / WEIGHTED VOTES:
68 - K Cornes - 28
68 - Stevens - 28
36 - S Burgoyne - 15
30 - James - 13
9 - Wanganeen - 4
8 - Schofield - 3
6 - Guerra - 3
6 - Thurstans - 3
4 - C Cornes - 2
3 - Bishop - 1
2 - Paxman - 1
Top 10:
68 - Stevens
58 - Wanganeen
46 - K Cornes
18 - S Burgoyne
14 - James
13 - P Burgoyne
11 - Hardwick
10 - C Cornes
10 - Primus
8 - Montgomery
Sorry - late votes:
5- K Cornes
4 - Stevens
3 - Wanganeen
2 - Schofield
1 - Thurstans
Power Pride
20 Apr 2003, 18:14
Round 4 vs. Carlton
5. Stevens
4. Wanganeen
3. S. Burgoyne
2. P. Burgoyne
1. C. Cornes
Macca19
22 Apr 2003, 02:00
270 votes this week.
RAW / NAME / WEIGHTED
83 - Stevens - 31
79 - Wanganeen - 29
39 - Montgomery - 14
33 - K Cornes - 12
14 - Brogan - 5
8 - P Burgoyne - 3
6 - S Burgoyne - 2
6 - Hardwick - 2
1 - C Cornes - 0
1 - James - 0
Leaderboard:
100 - Stevens
88 - Wanganeen
56 - K Cornes
23 - Montgomery
20 - S Burgoyne
16 - P Burgoyne
14 - James
13 - Hardwick
10 - Brogan
10 - C Cornes
10 - Primus
Tredders#16
25 Apr 2003, 00:00
Carlton Game Votes:
5 N Stevens
4 G Wanganeen
3 K Cornes
2 D Brogan
1 B Montgomery
Macca19
28 Apr 2003, 15:38
Round 5 votes are now in and updated.
There was a massive 375 votes in this week! Good work!
RAW / NAME / WEIGHTED
96 - C Cornes - 26
69 - Brogan - 18
57 - Wakelin - 15
51 - James - 14
49 - K Cornes - 13
30 - Wanganeen - 8
12 - P Burgoyne - 3
6 - S Burgoyne - 2
4 - Stevens - 1
1 - Carr - 0
Top 10:
101 - Stevens
95 - Wanganeen
70 - K Cornes
36 - C Cornes
29 - Brogan
28 - James
22 - Montgomery
21 - S Burgoyne
19 - P Burgoyne
15 - Wakelin
Tredders#16
8 May 2003, 22:29
Well, Macca, where r the updated round by round tallies? Or r we going to be left in the dark with a couple of "mystery rounds" like in the Budget? :rolleyes:
Originally posted by Tredders#16
Well, Macca, where r the updated round by round tallies? Or r we going to be left in the dark with a couple of "mystery rounds" like in the Budget? :rolleyes:
Reckon Macca's new job is getting to him, plus it's their busiest time of year.
But still c'mon macca pull your finger out!
Macca19
10 May 2003, 13:30
Sorry guys....Mothers Day week was absolute torture. 8am till 9pm basically everyday, 90% of that time being in a ****ing cold coolroom allocating all the stock, so had little time to myself and when i came home i didnt want to do anything that involved usage of my brain (ie. putting numbers into a spreadsheet!).
Actually on Wednesday i started tallying the votes but somewhere i stuffed up and ended up with the wrong vote total so i thought stuff it ill do it at the end of the week. So i did it last night:
255 votes this week
RAW / NAME / WEIGHTED
82 - Wanganeen - 32
64 - P. Burgoyne - 25
32 - Stevens - 13
21 - Tredrea - 8
17 - Bishop - 7
16 - Brogan - 6
14 - S. Burgoyne - 5
7 - Schofield - 3
2 - Hardwick - 1
TOP 10 LEADERBOARD:
128 - Wanganeen
113 - Stevens
70 - K Cornes
44 - P Burgoyne
36 - C Cornes
35 - Brogan
28 - James
27 - S Burgoyne
22 - Montgomery
15 - Wakelin
Originally posted by Macca19
TOP 10 LEADERBOARD:
128 - Wanganeen
113 - Stevens
The others will want to get a move on it or it will be all over.
Macca any chance of posting the full leaderboard? Cheers.
Macca19
10 May 2003, 19:58
Originally posted by Eago77
Macca any chance of posting the full leaderboard? Cheers.
No worries mate:
128 - Wanganeen
113 - Stevens
70 - K Cornes
44 - P Burgoyne
36 - C Cornes
35 - Brogan
28 - James
27 - S Burgoyne
22 - Montgomery
15 - Wakelin
--------------------------
14 - Hardwick
13 - Tredrea
10 - Primus
9 - Bishop
7 - Poulton
7 - Schofield
7 - Thurstans
6 - Paxman
2 - Guerra
2 - Pickett
1 - Cassisi
1 - Cochrane
1 - Francou
1 - Salopek
0 - Lade
PAfolwr
12 May 2003, 22:27
Originally posted by Macca19
Sorry guys....Mothers Day week was absolute torture. 8am till 9pm basically everyday, 90% of that time being in a ****ing cold coolroom allocating all the stock, so had little time to myself and when i came home i didnt want to do anything that involved usage of my brain (ie. putting numbers into a spreadsheet!).
My wife says to pass on her thanks. :)
Tredders#16
13 May 2003, 00:13
Thanks Macca
Macca19
13 May 2003, 23:06
This weeks votes:
270 votes:
RAW / NAME / WEIGHTED
86 - Wanganeen - 32
69 - Stevens - 26
41 - Brogan - 15
22 - Tredrea - 8
22 - Wilson - 8
13 - P Burgoyne - 5
7 - Carr - 3
4 - S Burgoyne - 1
3 - Schofield - 1
2 - C Cornes - 1
1 - Pickett - 0
LEADERBOARD - Top 10
159 - Wanganeen
139 - Stevens
70 - K Cornes
50 - Brogan
49 - P Burgoyne
37 - C Cornes
28 - S Burgoyne
28 - James
22 - Montgomery
21 - Tredrea
Well...yet again, Gav and Nick at the top and now they have both doubled the votes of everyone else. Must say that its basically out of those 2 now.
Brogan went from 6th to 4th...and Tredrea is now in the top 10.
Kid Dynamite!
13 May 2003, 23:40
Well done, Dean! :) He's becoming a bit of a cult hero, isnt he!
Not very impressed with Chad's tally so far. Might have to give him a kick up the arse at training and tell him to start playing a bit better.
Macca19
26 May 2003, 20:39
Sorry i missed last week guys. Busy week at work combined with the second phone line dying for half the week meant i didnt have a chance to tally up the votes till thursday. Then i thought id wait till after this week.
Anyway. Ill just do the leaderboard and put next to the names what votes they got over the past two weeks. When i put +0 next to a name it means the player got less than 0.5 of a vote in the weighted votes.
LEADER BOARD
1. 197 - Wanganeen (+37)
2. 143 - Stevens (+4)
3. 86 - P Burgoyne (+37)
4. 70 - K Cornes
5. 61 - Tredrea (+40)
6. 51 - Brogan (+0)
7. 48 - James (+21)
8. 36 - C Cornes
9. 30 - S Burgoyne (+2)
10. 28 - Wakelin (+13)
------------------------------------------------
27 - Pickett (+25)
22 - Montgomery
14 - Hardwick
14 - Lade (+13)
10 - Primus
9 - Bishop
9 - Schofield (+1)
9 - Wilson (+2)
7 - Poulton
7 - Thurstans
6 - Paxman
5 - CCC (+5)
3 - Carr (+0)
2 - Guerra
1 - Cassisi
1 - Cochrane
1 - Francou
1 - Salopek
Hey Macca, if you get a chance can you post the votes from the North & Essendon games seperately. P.S. i only just added my votes for the Essendon game, hope it isn't too late.
Macca19
26 May 2003, 23:06
Originally posted by Eago77
Hey Macca, if you get a chance can you post the votes from the North & Essendon games seperately. P.S. i only just added my votes for the Essendon game, hope it isn't too late.
Your votes were added. Never too late mate!
Kangaroos votes
Raw / Name / Weighted
82 - Wanganeen - 30
72 - P Burgoyne - 27
35 - Lade - 13
34 - Pickett - 13
18 - Tredrea - 7
13 - CCC - 5
11 - Stevens - 4
5 - S Burgoyne - 2
Essendon game
105 - Tredrea - 33 (the first century in a round!!)
63 - James - 20
39 - Wakelin - 12
38 - Pickett - 12
33 - P Burgoyne - 11
23 - Wanganeen - 7
5 - Wilson - 2
4 - Schofield - 1
1 - Brogan - 0
1 - Carr - 0
1 - CCC - 0
1 - Lade - 0
Cheers.
Hope you've calmed down since Saturday evening, thought you were going to have a heart-attack! I'm just going to venture over and read the port-Eagles review.
Round 10 Votes:
114 - Wanganeen - 33
87 - Paxman - 26
39 - James - 11
26 - Stevens - 8
24 - Wakelin - 7
21 - Che C-Collins - 6
12 - Pickett - 3
8 - Schofield - 2
6 - Kingsley - 2
4 - Tredrea - 1
2 - Thurstans - 1
1 - Carr - 0
1 - Cochrane - 0
GavinBoard (Top 15):
230 - Wanganeen
150 - Stevens
87 - P Burgoyne
70 - K Cornes
62 - Tredrea
59 - James
51 - Brogan
36 - C Cornes
35 - Wakelin
32 - Paxman
31 - Pickett
30 - S Burgoyne
22 - Montgomery
14 - Hardwick
14 - Lade
Macca19
11 Jun 2003, 20:24
ROUND 11 Votes:
85 - Tredrea - 33
53 - Stevens - 21
38 - Schofield - 15
30 - Wanganeen - 12
27 - Cochrane - 11
11 - Wilson - 4
5 - Burgoyne - 2
5 - Wakelin - 2
1 - James - 0
LEADERBOARD
242 - Wanganeen
171 - Stevens
95 - Tredrea
88 - P Burgoyne
70 - K Cornes
59 - James
51 - Brogan
37 - Wakelin
36 - C Cornes
32 - Paxman
Interesting anomoly in our votes that at the end of round 10 S Burgoyne is leading Broges in the rookie votes yet Broges is infront in the BFPOTY.
Is Junior good at being young?
Originally posted by sog35
Interesting anomoly in our votes that at the end of round 10 S Burgoyne is leading Broges in the rookie votes yet Broges is infront in the BFPOTY.
Is Junior good at being young?
Brogan has re-taken the lead. But when you expect all eligible players to get a vote no matter how crap they play, it tends to be difficult for anyone who is in the team week in, week out to set up a lead. After all, Toby Thurstans would probably be leading if he was a regular in the team himself.
And with the occasional 2,1 votes it's possible for a player to be miles better than another and only get a few more votes than him. Maybe next year the rookie votes should be on the system that the News had in the 80s. You could vote any of 5,4,3,2,1 and you didn't need to vote if you thought a rookie didn't deserve a vote.
Originally posted by mic59
Brogan has re-taken the lead. But when you expect all eligible players to get a vote no matter how crap they play, it tends to be difficult for anyone who is in the team week in, week out to set up a lead. After all, Toby Thurstans would probably be leading if he was a regular in the team himself.
And with the occasional 2,1 votes it's possible for a player to be miles better than another and only get a few more votes than him. Maybe next year the rookie votes should be on the system that the News had in the 80s. You could vote any of 5,4,3,2,1 and you didn't need to vote if you thought a rookie didn't deserve a vote.
Yes we obviously have a flawed system at the moment. Maybe next year we each give each rookie a mark out of ten and then add them up and weight them so that every week each rookie gets a mark out of 100.
PAfolwr
13 Jun 2003, 01:13
Originally posted by sog35
Interesting anomoly in our votes that at the end of round 10 S Burgoyne is leading Broges in the rookie votes yet Broges is infront in the BFPOTY.
Is Junior good at being young?
It shows that when Brogan is good, he can be very good for the team.