holland not to be recontracted at tigerland

[stefoid]

Would pick him up pre-season?

[X_box_X]

Apparently Richardson may be a Bulldog next year. Problem is, he'll be 29 next year. Holland will be 27.

I'd prefer to go after Rawlings.

Although, Richardson or pick 6 and Bowden for Browny wouldn't go astray. ;)

[The Doctor]

Originally posted by stefoid
Would pick him up pre-season?

if he'sthe best player available.

don't particularly want him as part of any Brown deal.

[Dry Rot]

Originally posted by X_box_X
Apparently Richardson may be a Bulldog next year. Problem is, he'll be 29 next year. Holland will be 27.

I'd prefer to go after Rawlings.

Although, Richardson or pick 6 and Bowden for Browny wouldn't go astray. ;)

I'd go after Rawlings first too.

Holland is a hack, better to get Hansen or similar.

I'm sure the prospect of Richo will get a few posts going here....

[K9-54]

Originally posted by stefoid
Would pick him up pre-season?
I believe he's still contracted for 2004. They have told him to prepare for a trade because if he stays at Richmond in 2004, they won't renew. A bit wierd but that's my understand.

So no chance at pre-season.

They clearly want Holland to be part of the Brown deal.

[doggies40]

Ben has been sacked from the tigers, it was just on the news.

[bulldogs1]

So why would we want a player who has been sacked and has a history of injuries? Better to re-draft Allen Jakovich:D