I'd consider it. With pick three your a good chance of finding another high quality player.
List Mgmt. AFC - 2014 Drafting and Trading
- Thread starter PKnox
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
Because people on here criticise our big defenders for their lack of attack/run, which michael provides. Otten is good enough defensively (last week aside) to play second tall to cover michael while he develops a little.
All this talk of trading Danger?
Why would you trade him ever? For fear of losing him? That is just plain nuts.
There is no other player like him in the comp - and if you want to upset just about every young crows supporter we have, then go ahead.
He is gold on and off the field.
Forget it. Never.
I'd love to lure Cameron, but not for Danger - not for Sloane - not for Crouch - not for Talia. If we become one of those clubs that trades away it's heart and soul then pity for us all.
<EDIT> OR TEX!!! </EDIT>
Why would you trade him ever? For fear of losing him? That is just plain nuts.
There is no other player like him in the comp - and if you want to upset just about every young crows supporter we have, then go ahead.
He is gold on and off the field.
Forget it. Never.
I'd love to lure Cameron, but not for Danger - not for Sloane - not for Crouch - not for Talia. If we become one of those clubs that trades away it's heart and soul then pity for us all.
<EDIT> OR TEX!!! </EDIT>
Last edited by a moderator:
- Oct 16, 2011
- 15,341
- 38,090
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
It is around the mark we'd have to go. Question would be what type of offer could GWS put in front of Danger to make that happen...I'd imagine the AFL would help out financially to make it worthwhile, something around the mark of 8 million for five years
- Jun 18, 2013
- 505
- 540
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
The only thing supporters want is a premiership, if nobes thinks trading danger is best for the club in its pursuit of a premiership then I say go for it, by the way I would take danger + pick 10 for Cameron and pick 3 in a heart beat.
spot on you dont trade away the fabric, heart and soul of the club
thank god many posters on here dont make list management decsions
At the very least it may be a chance to put Danger to the sword this trade period - his extension needs to be done or traded out IMO. Otherwise the whole FA BS is going to pollute our 2015 and if he goes we get a draft pick and that's it.
Clubs need to take back a bit of power, especially at the top end
IMO you do if said fabric and soul actually won't commit with FA on the horizon.
IMO you do if said fabric, heart and soul actually won't commit with FA on the horizon.
- Jun 18, 2013
- 505
- 540
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Agree 100 %, people are going to say trading danger early out of fear of him leaving is ridiculous but receiving pick 14 or 15 next year is what's ridiculous especially if we could potentially get the next Wayne Carey instead.
- Jun 18, 2013
- 505
- 540
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Agree 100 %, people are going to say trading danger early out of fear of him leaving is ridiculous but receiving pick 14 or 15 next year is what's ridiculous especially if we could potentially get the next Wayne Carey instead.
- Oct 16, 2011
- 15,341
- 38,090
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Mark Robinson believes Essendons supplement program was above board. Guy is a dead set * wit
- Oct 16, 2011
- 15,341
- 38,090
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
A trade could only happen if he asked to go, so the hypothetical trades would be based on a hypothetical Danger, suggesting he wanted Scullys money
or tex
give your self an uppercut
Kane McGoodwin
Make me an Admin!
- May 21, 2001
- 81,247
- 81,546
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Crows
I'm happier than he re-signed
Kane McGoodwin
Make me an Admin!
- May 21, 2001
- 81,247
- 81,546
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Crows
Where is the dislike post button...
1. Danger would have no interest going to GWS - none, nix.
2. Danger has made it clear he want success. IMO he will stay as that type of guy (no Tippett or Gunston), but if he were to move it would be home to Geelong.
3. Danger still has 1.5 years of his contract left, yet the paranoia panic on this board wanting him to sign now. IMO, he will re-sign with us long-term within the next 6 months - there is no rush as he is not in the last year of his contract.
You just don't trade players like Dangerfield who are a key fabric of the club as it causes massive collateral damage.
Kane McGoodwin
Make me an Admin!
- May 21, 2001
- 81,247
- 81,546
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Crows
WTF is up with you tonight?
Sure I want Cameron too, but 1st you want to trade Danger, next Tex.
Danger, Sloane, B Crouch, Tex & Talia - all untouchable - not only for their abilities, but they are AFC & to lose them trashes the fabric of the club!
If (doubtful) Cameron want to come to the Crows, then it is anyone else + 1st rounder + other (exchanged) picks if need be.
If Cameron wants to come here the only way we would get it done is if he actually says he only wants to go to the Crows, and thats up to us to make happen. Players have been getting to their club of choice for years from Judd to Polec when their club could of got better offers if the player was happy to go anywhere. If he chooses us we will get a good deal.
Where is the dislike post button...
1. Danger would have no interest going to GWS - none, nix.
2. Danger has made it clear he want success. IMO he will stay as that type of guy (no Tippett or Gunston), but if he were to move it would be home to Geelong.
3. Danger still has 1.5 years of his contract left, yet the paranoia panic on this board wanting him to sign now. IMO, he will re-sign with us long-term within the next 6 months - there is no rush as he is not in the last year of his contract.
You just don't trade players like Dangerfield who are a key fabric of the club as it causes massive collateral damage.
I don't quite see how these two haven't moved to more successful clubs? I don't think Danger is looking to go anywhere either - but your logic got lost on me there somewhere
Yeah thats the kind of currency you'd be looking at I reckon
Kane McGoodwin
Make me an Admin!
- May 21, 2001
- 81,247
- 81,546
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Crows
Yes, I better clarify this. Danger is the type of character who wouldn't move club unless he didn't think his club had much future of winning a flag. The other 2 didn't need much convincing to move!I don't quite see how these two haven't moved to more successful clubs? I don't think Danger is looking to go anywhere either - but your logic got lost on me there somewhere
- Status
Similar threads
