PDA

View Full Version : well every1 has had a go"my phantom draft"


murphy2bedabest
19 Nov 2003, 16:49
-first im a dog fan
- * intcates father/son
-u all should know the draft order/atleast your teams picks
-this year isn't deep/clear ask all clubs to do a phantom draft and u'll get 16 different ones



1adam cooney
2andrew walker
3colin sylivia
4farren ray
5 kane tenace
6 raphael clarke
7kepler bradley
8 brock mclean
9furgus watts
10matt moody
11micael pittigrew
12ryley dunn
13 troy chaplin
14jay nash
15ricky dyson
16brent hall
17david mundy
18beau water
19llane spanndman
20bill morrison
21david trotter
22michael johnson
23breet stanton
24will gayer
25alix gilmore
26jacob surjan
27callum burges
28 harry miller
29julian rowe
30tom logan
31sam butler
32braden shaw*
33paul duffield
34 zac dawson
35chris stewart
36 chris johnson*
37tom roach*
38 mark blake*
39 jake furfaro
40 andrew erickson
41 brad symes
42 ben clifton
43 breet peack
44 jed adcock
45 aaron davey
46 tim schmidt
47 shannon motlop
48 heath shaw*
49 paul richardson
50luke herrington
51shane tuck
52 matt spencer
53 josh willoughby
54andrew merrington
55 ben marsh
56pass
57shane morrison
58jason whitehead
59pass
60pass
61pass
62 murry boyd
63 steven lawrence
64 linden fridricks
65pass
66pass
67 jordan banisster
68pass
69 steven paxman
70 andrew crowell
71craig callaghan
72james davis
73brad symore
74kane taylor
75 pass
76pass
77pass
78pass
79pass
80pass
81pass
82pass
83pass

tashibatts
19 Nov 2003, 16:57
Disagree with the Roos picks,

Watts, Gayfer & Ericksen.

All are tall. I don't think so. Think the Crows will go after Ericksen anyway.


Go Roos

murphy2bedabest
19 Nov 2003, 17:01
Originally posted by tashibatts
Disagree with the Roos picks,

Watts, Gayfer & Ericksen.

All are tall. I don't think so. Think the Crows will go after Ericksen anyway.


Go Roos
a an ageing list i'll give u erickson but watts and gayfer CHF AND CHB in a few years time??? who'd u pick at those picks

tashibatts
19 Nov 2003, 19:15
*Cough* CHF? Ahh, no. That position belongs to Drew Petrie.

And I would hardly call the Roos list aging. 6th youngest in the comp in 03.

Pick 9, Ryley Dunn.

Pick 24.. I wouldn't have a clue.

Go Roos

holdencaulfield
19 Nov 2003, 20:33
Don,t know why every phantom draft has Geelong taking multple tall players . i doubt this will happen . We already have 198cm Blake so i don't see the reason to take 198cm Bradley.

no1bankteller
19 Nov 2003, 21:05
Pettigrew at 11...do not think so...more likely a rookie list...or somebody else can have him...

If you substituted Callum instead I think you could be on to something though...would love to get Surjan at 26 though do not like our chances...

macca23
19 Nov 2003, 22:22
Originally posted by murphy2bedabest


14jay nash

31sam butler

58jason whitehead

67 jordan banisster



These would have to be the most amazing quartet of phantom draft selections for Adelaide that I've seen so far. I'm no expert, but I just can't agree with your first two picks, and Adelaide have already stated that they are most unlikely to use their 4th pick.

I'd be very down in the dumps after the draft if you proved to be Nostrodamus!! :(

liz
20 Nov 2003, 03:04
Originally posted by macca23
These would have to be the most amazing quartet of phantom draft selections for Adelaide that I've seen so far. (

Don't worry - the Sydney ones are just as bewildering

16 Brent Hall (developing ruckman not a priority with LRT and Meiklejohn on the list)

29 Julian Rowe - know nothing about him so can't comment

45 Aaron Davey - very much doubt it

47 Shannon Motlop - doubt it even more

63 Steve Lawrence :rolleyes:

Seb
20 Nov 2003, 06:26
I could live with Geelong picking Bradley.

King Corey
20 Nov 2003, 09:10
Re ROOS:

Happy with Watts and Gayfer with first 2 picks although I've gone off Watts a little in terms of queries on his speed and disposal. But in principle a CHF and CHB are fine. Using 1996 as an example where McKernan and Carey were both All-Oz CHF nominations, North still drafted Hewitt, Kent Kingsley and Cam Mooney that year to stock up on potential key possie types.

You can't go wrong drafting quality key position players. Can't see us taking Eriksen (Hale/Petrie/McIntosh) but Gayfer would be value at 24.

But gee you must rate North's recruiters highly - they're that cocky they pass at 56 then take Essendon refuse in James Davies at 72! Obviously they (correctly) rate him below a passed selection?!

Fall Out Boy
20 Nov 2003, 09:24
Originally posted by murphy2bedabest
54andrew merrington


Why on earth would Geelong want a Carlton reject?

GOALden Hawk
20 Nov 2003, 09:57
Originally posted by phatandphreaky
Why on earth would Geelong want a Carlton reject?

After the glittering success of Adam Chatfield it would seem a given to me.

murphy2bedabest
20 Nov 2003, 16:50
Originally posted by liz


63 Steve Lawrence :rolleyes:
that pick is carlton and the should pick him up

i went on the basses that cart would pick up used players, pagen has done it b4 and there 2nd picks at 57

with the saints and ben marsh at 55 they need a ruckman and have a young list, but need to make finals


and as for watts at chf that won't be for 3 years i'd say u have to look past now!

and bradley would be handy at the cats he should play 10-15 games as a 3rd tall up forward could kick a few for them