Luke Bruest Vs Chad Wingard

Luke Bruest or Chad Wingard

  • Luke Bruest

    Votes: 143 43.7%
  • Chad Wingard

    Votes: 184 56.3%

  • Total voters
    327

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Once again he struggled when the game was there to be won, he was non existent.

Yeah, appearing when the game is there to be won is probably what Wingard is known best for. He's had a down month, and still averaging decent numbers.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Been playing up the ground half the game and when he isn't there is literally ONLY schulz as opposed to Roughhead, Hale, Gunstan etc at Hawks who all make Bruests job a lot easier than Wingards this year.
Righto so Westhoff is invisible also.
Rough and Gunston both push up the ground or do you only watch Port?
 
Silly thread...Hawks supporters would argue Mitch Thorpe is better than Wayne Carey.
Port supporters would argue that Scott Hodges was better than Dunstall.

s**t this is an easy game you are playing young fella.

Who is Mitch Thorpe, no player by that name has ever been on the Hawks list.
 
Righto so Westhoff is invisible also.
Rough and Gunston both push up the ground or do you only watch Port?

Rough and Gunston would spend a lot more time inside 50 than westhoff and schulz, get champion data account if you want to verify PLUS you have Hale if not the case which is exactly what would help Wingard, just any tall.
 
Still Breust.
 
Been playing up the ground half the game and when he isn't there is literally ONLY schulz as opposed to Roughhead, Hale, Gunstan etc at Hawks who all make Bruests job a lot easier than Wingards this year.
Marks inside 50 is Hale, Rough & Gunston 87 and Schulz & Westhoff 87!
So it really doesn't help your argument as Wingard should just be at 2 players feet where Breust has to be at 3.
 
Back
Top