View Full Version : Tigers rate Solomon more than Brown
Streaker
6 Oct 2003, 02:04
Solomon holds key to Brown's move
http://www.realfooty.theage.com.au/articles/2003/10/05/1065292470152.html
Does this mean if Solomon was available Brown wouldn't be going to Tigerland?
In a draft where it is generally accepted that there is a gulf between the top 10 and the rest wouldn't the Bulldogs like to have picks 1, 4 and 6 (Richmond exchange for Brown).
Dane Swan Fan
6 Oct 2003, 02:11
Solomen is more valuable IMO then Nathan Brown. Sure Brown can kick the goals and such but Solomen does the 1%ers and all.
tiger of old
6 Oct 2003, 11:10
if you read the article properly what we are saying is we want an answer from soloman one way or the other so we can sort out deals regarding brown etc.
cheers!
Napier_Street
6 Oct 2003, 12:35
Maybe if Richmond could draft a half decent player for a change rather than raping every other team's list you wouldnt have to be waiting for an answer from Solomon.
I just pray that Richmond's pathetic efforts at impersonating a football club back-fire.
Hope provides as much input as Blumfield did this year if he moves.
mighty tiges
6 Oct 2003, 14:46
Originally posted by dave_27
Hope provides as much input as Blumfield did this year if he moves.
Blumfield was just starting to hit his straps (against St Kilda in round 4) when he tore a groin muscle and missed almost 3 months of footy. Wait until next year to judge him.
Originally posted by mighty tiges
Blumfield was just starting to hit his straps (against St Kilda in round 4) when he tore a groin muscle and missed almost 3 months of footy. Wait until next year to judge him.
Judging him on his last 3 seasons he has been below average.
tiger of old
6 Oct 2003, 15:19
Originally posted by Napier_Street
Maybe if Richmond could draft a half decent player for a change rather than raping every other team's list you wouldnt have to be waiting for an answer from Solomon.
I just pray that Richmond's pathetic efforts at impersonating a football club back-fire. get your facts right! brown and soloman are the only 2 we have chased in along time.
johnson wanted to come home
while blumfield was put on the market by the bombers
Tigerbob
6 Oct 2003, 16:18
Exactly TOO!!
Where did this we are vultures come from, two players in upteenth years we are chasing and we are vultures?? Get real...
Mind you Brown quit the bulldogs, and if he decided Essendon was where he wanted to go you would be defending him, Solomon is the only one we are after and I see no harm in this, he is out of contract, everyone else does it, but when we do it we get ridiculed.......
Its about time we didnt give a stuff and did what we have to do, live with it.
If Solomon wants three years and you arent prepared to offer that to him, and we offer the three years he's after, than tough luck, you had your shot and blew it, if he turns us down, well our bad luck at least we tried......