Sim Feature Requests, Suggestions & Bug Reports

Remove this Banner Ad

akkaps said:
Nothing, I understood from what we said was that if contested possessions effect exie scores. I relied stating the contested possessions would only effect SuperCoach scores.
Click to expand...
...Even though there's never been anything like a SuperCoach score in Qooty.

Right.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I'm talking about building contested marks into the sim, the same way the current stats are. Thus giving KPPs higher match scores and a better chance at polling well in the Mobbs Medal.
 
Footypie32 said:
I'm talking about building contested marks into the sim, the same way the current stats are. Thus giving KPPs higher match scores and a better chance at polling well in the Mobbs Medal.
Click to expand...

I think the point that are trying to make Footy is that Contested Marks and Uncontested marks are considered Marks in DT scoring systems, which is what we use. Likewise for Exie.

To change that would mean we move to a more Supercoach scoring type structure, which would require some significant changes.
 
Bengwatkins said:
I think the point that are trying to make Footy is that Contested Marks and Uncontested marks are considered Marks in DT scoring systems, which is what we use. Likewise for Exie.

To change that would mean we move to a more Supercoach scoring type structure, which would require some significant changes.
Click to expand...

I know nothing about programming so I have no idea how much work it would take, but surely you could just change a certain percentage of "marks" to "contested marks" the same way you have two types of disposals. You either kick or you handball. Marks would be even easier because they have no baring on the next play sequence.
 
Footypie32 said:
I know nothing about programming so I have no idea how much work it would take, but surely you could just change a certain percentage of "marks" to "contested marks" the same way you have two types of disposals. You either kick or you handball. Marks would be even easier because they have no baring on the next play sequence.
Click to expand...

Would it be that significant of an increase though? We average what, 7 marks a game?

Hell, I average one mark a game as a FF.
 
Mobbs Medal votes are calculated according to the AFL's Player Ranking. Each type of possession is given a particular score according to where on the ground the possession took place and it's effectiveness. A player can also receive negative points in this calculation. The top three scoters at the end of the game are given the 3-2-1 votes. You can read more about this by going onto the AFL and finding the player rankings PDF.
 
Bengwatkins said:
Would it be that significant of an increase though? We average what, 7 marks a game?

Hell, I average one mark a game as a FF.
Click to expand...

Well assuming a mark was worth 2 points and a contested mark 4 points. You may have 4 uncontested marks and 3 contested, giving you 20 points instead of 14 under the current system. You could make contested marks worth even more if people wanted.

This is just an idea. If it's too hard or people don't like I'll just forget about it. No biggie. Just trying to increase the fun for KPPs.
 
akkaps said:
Mobbs Medal votes are calculated according to the AFL's Player Ranking. Each type of possession is given a particular score according to where on the ground the possession took place and it's effectiveness. A player can also receive negative points in this calculation. The top three scoters at the end of the game are given the 3-2-1 votes. You can read more about this by going onto the AFL and finding the player rankings PDF.
Click to expand...

So you're kind of saying we already have this?
 
Footypie32 said:
Well assuming a mark was worth 2 points and a contested mark 4 points. You may have 4 uncontested marks and 3 contested, giving you 20 points instead of 14 under the current system. You could make contested marks worth even more if people wanted.

This is just an idea. If it's too hard or people don't like I'll just forget about it. No biggie. Just trying to increase the fun for KPPs.
Click to expand...

Id like to just mark it more imo. 90% of my goals come from bringing the ball to ground and swinging my nine iron at it.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Footypie32 said:
So you're kind of saying we already have this?
Click to expand...
Yes. But it does not get tallied up. It would need to be done manually. However it goes into detail about location.

Plus, what the sim gene rates in terms of this would not be posted as would reveal who the Mobbs Medal winner is before hand.
 
Footypie32 said:
I'm talking about building contested marks into the sim, the same way the current stats are. Thus giving KPPs higher match scores and a better chance at polling well in the Mobbs Medal.
Click to expand...
Contested marks are already in the sim, for example:
Logger said:
1 : 10.46 {rW} - Fred outbodies Footypie32 and takes a brilliant mark.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure whether the sim gives them any greater weight than uncontested marks, however.

akkaps said:
Mobbs Medal votes are calculated according to the AFL's Player Ranking. Each type of possession is given a particular score according to where on the ground the possession took place and it's effectiveness. A player can also receive negative points in this calculation. The top three scoters at the end of the game are given the 3-2-1 votes. You can read more about this by going onto the AFL and finding the player rankings PDF.
Click to expand...
No.

For the rest of it, I don't think that location of possession on the ground plays a part, just that some positions are more likely to get votes than others due to their stat-gathering profiles.
 
i think a cool idea is for the sim to add a @ to the start of each name so it automatically tags the players in the post.
 
TheMidRunner said:
Could it be possible Chief could give special permission to the simmer?
Click to expand...

Probably not...Most of us know when the match is on anyway, so we know when to be around for it.

And if you are looking for JUST your own highlights, hit Ctrl+F and search your name.
 
Bengwatkins said:
Probably not...Most of us know when the match is on anyway, so we know when to be around for it.

And if you are looking for JUST your own highlights, hit Ctrl+F and search your name.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I thought just incase somebody forgot, logs on and sees a notification for the game.
 
TheFreshBanana said:
The Brownlow Medal has never been for KPP, so I don't see why the Mobbs should be balanced tbh.
Click to expand...

I agree that it's a midfielders award and I don't expect this would change that anyway. People have complained that KPPs don't get enough of the ball. Doing it this way just means the possessions they do get are valued higher.
 
"Fred outbodies someone and takes the mark", and
"Fred finds some space and takes the mark"
are identical to the sim, just different comments ripped from the same "intended recipient takes the mark" comments file.

Sim has no idea itself that the former is contested, and the latter uncontested.

Unless of course if it has become sentient.
 
Mobbenfuhrer said:
"Fred outbodies someone and takes the mark", and
"Fred finds some space and takes the mark"
are identical to the sim, just different comments ripped from the same "intended recipient takes the mark" comments file.

Sim has no idea itself that the former is contested, and the latter uncontested.

Unless of course if it has become sentient.
Click to expand...

Can we call it Lucy?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top