PDA

View Full Version : Essendon Under 25s - Oh my!


lamaros
29 May 2010, 16:44
Saw a Collingwood fan post an under 23s side for their team in regards to a dick measuring contest about the quality of young players at their side and I though, hmm, that's not that impressive, we have more young guys playing as key players than they do. I thought I'd demonstrate how young our side is in terms of keys players at the moment.

I decided to use 25 as a cut off point because I think most sides turn over a great amount of their list every 5-7 years, and wanted to show just how many players we currently have who loook like they could still be playing in that time. I think is shows that we have a pretty solid group allready and a good future coming up.

If we didn't draft or trade any new players, this could be our team in 3 years time:

B: H. Slattery Hooker Houli
HB: Dyson Pears Hocking
C: Dempsey Watson Jetta
HF: Monfries Gumby Zaka
F: Colyer Hurley Reimers
R: Ryder Stanton Myers

INT: Bellchambers Prismall Melksham Howlett

EMG: Daniher Lonergan Carlisle Hardingham Long Neagle T. Slattery Still

(the players in bold were 23 or under (and the italics 24) at the start of the year)

What improvements are needed to be made to that side to make us a premiership team?

Only Hille and Fletcher from our current side can be consider key players that will need to be replaced any time soon. McVeigh won't be here forever, but recent arguments on this board have shown that his position in the back pocket isn't going to be that undermanned without him. Welsh is in a similar position, with the gap between his good games and his bad ones meaning that his absence from the side in the past 4 weeks hasn't been missed all that much. Williams can't get into the side at the moment, so it's more a case of if he will ever become important to us, not when will he cease being so. Davey will be something of a loss, but there is Colyer in the wings. It's Winders and NLM that our midfield will probably miss the most, but given the pressure that is being put on for midfield spots now that Myers and Melksham are showing something, and given Winder's erratic start to this season, this is also an area that I think we shouldn't worry too much about.

On Hille and Fletcher though, where are the solutions?

Hille has shown this year that when he is up we are a better side, but how much longer can he go on? Will Laycock or Bellchambers be fit and effective enough to move into the team when Hille eventually leaves, or will Ryder have to pick up the slack himself? How many years do people think Hille has left in him anyhow? I would hope another 3-4 at least, given how fit he looks recently, but you never know when the end might come.

Fletcher isn't as much of a worry, with Pears and Hooker showing defensive ability down back, but we will need to gain another solid defender. I've put Houli in the side above only because he's played in our best 22 a bit and could possibly hold a BP position, but it's not especially likely. Do we have players in T. Slattery and Daniher who can step up in the next year or two?

I know this post is a bit all over the shop, but I guess the general thrust is:

It looks like we have a solid list at the moment for the next 5 years. Where do people think the biggest personnel changes will, or should, occur during that time, and what kind of players should we be looking to bring in to strengthen the team in that case?

Smyth94
29 May 2010, 20:01
Big Bad Bustling Colyer at FF eh?

Frothies Mcveigh
29 May 2010, 20:09
H.Slattery is a rock at FB ;)

lamaros
29 May 2010, 20:20
Big Bad Bustling Colyer at FF eh?

Oh yeah. :D

nickh32
29 May 2010, 23:06
Fletcher should be in there. Hes only 35 on paper but he is really only 20 they faked his birth certificate.

Kong
30 May 2010, 10:46
what is this i dont even

Ben the Gooner
30 May 2010, 11:19
what is this i dont even

d) all of the above

JD11
30 May 2010, 11:34
couldn't the players at least be in position

lamaros
30 May 2010, 12:01
Question:what is this i dont even
a) I was bored
b) Representation of how much our side will change over the next few years, at worst
c) I was quite boredd) all of the above
:o

lamaros
30 May 2010, 12:31
I updated the original post to perhaps be a bit more meaningful and constructive. If I still missed the boat on it I'm sorry. :o

Kind of a pointless exercise I know, but so much of bigfooty is the same... just a bit of fun.

Kong
30 May 2010, 13:47
My post was only due to having Colyer at FF, Dyson CHB, Slattery FB, Zaharakis CHF..

lamaros
30 May 2010, 14:28
My post was only due to having Colyer at FF, Dyson CHB, Slattery FB, Zaharakis CHF..

Oh, no one plays where they're listed these days! :)

Ben the Gooner
30 May 2010, 20:20
Oh, no one plays where they're listed these days! :)

Touche, sir.

Pweter
31 May 2010, 09:21
I actually think this is a great post. Sure, you may have been bored but what it ultimately proves is that we have a genuine premiership window ahead of us, especially when you consider the guys out of that side that should still be playing in 4 years time. And it ignores the fact that we may recruit other players that could become part of our best 22 in their first or 2nd seasons.

Maybe that premiership window is not this season (though I reckon other top 8 sides will now be looking over their shoulder for us on current form), but the future doesn't look too bad at all.