New rules as of the 1st of August too by the Press Council on what journs can report (making them more accountable I believe)
Lock. Gate. Horse. Bolted.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
New rules as of the 1st of August too by the Press Council on what journs can report (making them more accountable I believe)
It's times like this that I wish LN was still a mod, so I could card you, then he could uncard you, then card you again.
I don't see why this matters. Rawry will be just one of a few hundred offering pledges, I don't think hardie would worry too much if he even knows who he is.
Didn't help others the other individuals - I suppose they don't count.
I'd say they were the architects of the club's sports science department, who's role was to introduce a supplement program. Saying Hird and Corcoran were architects of the actual program is incorrect IMOHird and Corcoran were the architects of the supplement program - To say otherwise is plain silly.
The club always survives in times of adversity - But at some stage the club needs to make a praamatic decision going into the future.
Which is what exactly? You mention the way the club is spending money in court - what's your alternative?
There is no alternative - But we don't give rewards.
So what you're saying is, she's a good Labour man?
Didn't Caro say like under a week ago she'd **** off and leave Hird alone?
Have we actually sacked anyone over this saga since Feb 4 last year, or are you just talking shite?
I don't see why this matters. Rawry will be just one of a few hundred offering pledges, I don't think hardie would worry too much if he even knows who he is.
Where is Corcoran ?
Where is Robson ?
Where is Corcoran ?
Where is Robson ?
I do admire yaco's ability to seamlessly continue about a dozen different conversations at once
I do admire yaco's ability to seamlessly continue about a dozen different conversations at once
Can you find out if the AFL/ASADA target tested players from Melbourne and the GC ? And whether samples were sent off to Germany ?
Absolutely - It's called following the club line.
There is no alternative - But we don't give rewards.
And here in lies the issue of political interference or some may say pay back. AFL were always seen as strong ALP supporters.
The AFL can think what they want. If we didn't cheat, then it is irrelevant.You can't change the way the AFL felt in 2012 - They thought EFC was cheating - There is no other way to say it - Of course they've been proven wrong so far, but it makes sense why the AFL whacked us so hard in 2013. I think the Show Cause notices are the result of political interference - This is a harder issue to resolve in the short term.
Why did they reneg - seems pretty obvious it became public. I'll let you work out the rest.For me the two key questions are
1) Why did ASADA renege on the agreement with the AFL that spared players any doping violations or possible suspensions ? Adhere to this agreement and this would have been over in 2013
2) Why did ASADA issue Show Cause notices ? I look with interest because NOTHING has happened to Cronulla players. Was there political interference ?
Melbourne and GC are not of interest - Cronulla case is the one which is of interest ?
You said in the previous post Hird started the program so bore responsibility. This conversation is based on that premise. So how the lawyers are involved is apparently his fault based on your causation argument.Finally - I made no mention of Hird in my post.