View Full Version : No Clarke, no Marsh...
footychick
12 Jun 2003, 19:35
Just heard on ch. 10 news (don't know how reliable it is) that Clarke is expected not to play against Melbourne. This means Biglands is going to have a big responsibility this week, who do u guys think will be able to play in ruck when he needs a rest???
Originally posted by footychick
Biglands is going to have a big responsibility this week, who do u guys think will be able to play in ruck when he needs a rest??? Perrie or McGregor.
Kane McGoodwin
12 Jun 2003, 19:43
Originally posted by DaveW
Perrie or McGregor. Yeah, I agree with Dave. Even more reason why McGregor probably needs to play as a forward & Hentschel will relieve whoever covers Biglands in the ruck. I expect Biglands will ruck around 85% of the game though.
Stiffy_18
12 Jun 2003, 20:44
Originally posted by Kane McGoodwin
Yeah, I agree with Dave. Even more reason why McGregor probably needs to play as a forward & Hentschel will relieve whoever covers Biglands in the ruck. I expect Biglands will ruck around 85% of the game though. I agree. McGregor will be a back up ruckman and should play up forward when not in the ruck. Hentschel might even play at CHB as he has done well last week for the eagles in that position. He also provided a lot of run. Perrie will have a good one this week at CHF.