View Full Version : Trolling Threads
The amount of trolling threads on this board is now getting out of hand. Any new ones starting up will be killed immediately and the culprit banned from this board.
Lighthearted stirring is OK. Blatant, inflammatory trolling isn't.
Hungry29
15 Oct 2003, 13:06
Thank goodness!
It can be really off putting to contribute to (or even just read) some threads as I personally just can't be bothered getting involved in any slanging matches.
Everyday life has enough of those! ;)
Brave move mate.
As we know Essendon are not good at playing by the rules.
One-eyed Tiger
15 Oct 2003, 13:39
You mean it's safe to come back, catch up on news, and not have to wade thru all the BS vitriol posted by halfwit teenage Bomber supporters?
Napier_Street
15 Oct 2003, 13:58
Fair Enough
As long as such sentiments go both ways.
I want to start by asking a serious question
With Solomon out of the picture - who will Richmond actually end up getting - is a deal with Brown close?
And can someone tell me, is Ray Hall any good or was Sheedy being cheeky. Is he worth trading with say a jacobs or Bolton?
Apologies CJH for inciting - but it was fun "for a while" lol.
Will ignore the Bomber trolls for the rest of the day.
TheFoxhat
15 Oct 2003, 14:58
At least now Napier Street can FFFFFFFFFF Fade away...:D
Originally posted by Napier_Street
...
With Solomon out of the picture - who will Richmond actually end up getting - is a deal with Brown close?
And can someone tell me, is Ray Hall any good or was Sheedy being cheeky. Is he worth trading with say a jacobs or Bolton?
Probably! I think the Bulldogs are holding out as much as possible in order to force a better deal. Hopefully they will be too smart for themselves and be forced to have a fire sale at 2:29 tomorrow.
While not doubting that our opeing offer of Hall was an ambit claim, Sheedy was also being a bit cheeky. Hall is nearly 2 metres tall, can run like the wind, play ruck, play in defence, as a 3rd tall forward or even on the wing. In 2003, he was in our best 22 each week until he got injured an missed the last 3rd of the year.
A Hall / Solomon swap would never have happened but maybe Hall + 2nd round pick would have.
Funnily enough, Hall would of a similar standard to either Jacobs or Bolton... maybe a little better because of the ruck factor.
Originally posted by peejay
Brave move mate.
As we know Essendon are not good at playing by the rules.
It goes both ways. It really does. You would be embaressed if you take a look at some of the trolling happening at Bombertalk this week. When the whole Solly thing came out many Richmond supporters rocked up in their droves. In fact, I'm sure you would see it as a slur on the Black n Yellow.
I'm only here as im curious to see some of the feedback and opinions of the Tiger fans on the whole Solly debacle. It's very interesting the see it from the other side of the fence.
The trolling goes both ways unfortunately, Sigh..... but I agree it should not be accepted. There is no need.
http://www.essendonfc.com.au/bombertalk3/
Andrew
Dr Zoidberg
15 Oct 2003, 16:26
On that note can we ban posters such as napier street from this board. It is just really irritating having some 15 year old kid think he knows absolutely evrything there is to know about football.
To be honest, he didn't bother me at first - but this is the RICHMOND board and enough is enough. I'm all for constructive dialogue between opposing supporters but the dribble that this guy writes serves no purpose whatsoever.
Napier street - grow up or P|$$ off.
Thats my 2 cents worth.
rfctigerarmy
15 Oct 2003, 17:03
CJH - doing the Richmond board proud. Well done mate keep up the hard work.
Napier_Street
15 Oct 2003, 17:18
Originally posted by Dr Zoidberg
On that note can we ban posters such as napier street from this board. It is just really irritating having some 15 year old kid think he knows absolutely evrything there is to know about football.
To be honest, he didn't bother me at first - but this is the RICHMOND board and enough is enough. I'm all for constructive dialogue between opposing supporters but the dribble that this guy writes serves no purpose whatsoever.
Napier street - grow up or P|$$ off.
Thats my 2 cents worth.
I posted here with a rumour regarding Ricmond breaching Salary Cap rules and an announcement was pending. The rumour came from Deloittes Touch Tomatsu, the official AFL auditor. I was universally bagged as was Essendon. As I stated later - dont shoot the messenger. But Richmond smugness prevailed and my response was to give you all back a taste of what you were dishing out in liberal servings.
I am happy to discuss any matter football or otherwise with anyone on these boards - including the good Dr Zoidberg. You may even learn something Dr - so I ask you to start the discussion.
How about if we do this - lets come up with the best 22 from Richmond and Essendon over the last 25 years with no more than 11 players from each club being allowed. A kind of peace offering to re-build the bridges of friendship that have for so long been a feature of the two clubs.
In fact, I may even post this discussion point separately as I think it would be an interesting exercise?
Dont you Doctor?
Captain Blood
15 Oct 2003, 17:29
Agree to tone it down, but Nappy stick to your own board and avoid the attacks that will inevvitably come your way
rfctigerarmy
15 Oct 2003, 17:39
Originally posted by Captain Blood
Nappy
CB Your giving that ****** a nickname?
Dr Zoidberg
15 Oct 2003, 18:14
I am happy to discuss any matter football or otherwise with anyone on these boards - including the good Dr Zoidberg.
As long as you agree to play nice that's fine by me :P
mellowyellow
15 Oct 2003, 20:45
These essendon weenie ploppers have certainly been busy.
One-eyed Tiger
16 Oct 2003, 02:58
Yeah I actually had to doublecheck I hadn't mistakenly clicked onto the Bomber board. :rolleyes:
I wouldn't mind so much if they had something interesting to contribute, but they just speak so much bull****. Their mutual masturbation sessions are becoming tiresome but I suppose being young, dumb and full of *** I should make allowances for their disabilities and afflictions. Be great if there was an age limit on here.
Looks like CJH is going to be busy today.....:D
FWIW, bozza has been banned from this board.
Napier_Street was asked to stop the trolling which, pleasingly, he has done and is still free to contribute here.
Captain Blood
17 Oct 2003, 11:22
Originally posted by CJH
FWIW, bozza has been banned from this board.
Napier_Street was asked to stop the trolling which, pleasingly, he has done and is still free to contribute here.
CJH - after what Nappy posted on the Bulldogs board, do we really want him here?
Does thye sun really shine out of Windy Hill, the w@nkEr!
Nappy writes:
" All I can say having already been violated by Richmonds recruiting tactics (as an Essendon supporter) I hope that Richmond falls flat on its face over their trading tactics.
Essendon has always said it would never openly pursue a player from a club going through tough times. Richmond obviously dont share such convictions."
corporal
17 Oct 2003, 12:08
Originally posted by CJH
is still free to contribute here.
I guess the question is what constitutes "contribution"
I'm not happy to admit that I was sucked into the trolling trap, However Napier_Street is so unlogically bias is hard not to say anything when he is posting to everyone's threads with mindless drivel,
Anyway hopefully we will be able to get back to the most important topic... Richmond's oncoming 2004 Premiership!