View Full Version : Phantom Draft
Let's take nominations for the phantom draft that's happening in about three to four weeks time.
My view:
Pick #6: Inside midfielder. Cooney, Sylvia, and Walker will most likely be gone before we get into the draft. But one of them is still available (most likely Walker) then we should take him. Otherwise, our candidates include: Ray, Tenance, McLean, Dunn, Bentick, Surjan.
For our next three picks, I think one of them should be a tall defender. Apart from that, we should just pick the best available. Another possibility, given that we have got two first round picks and a balanced list, is to pick a "project" (perhaps McQualter) in the second round.
So:
Pick #6: Inside midfielder.
Pick #13: Best available/tall defender
Pick #28: Best available/tall defender/"project"
Pick #44: Best available/tall defender/"project"
Pick 6- Tenace or walker...dont rate mclean or dunn
Pick 13- Dyson..im sold on this kid...so much upside and such a talent already.
Pick 28- Tall Defender
Pick 44- Midfielder/Kpp.....take a punt here on a kid that could be anything. Might as well take a risk as we have some serious young talent on the list so we can be patient with a project player.
Windyhillbomber
21 Oct 2003, 11:35
what about raphael clarke, will he still be available come pick 6. not to much has been said about him
Originally posted by Windyhillbomber
what about raphael clarke, will he still be available come pick 6. not to much has been said about him
He will probably still be available. Don't think we need him though. He's very talented, but not the sort of player we should be looking for, I think. If he's still available at pick #13, then we would seriously consider him.
Pick 6: McLean..he appears to be fairly handy.
Pick 13: Watts...has the height already it seems.
Pick 28: Koulouriotis...bring him home and around the Keilor Park mafia at Essendon (Mercuri, Misiti, Peverill)
Pick 44: Lovett-Murray...would be a project player and can play half-back/half-forward.
Originally posted by marcuz
Pick 6- Tenace or walker...dont rate mclean or dunn
Pick 13- Dyson..im sold on this kid...so much upside and such a talent already.
Pick 28- Tall Defender
Pick 44- Midfielder/Kpp.....take a punt here on a kid that could be anything. Might as well take a risk as we have some serious young talent on the list so we can be patient with a project player.
Just about right there I think. Only worry is getting a **** key defender with #28. Hopefully Chris Stewart will be there then.
Well, it seems we're all agreed (so far) that pick #6 is for an inside midfielder. So the next step is to rate the top six in order, so that we can take the best on offer:
This is how I see it:
Cooney
Sylvia
Walker
Tenance
Ray
McLean
Originally posted by Stevo
Well, it seems we're all agreed (so far) that pick #6 is for an inside midfielder. So the next step is to rate the top six in order, so that we can take the best on offer:
This is how I see it:
Cooney
Sylvia
Walker
Tenance
Ray
McLean
Gee I'm starting to take a liking to Tenace, don't know why. Maybe replace McLean with Ryley Dunn
ray is an outside midfielder.
My first preference is Sylvia. He is going to be a superstar but i doubt he will be available in the phantom draft so i think we should take Walker at 6.
For 13 we should go with either Watts or Dyson or if Chaplin is available snap him up but i am pretty confident that the geelong guy will take him (he is a fan).
Pick 28 i would think about taking Rowan Bonson/Jacob Surjan/Jay Nash depending on availability.
Pick 44 Dont really mind but possibly Aaron Davey from Port Melbourne. Very similar to Daniel Wells and is even faster!
Originally posted by Hosko
ray is an outside midfielder.
My first preference is Sylvia. He is going to be a superstar but i doubt he will be available in the phantom draft so i think we should take Walker at 6.
For 13 we should go with either Watts or Dyson or if Chaplin is available snap him up but i am pretty confident that the geelong guy will take him (he is a fan).
Pick 28 i would think about taking Rowan Bonson/Jacob Surjan/Jay Nash depending on availability.
Pick 44 Dont really mind but possibly Aaron Davey from Port Melbourne. Very similar to Daniel Wells and is even faster!
Sylvia and Walker may not be available. You should list your top 6 in order of preference (regardless of whether they will be available or not) so that we can agree on the best choice.
Sylvia
Walker
Tennace
Ray
Chaplin
Forget Cooney he is guarenteed #1
Originally posted by Hosko
Sylvia
Walker
Tennace
Ray
Chaplin
Forget Cooney he is guarenteed #1
Yes, but the point is that he still has to be picked. So I take it that your top 6 in order is:
Cooney
Sylvia
Walker
Tenance
Ray
Chaplin
Suppose those first 5 go to the first 5 picks. Do you still think we should take Chaplin, or should we look for one of the other inside midfielders?
Originally posted by Stevo
Yes, but the point is that he still has to be picked. So I take it that your top 6 in order is:
Cooney
Sylvia
Walker
Tenance
Ray
Chaplin
Suppose those first 5 go to the first 5 picks. Do you still think we should take Chaplin, or should we look for one of the other inside midfielders?
yes take chaplin he is good and even if bradley is there id take chaplin, bradley is a dud.
Originally posted by Hosko
yes take chaplin he is good and even if bradley is there id take chaplin, bradley is a dud.
Bradley looks like another Bolton. I don't think we'll make the same mistake twice.
I dont rate chaplin..reminds me of a young jason Mooney and thats not a good thing
Originally posted by marcuz
I dont rate chaplin..reminds me of a young jason Mooney and thats not a good thing
A very bad thing I think! Does anybody know the positional capabilities of:
Bradley
Chaplin
Watts
Morrison
any other 1st round talls?
Originally posted by bozza
A very bad thing I think! Does anybody know the positional capabilities of:
Bradley
Chaplin
Watts
Morrison
any other 1st round talls?
Chaplin, Watts, and Morrison are all genuine key position players. They are strong in the contests and can take a mark.
Bradley is a 6'6" wingman.
Calder's Ben Clifton is handy, but he'll go second round at the earliest, I think.
Originally posted by Stevo
Chaplin, Watts, and Morrison are all genuine key position players. They are strong in the contests and can take a mark.
Bradley is a 6'6" wingman.
Calder's Ben Clifton is handy, but he'll go second round at the earliest, I think.
Do you know what positions they actually play, or can play? Eg I know Chaplin is a CHB but can he play FF/CHF?
Chaplin can play forward and is a better forward than back..a bit robotic at times.
Watts is a forward..although i havent seen much of him to be honest.
Originally posted by bozza
Do you know what positions they actually play, or can play? Eg I know Chaplin is a CHB but can he play FF/CHF?
Chaplin's position is definitely CHB. He was tried up forward now and then but he didn't seem to be able to get into the game.
Watts should be a good CHF. He does run around all day and his strength at the contests means he's always a good target to kick to.
Originally posted by marcuz
Chaplin can play forward and is a better forward than back..a bit robotic at times.
Watts is a forward..although i havent seen much of him to be honest.
Well there you go. I probably only saw half a dozen games at most where Chaplin played.
Pornstar
22 Oct 2003, 12:10
Originally posted by Stevo
Another possibility, given that we have got two first round picks and a balanced list, is to pick a "project" (perhaps McQualter) in the second round.
I'd be very happy if we got McQualter. I haven't seen him play, but in his 6 games for the Power he averaged 38 disposals, 7 marks and nearly a goal per game. What's the deal with him Stevo? Why does he play so few games?
He has school commitments/football pornstar...Much like jobe watson last year..he only played 6 games for sandy and averaged 43 possesions
Originally posted by marcuz
He has school commitments/football pornstar...Much like jobe watson last year..he only played 6 games for sandy and averaged 43 possesions
Yup. Similar situation with Goddard, who, I believe, was also at Caulfield Grammar. He rarely played school footy, and I don't think the school were happy with that given the scholarship they gave him. I wouldn't be surprised if they spoke to their football team about it and wanted their kids to play predominantly for the school.
Pornstar
22 Oct 2003, 13:14
So why is there so little mention of him in draft talk? 6 games and his worst effort was 31 disposals and 8 marks!
Originally posted by Pornstar
So why is there so little mention of him in draft talk? 6 games and his worst effort was 31 disposals and 8 marks!
Because he is very underdeveloped. He's an unknown quantity. He'll get picked, but not early. Probably not even second round.
bLuEMoOsE
22 Oct 2003, 18:28
I would like to see us take: (not that any1 cares :P)
6# Walker
13# Dyson
28# Koulouriotis
44# Lovett Murry or perhaps a project player anybody know of any underages comething through we could pick up cheaply?
Originally posted by bLuEMoOsE
I would like to see us take: (not that any1 cares :P)
6# Walker
13# Dyson
28# Koulouriotis
44# Lovett Murry or perhaps a project player anybody know of any underages comething through we could pick up cheaply?
i dont think we should use pick 28 on Koula. Sure if he is available at pick 44 he would be worth a shot but consider this, would you trade our 2nd round pick for a 20-sothething-year old who has not made his debut, i know i wouldn't. With pick 28 i would much rather take, one of the following Bonson/Nash/Surjan or even McQualter.
Lovett-Murray we could get with pick 76 or just get him in the rookie draft.
bLuEMoOsE
22 Oct 2003, 18:39
true... but i rate Lovett Murry for some silly reason. What do we know about Danihers son? i heard he was in the draft? he is prolly a hack or some1 would have metioned him im sure
*koulagirl
23 Oct 2003, 00:23
Originally posted by Hosko
i dont think we should use pick 28 on Koula. Sure if he is available at pick 44 he would be worth a shot but consider this, would you trade our 2nd round pick for a 20-sothething-year old who has not made his debut, i know i wouldn't. With pick 28 i would much rather take, one of the following Bonson/Nash/Surjan or even McQualter.
Lovett-Murray we could get with pick 76 or just get him in the rookie draft.
If you're referring to Koula, he's 21 and he debuted in 2000.
id go
6: walker
13: mclean
28: surjan
id go
6: walker
13: mclean
28: surjan
Walker or tenace pick 6
McLean wont be there at 13 i would think...so id pick Dyson
28..surjan definately wont be there...chris stewart might be the go
Pornstar
23 Oct 2003, 13:08
Haven't heard any mention around the boards about the Falcons boys. Are Travers/Kayler-Thompson/Foley worth a look with our later picks?
the good thing is all the teams above us are looking for KPP's
6: walker/tenace i agree
13: i think theres a chance mclean might sneak down/surjan!
28: not sure on this one any ideas?
smokeyyy
23 Oct 2003, 22:21
pick 6 walker or tenace
pick 13 mclean or dyson
pick 28 logan or miller
pick 44 morrison from tassie or clifton calder
pick 76 pass to use in pre season draft as its looking good with rawlings stevens harvey hall jones maybe etc
Cupestar
23 Oct 2003, 22:51
Perhaps we should save the pick to Rookie Chris Goullet...?
Originally posted by Cupestar
Perhaps we should save the pick to Rookie Chris Goullet...?
I think we've got a couple of rookies whose couple of years is up, so they'll probably be moved on. That'll open up a spot for Chris Goullet.
James ezard will get rookied to i would think..sheeds loves that Bloodline sh*t
Think Stevo has touched on this before, but here is the types we should be looking at:
#6 - inside midfielder. One of Tenace, Walker, Sylvia will be around - take them in that order.
#13 - tough one. Maybe a KPP (defender) but if there's nothing there that is worthy of #13, another midfielder is the go. Here we look at Dyson, Surjan, Dunn.
#28 - Project KPP, preferably a defender, and will most likely be a 17 yo. Chris Stewart from Northern perhaps.
#44 - Unknown - maybe somebody who has slipped through, maybe another tall but probably another in and under ball winner.
I think we will keep it at four picks (it all depends how many are delisted).
Cupestar
24 Oct 2003, 00:18
Originally posted by marcuz
James ezard will get rookied to i would think..sheeds loves that Bloodline sh*t
I'd imagine Ezard would go in the main draft. He's done enough for that I'd imagine...
Pornstar
24 Oct 2003, 09:33
Originally posted by marcuz
James ezard will get rookied to i would think..sheeds loves that Bloodline sh*t Joel Reynolds was bloody lucky to get drafted at all, let alone pick 31. He wouldn't have been in the Falcons top 7 players.
Here's my order of preference:
pick 6 - gun midfielder
pick 13 - tall defender
picks 28, 44 - small forwards
We've currently got 16 midfielders on our senior list. After we take another at #6 we need to address our more pressing needs.
Joel Reynolds was bloody lucky to get drafted at all, let alone pick 31. He wouldn't have been in the Falcons top 7 players.
Here's my order of preference:
pick 6 - gun midfielder
pick 13 - tall defender
picks 28, 44 - small forwards
We've currently got 16 midfielders on our senior list. After we take another at #6 we need to address our more pressing needs.
Small forwards is a need thats why i would use 13 on dyson..he can play there with a move to midfield later on. There isn't much quality standout tall defenders...you could probably get a kid later in the draft who could turn out to be as good as the early picks
Pornstar
24 Oct 2003, 10:21
I haven't seen Dyson play. Which AFL player (past or present) does he play like the most?
Think adam ramanuskas....
has better endurance than adam so an on ball role would suit. Thumping kick and very smart around goals...showed great speed and endurance at the draft camp. Mick Turner from the falcons i know rates him very , very highly
Originally posted by Pornstar
Joel Reynolds was bloody lucky to get drafted at all, let alone pick 31. He wouldn't have been in the Falcons top 7 players.
Here's my order of preference:
pick 6 - gun midfielder
pick 13 - tall defender
picks 28, 44 - small forwards
We've currently got 16 midfielders on our senior list. After we take another at #6 we need to address our more pressing needs.
That's all very well Pornstar, but if the tall talent isn't there at #13, you take the best available, simple as that. I'd rather see us take a good midfielder like Dunn, Dyson or Surjan than waste it on a **** tall defender just because he's the only one left. We can then use a later pick for a young 17yo KPP who will take time to develop, who you just wouldn't risk #13 with.
Originally posted by bozza
That's all very well Pornstar, but if the tall talent isn't there at #13, you take the best available, simple as that. I'd rather see us take a good midfielder like Dunn, Dyson or Surjan than waste it on a **** tall defender just because he's the only one left. We can then use a later pick for a young 17yo KPP who will take time to develop, who you just wouldn't risk #13 with.
If one of Chaplin, Gayfer, Stewart is available at #13, I think we should take him.
Pornstar
24 Oct 2003, 15:27
Originally posted by bozza
That's all very well Pornstar, but if the tall talent isn't there at #13, you take the best available, simple as that. I'd rather see us take a good midfielder like Dunn, Dyson or Surjan than waste it on a **** tall defender just because he's the only one left. We can then use a later pick for a young 17yo KPP who will take time to develop, who you just wouldn't risk #13 with. We're going to have pick 13 (or thereabouts) next year, and there will be another Dunn, Dyson or Surjan ripe for the pickings. Two or so years from now Wellman will be gone and Fletcher on his last legs. That leaves Lucas, Henneman, Bolton and Hunt as our tall backs. Henneman is a useless hack, Bolton is up and down and Hunt looks promising but could easily go either way. If we get ouselves a quality tall back NOW, we'll be much better set in defence for 2006.
I know a few supporters here have a hard on for this Dyson bloke, but how many midfielders can we have? We've already got Hird, JJ, MJ, Pev, Rama, Misiti, Bullen, Alvey, Murphy, Rioli, Haynes, Watson, Winderlich, Walsh, Reynolds, Bannister, Davies and whoever we get with pick 6. That is 18 midfielders.
Originally posted by Stevo
If one of Chaplin, Gayfer, Stewart is available at #13, I think we should take him.Yeah, i was thinking Gayfer would be the most likely. 192cm 91kg CHB who also averaged a goal a game. Sounds good to me.
Originally posted by Pornstar
We're going to have pick 13 (or thereabouts) next year, and there will be another Dunn, Dyson or Surjan ripe for the pickings. Two or so years from now Wellman will be gone and Fletcher on his last legs. That leaves Lucas, Henneman, Bolton and Hunt as our tall backs. Henneman is a useless hack, Bolton is up and down and Hunt looks promising but could easily go either way. If we get ouselves a quality tall back NOW, we'll be much better set in defence for 2006.
I know a few supporters here have a hard on for this Dyson bloke, but how many midfielders can we have? We've already got Hird, JJ, MJ, Pev, Rama, Misiti, Bullen, Alvey, Murphy, Rioli, Haynes, Watson, Winderlich, Walsh, Reynolds, Bannister, Davies and whoever we get with pick 6. That is 18 midfielders.
Yeah, i was thinking Gayfer would be the most likely. 192cm 91kg CHB who also averaged a goal a game. Sounds good to me.
I agree with you, but if there's no tall defender who we could justify using pick #13 on, then we should pick the best player available.
But Gayfer will probably still be around at pick #13, so he'd be a good choice. Chaplin will have probably gone by then. Stewart would be another good choice, I think.
I wouldnt waste a first round pick on gayfer, chaplin, watts they will be average players at best. Take a kid with plenty of upside at 28 and 44 in two to three years time they will be ready.
Pornstar
24 Oct 2003, 17:01
Originally posted by marcuz
I wouldnt waste a first round pick on gayfer, chaplin, watts they will be average players at best. Take a kid with plenty of upside at 28 and 44 in two to three years time they will be ready. ie. Aaron Henneman MKII
Pornstar believe me when i say the best tall kids at the moment in this draft are not up to previous years standards....You can get a kid at 44 who with the right devolpment will be just as good as the others who go earlier. Morrison from tassie is one who could go to us at 28 from tassie. Missed the whole year with injury but if he was fit he would have gone first round very easily.
FOOOOOLS!!!!!!
6: midfielder (walker, tenance, clarke maybe)
13: midfielder (dyson - i dont rate him though, mclean, surjan)
28: KPP (no idea)
44: small forward (no idea)
I think Gayfer is worth considering for #13 but to be honest I'm only going on what I've heard about him - haven't seen too much of him, only bits here and there. Chris Stewart - maybe a bit early, I'll be wanting to use #28 on him. Watts sounds like a pretty boy from a private school, his type usually turn out to be soft cocks. I think Gayfer would be the pick of the talls IF we were to use #13 on a KPP. I'd still be inclined to take a Dyson, Surjan etc.
watts goes to my school :/
i would of like pick 6 and 9 (essendon missing out on finals, i know im negative.) but that would pretty much guarantee clarke/walker/tenace + mclean
bLuEMoOsE
25 Oct 2003, 17:45
i cant see watts being there @ 13 and he prolly aint what we need we are really looking for a new backmen because we have Johns coming through for our CHF which may mean Bolton can go Back but he isnt really the sort of person u would rest your defence on so u would say we have to pick up a young promising tall i would say a tallented 17 yr old who we can build with because the draft talls arnt strong as we have been told and the idea of taking Gayfer just because he is the only reasonable tall left appalls me pick 13 should be used on some1 with real tallent i hope at least a few of u agree with me.
Originally posted by smokeyyy
pick 6 walker or tenace
pick 13 mclean or dyson
pick 28 logan or miller
pick 44 morrison from tassie or clifton calder
Yep agree with most of these
If Morrison is available at 28 we should not hesitate, TAKE HIM. He was going to be top 10 before his injury. If we take 2 midfielders with 6 + 13, we wont be needing miller.
Originally posted by bLuEMoOsE
i cant see watts being there @ 13 and he prolly aint what we need we are really looking for a new backmen because we have Johns coming through for our CHF which may mean Bolton can go Back but he isnt really the sort of person u would rest your defence on so u would say we have to pick up a young promising tall i would say a tallented 17 yr old who we can build with because the draft talls arnt strong as we have been told and the idea of taking Gayfer just because he is the only reasonable tall left appalls me pick 13 should be used on some1 with real tallent i hope at least a few of u agree with me.
Agreed, we've got Johns and Laycock coming through as key forwards, we don't need another.
We really only need another quick and creative inside midfielder, and a key defender. The best kids in the draft are all midfielders, so that's what pick #6 should be used for. As for #13, it could go either way. Gayfer is a smart defender, he reads the play well and knows how to cut off the angles. But we could also get a good defender at #28 or #44, and then use pick #13 on the best available player (which would be another midfielder).
Originally posted by Hosko
Yep agree with most of these
If Morrison is available at 28 we should not hesitate, TAKE HIM. He was going to be top 10 before his injury. If we take 2 midfielders with 6 + 13, we wont be needing miller.
From what I've been hearing about Morrison, it sounds very similar to Courtney Johns' case. Big key forward who constantly impresses and is touted as being a high draft pick; breaks down with injury, and loses favour.
Not convinced we really need him, but he sounds like one of the few genuine key position players in this years draft. He'll probably go before #28, but if he's there, he'd be a reasonable selection.
bLuEMoOsE
25 Oct 2003, 18:02
I agree entirley. What are the Chances of Mclean being available at 13, because if can get walker or Tenance with 6 and Mclean with 13 we would be laughing plus say morrison with 28, and a 17 yr old with 44... would be a good draft.. im not sure about Dyson, ive looked him up he seems to be classy, but id say Mclean would be better. As he is prolly the smartest player in the draft, reads it reeeally well.
go bluemoose someone with an idea + hes ready for afl!
Bomber12
26 Oct 2003, 11:13
Originally posted by marcuz
James ezard will get rookied to i would think..sheeds loves that Bloodline sh*t
He cant be rookied this yr!!! have to be 18 yrs of age, and i doubt he will be drafted there a alot of similar players that are ahead of him, might be a club that takes a punt, very very fit, strong for his size and works hard around the ground
A thought:
Suppose that Cooney, Sylvia, Walker, Tenance, and Ray all go in the first five picks. Instead of looking at someone like McLean or Dunn or Dyson, etc. of whom one might still be available at pick #13, perhaps we could take Clarke at pick #6?
bLuEMoOsE
26 Oct 2003, 14:10
we would prolly only have him for 1 year b4 he asked to be traded to the saints....
Originally posted by Stevo
A thought:
Suppose that Cooney, Sylvia, Walker, Tenance, and Ray all go in the first five picks. Instead of looking at someone like McLean or Dunn or Dyson, etc. of whom one might still be available at pick #13, perhaps we could take Clarke at pick #6?
This situation would not be ideal, put it that way. I think Dunn would be our man.
Originally posted by bozza
This situation would not be ideal, put it that way. I think Dunn would be our man.
Agreed, on both counts. I've been saying it for a while now... Dunn is the sort of player that Sheedy likes.
I think we'll be relying on Carlton to take Bradley (or at least, not one of those five midfielders). Bulldogs and Melbourne will both take two midfielders, since they already have plenty of young talls.
Originally posted by Stevo
Agreed, on both counts. I've been saying it for a while now... Dunn is the sort of player that Sheedy likes.
I think we'll be relying on Carlton to take Bradley (or at least, not one of those five midfielders). Bulldogs and Melbourne will both take two midfielders, since they already have plenty of young talls.
I think there is still a chance WB will take a tall with #4, they have a few young talls but not many seem to be showing much. Anothe may be in order. If this happens and Carlton also take a tall, one of Sylvia, Tenace and Walker are ours.
Originally posted by bozza
I think there is still a chance WB will take a tall with #4, they have a few young talls but not many seem to be showing much. Anothe may be in order. If this happens and Carlton also take a tall, one of Sylvia, Tenace and Walker are ours.
That's a big "if" though... ;)
Sheeds may surprise us all and pick some smokey playing for Keilor park U/18's..or some school kid nobody has heard of....the old boy always seems to do something outa the ordinary for our first round picks.
I'd be happy with Tenace/Walker for our first pick.
Dyson/Morrison with our second. I dont rate Dunn, much like weaver has stated most people think he is better than he really is. Mundy , Gayfer , Chaplin will be good players at best. Billy Morrison has the size on his side that if we were going to choose a KPP id chose him over the rest.
i have changed my choice, id take mclean at 6
Originally posted by jivey
i have changed my choice, id take mclean at 6
Only if Walker, Tenance, Sylvia, and possibly Ray, were unavailable.
Originally posted by marcuz
Sheeds may surprise us all and pick some smokey playing for Keilor park U/18's..or some school kid nobody has heard of....the old boy always seems to do something outa the ordinary for our first round picks.
I'd be happy with Tenace/Walker for our first pick.
Dyson/Morrison with our second. I dont rate Dunn, much like weaver has stated most people think he is better than he really is. Mundy , Gayfer , Chaplin will be good players at best. Billy Morrison has the size on his side that if we were going to choose a KPP id chose him over the rest.
I agree Morrison would be a good choice.
BluesPrez
27 Oct 2003, 18:35
Carlton will be taking Walker with pick 2, so I'm sorry guys. I think Tenace will not get to pick 6 either, I have a suspicion that Melbourne will take him, even though their KPP are crap. Their midfield ain't crash hot either.
Got this weeks lotto numbers while your at it
bLuEMoOsE
27 Oct 2003, 19:39
Heh.
Cooney Walker Sylvia Bradley Chaplin/Watts Tenance
Imo i of course am i likley to be wrong.
Falconer02
28 Oct 2003, 22:59
I think pick 13 you guys should opt for Dyson.Surjan/Mclean/Peel/Mcqualter
Originally posted by Falconer02
I think pick 13 you guys should opt for Dyson.Surjan/Mclean/Peel/Mcqualter
McQualter WILL still be available at our pick 28 and maybe even 44!
Originally posted by Hosko
McQualter WILL still be available at our pick 28 and maybe even 44!
Yup. McQualter is too big a risk at #13.
Inside midfielder at #6; A good tall defender (if there is one) at #13, otherwise another midfielder.
Originally posted by Stevo
Only if Walker, Tenance, Sylvia, and possibly Ray, were unavailable.
which is highly liekly except ray