Floor Pie
Cancelled
- May 13, 2014
- 2,580
- 2,404
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
To save time, can you point out what part of the video provides facts that a ball created the damage?
Because 1.3 mins in... I'm sick of the voice.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What exactly do you mean POGMA? Do you mean a "breakthrough" is your code for posters agreeing with your conspiracy theories, and that "showing your true colours" is code for posters developing their own opinions? Is that what you mean?Only a few days ago you were pretending to be close to a breakthru, and yet here you are showing your true colours.
SB, you posted this a day ago and I'm still not sure what it meansBecause understanding the true powers behind 911 means understanding the true powers behind all world geopolitics.
It is a realisation one must come to oneself through patient, reflective study and observation.
There is good reason why certain philosophical teachings emphasize gradual progress through stages of understanding.
Utterly nothing would be gained if I were to tell you who were responsible for 911.
Your postings in this thread reveal that you are missing the fundamental groundwork necessary to appreciate the bigger picture.
Not that this is your fault. You have been misled at every turn since the moment you were born.
The only person in this thread I see trying to stifle discussion is yourself. This is a discussion forum for both sides of a discussion. If you're not going to put in your own theories other than rubbishing other people then why even bother posting here?It has all been covered.
The more interesting question is why posters like yourself devote so much time to forums like bigfooty attempting to stifle discussion on topics like 911. Your posting history reveals that this is your main reason for even logging in every day.
There is already a msm/gov/edu apparatus to peddle the beliefs you are peddling here. Why do you feel the need to hep them?
It is easy to see why skeptics like myself spend time on these forums, we are attempting to spread alternative viewpoints/philosophies/theories which don't get msm/gov/edu coverage. Like trying to balance the scales which we see tipped too far to one side.
If we are just 'nuts' to people like yourself why bother posting here? What are you trying to accomplish?
Zzzz, you still haven't added anything to any discussion in this thread and you're still spouting your smug nonsense. Maybe you could post another picture of sheep to show what it says about your positions/beliefs? There's no upset/defensive/aggressive nature to my post, you're just being called out on your bullshit. Go away if you have nothing to add.See, look how combatative people like you are. Personal attacks, misrepresenting arguments, on it goes.
When people get upset/defensive/aggressive about being asked questions, it says a lot about their positions/beliefs.
And now just telling blatant lies. It says a lot.you still haven't added anything to any discussion in this thread .
And now just telling blatant lies. It says a lot.
I'm still waiting for somebody to give an explanation as to Rep Massie's '28 pages which blew my mind' press conference.
Nobody has even tried to defend Conde Rice's 'nobody could have envisioned a plane attack' comments given that an X-Files spinoff had predicted that precise event and was watched by millions just months before the attacks.
Not only am I adding to this discussion, but the deriders like yourself aren't even trying to respond to my simple questions.
Instead it is all attack, deflect, get angry, etc. Speaks volumes.
I don't think I have even expressed my own views on what happened on 911 on this entire forum
I watched the video and meant to respond yesterday, but got sidetracked. My take was that we can only guess what he read that was shocking but I suspect it implied the attacks were allowed to occur. If it was a completely inside job, then surely that information would be kept secret from everyone. How did he get permission to view those documents?I'm still waiting for somebody to give an explanation as to Rep Massie's '28 pages which blew my mind' press conference.
The X-files is one of many TV series I've not seen. Thanks for posting that. Interesting case of life imitating art. I think most people know better than to trust a politician, especially one from the Bush administration. Planes crashing into buildings is nothing new - the Empire State building was hit in 1945. Not too much of a stretch to imagine an attack of that form.Nobody has even tried to defend Conde Rice's 'nobody could have envisioned a plane attack' comments given that an X-Files spinoff had predicted that precise event and was watched by millions just months before the attacks.
Maybe, but if you have sources of information, feel free to share. There are thousands of websites, most unreliableNot only am I adding to this discussion, but the deriders like yourself aren't even trying to respond to my simple questions.
Instead it is all attack, deflect, get angry, etc. Speaks volumes.
That point we can agree on.At the very least, the honest person has to accept that they were lied to by the US gov.
Who did you want to answer this? Who is "pro-establishment"?Another thing I would like some pro-establishment opinion on.
Lone Gunman pilot episode. Aired several months before 911.
Re-he-heeally?
Who did you ask, what?My foray into ths thread was to ask a few posters, who were at the time dismissing the no-planes theory, how they felt about a few of the more obvious holes in the 911 story.
One of the posters I called out gave a logically fallacious response, the other didn't even respond at all.
Well, that adds to it... :\
That is probably the most valid talking point about 9/11 imo. The talk about the government actually having knowledge and not acting on it fully, that's entirely plausible. Well, more plausible to me than other theories. Whether that's how it went down is another story but there is plenty of talking points in this theory.Well, that adds to it... :\
I've used facts to rebut the poor conspiracy theories.WTF?
I've been on this point for years newbie, and you have contributed what ??
I've no problem with people discussing their opinion on what happened. But if I can provide facts to dispute lies, I will do so!That is probably the most valid talking point about 9/11 imo. The talk about the government actually having knowledge and not acting on it fully, that's entirely plausible. Well, more plausible to me than other theories. Whether that's how it went down is another story but there is plenty of talking points in this theory.
YepI've used facts to rebut the poor conspiracy theories.
Don't attack me. I've done nothing to you.
You posted a derogatory remark, that would lead to off topic discussion, such as this. Your post was ironic.
No you haven't
You have contributed nothing but rubbish
Explain how my point was " ironic " as you said
This makes no sense
I've no problem with people discussing their opinion on what happened. But if I can provide facts to dispute lies, I will do so!
LOLYou haven't refuted anything, all you've done is IGNORED the FACTS and the evidence.
Well he's thrown down the gauntlet SB, time you fessed up and tell us what you really think.The fact is, there's a number of bullshitters in this thread, many claim they know the gov lied, but offer no theory of their own, instead, they bitch and moan about logical and plausible theories that exist, including my own theory.
Every stupid question that these disingenuous individuals have asked has been answered/accounted for, yet they're still here to pollute the thread with an endless stream of idiocy.....so how about you put forth your own theories as to what happened or stop pretending you doubt the gov.
all you've done is IGNORED the FACTS and the evidence.
Debunked here (start from about 5 mins in):
Hahaha, holy s**t! You're the best!!!You haven't refuted anything, all you've done is IGNORED the FACTS and the evidence.