International Law: The law you use when you need it to look good, yet conveniently ignore when it doesn't suit your purposes.
Bit like international community, you and your allies.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
International Law: The law you use when you need it to look good, yet conveniently ignore when it doesn't suit your purposes.
Fair point and thanks for bringing the Syria situation back to my attention.Why is there a bigger focus on this when you have an even worse situation unfolding in Syria? More people dead in the last 72 hours than the last how many weeks of this conflict?
Why is there a bigger focus on this when you have an even worse situation unfolding in Syria? More people dead in the last 72 hours than the last how many weeks of this conflict?
Because the people driving the narrative want to maintain the position that one side here is "the good guys" and the other "the baddies"?
The situation in Syria is not so easily elucidated.
Because the people driving the narrative want to maintain the position that one side here is "the good guys" and the other "the baddies"?
The situation in Syria is not so easily elucidated.
Hamas = terrorists = destruction of Jews = baddies
Are you ******* serious? By roof knocking? which has a high causality rate anywayOne side tries to minimise casualties (by warning the civilians in the area they're striking at).
No they're not 'only firing at Hamas targets':
You dont get it mate; Israel dont want to 'hit Hamas'. They want Palestinian Arabs gone.
All of them.
How many refugees and displaced persons are there mate? Millions at last count.
And Israel just keeps getting bigger.
You can keep blaming the Palestinians for that if you want, but I call bullshit.
Neither are the Palestinains. Seriously mate; put yourself in their shoes.
You seem to be able to justify thousands of strikes and hundreds dead in response to three civilian casualties.
How many air strikes and suicide bombers is Palestine 'justified' to fire back in response to compensate it for the 500 plus they've copped?
Mate, I'm angry about wars of agression all over the world. Im not isolating my anger towards Israel out of any particular anti semitism or the like.
It just shits me that so many people stand up for a nation that seems hell bent on ethnic cleansing.
Name one other country that gets as much support for ethnic cleansing as Israel?
Lol what? Jews in Israel are conscripted to join the Army, drive Merkova tanks and helicopter gunships.
What is the meaningful difference here?
Why do you think Hamas are firing rockets at Israel?
How on earth can you justify rockets killing people - but only when they are travelling in one direction?
Should have massacred those villages the Jewish way:
Just roll in with Merkova tanks and bulldozers, knock the houses down and build 'Jewish' settlements straight on top of the ruins.
Look closely at the above map, and tell me again who is 'under attack'.
Tip: It only works if you're honest with yourself.
This is the definition of a generalisation. Just because you say it, does not make it true buddy. That's like me saying, all Arabs and all French are anti-semites and want every Jew dead. You do not need to stoop to these low levels.
They (hamas) do this because they want to harm, murder and destroy Israel and their citizens over building their own nation.
What is wrong with you? you don't read my posts in full do you? I said you are free to critisize Israel for civilian casualties. And I said they are not striking gaza in response to the 3 teenagers. They are doing it to stop the 1000s of rockets aimed at the heads of every Israeli citizen and their dog.
Israel are not ethnically cleansing anyone and I resent this. This current conflict is about stopping rockets hitting their civilians, not about killing everyone Palestinian they can find.
If the Taliban were hiding in the outer subburbs shooting rockets at the CBD, using underground tunnels to kidnap Melbournians on the way to work - would you let this happen?
Your obsession with 'Jewish' is fascinating. Do you know that there are significant Arab-Israeli, christians, Druze popoulations in Israel? They also serve in the military you know. But oh it must be the Jewish ones that are bad.
Regarding your map - you left out the bit that Israel gave back the land they had to Egypt - for peace, and still occupy parts of the West Bank because they were invaded by Jordan, twice! Countries dont just return land after getting invaded. Oh actually wait a tick, Israel does.
If Israel lowered their weapons, they would be open to attack. That is the key point in this. .
Are you ******* serious? By roof knocking? which has a high causality rate anyway
I'm a Palestinian mother. I have 4 kids aged 2, 4, 5 and 9.
My roof gets 'tapped' and I have 30 seconds to get my 2 year old up from its nap, my 4 year old out of the bath, my 5 year old and 9 year old out of the street, to my side to help carry the other 2 kids 500 meters to safety before they blow the s**t out of my house and neighbouring houses. Sounds reasonable....
"We" will reap what "we" sow for decades to come.
No it doesn't make it ok. My heart goes out to the families of those kids. It's a shocking tragedy that should never have taken place. It is however a war and there will be civilian casualties. I hope so much that there will be no more and so do the Israeli's.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...tinian-children-killed-by-Israeli-forces.htmlCant recall anything like this in UK newspaper, particularly a right wing one.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...tinian-children-killed-by-Israeli-forces.html
Who is we and what is being sown?
So for every militant they kill, Israel are happy to take out about five innocent civilians.Via Glenn Greenwald re current Gaza onslaught:
So for every militant they kill, Israel are happy to take out about five innocent civilians.
but the palestinians should not be occupying and invading israel starting in 1948.Yep.
It's running at roughly 4:1 since 2001.
Sample size rapidly nearing 10,000 as we speak.