Certified Legendary Thread Sympathy for *essendon - congratulations on '16 Wooden Spoon (RIP The Scales)

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Aren't we stopping it from going to the tribunal?

TBH I lose track. :(

Nah just to stop the truth from being exposed. The same apparent "truths" *jimmah and *little were once so keen to trumpet to all and sundry once *their opportunity to do so under oath finally arrived.
 
Nah just to stop the truth from being exposed. The same apparent "truths" *jimmah and *little were once so keen to trumpet to all and sundry once *their opportunity to do so under oath finally arrived.
So if essendon lose this court case they go into another court defending themselves against ASADA?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Is the * bloke gone yet?

iqwojm3-1.gif
 
Is the * bloke gone yet?

iqwojm3-1.gif
No, he* keeps reporting back to their* delusion thread, so he's* trolling us from their, in particular wild bill, which is a little gutless. Wish more * posters were like jab*, at least we know what he's* on about.
 
Yep. Only two kinds of decent * posters:

1) Jab
2) Delusional idiots that we can laugh at and ridicule
There's a few good * posters and sometimes lance* accepts logic, but most are a bit feral.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

There's only one kind of nmfc posters. See 2 above. And thanks.
ZING!!

As funny as a peptide induced cancer that someone is taking full responsibility for.
 
Last edited:
Very interesting article from Roy Masters in today's Age.

"A compelling 30-page document, including an appendix of exhibits, was presented to past and present Cronulla players before their final admissions of the use of banned supplements.

The material, shown players by Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority lawyers, undermines the view that the evidence against NRL players was very weak and they were stampeded into accepting guilt."


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...aking-deal-20140827-1091y4.html#ixzz3BebJal4o

Maybe some *essendon players might now just be regretting not taking the AFL's 6 month offer?

But *they would know better wouldn't *they.
 
Very interesting article from Roy Masters in today's Age.

"A compelling 30-page document, including an appendix of exhibits, was presented to past and present Cronulla players before their final admissions of the use of banned supplements.

The material, shown players by Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority lawyers, undermines the view that the evidence against NRL players was very weak and they were stampeded into accepting guilt."


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...aking-deal-20140827-1091y4.html#ixzz3BebJal4o

Maybe some *essendon players might now just be regretting not taking the AFL's 6 month offer?

But *they would know better wouldn't *they.
Jimmy's* not the messiah, he's* just a very naughty boy*.
 
So if essendon lose this court case they go into another court defending themselves against ASADA?

Semantics. What *essendon are doing is desparately attempting to ensure the truth doesn't see the light of day on a technicality, despite earlier shouting to all who'd listen that the truth will set *them free.
 
Very interesting article from Roy Masters in today's Age.

"A compelling 30-page document, including an appendix of exhibits, was presented to past and present Cronulla players before their final admissions of the use of banned supplements.

The material, shown players by Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority lawyers, undermines the view that the evidence against NRL players was very weak and they were stampeded into accepting guilt."


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...aking-deal-20140827-1091y4.html#ixzz3BebJal4o

Maybe some *essendon players might now just be regretting not taking the AFL's 6 month offer?

But *they would know better wouldn't *they.
I would have thought the fact they didn't do the same for Essendon players would lead to the exact opposite conclusion you've just drawn, personally
 
Semantics. What *essendon are doing is desparately attempting to ensure the truth doesn't see the light of day on a technicality, despite earlier shouting to all who'd listen that the truth will set *them free.
So they are not preventing it going to court?
 
Maybe some *essendon players might now just be regretting not taking the AFL's 6 month offer?

But *they would know better wouldn't *they.

The deluded asshats from up the road seem to think that every compelling piece of evidence against NRL players and especially Stephen Dank is further proof that he was probably using those inconvenient invoices and receipts to steal from * to juice up the NRL players. Forget the fact that Dank was working with the NRL club one year before he began his * mischief.

In reality, * has depended upon Dank's claims that nothing illegal was ever given to * players. So in acknowledging his dubious character and dodgy activities in NSW, they are forced to admit that their defence is based on probably lies.
 
So they are not preventing it going to court?

It's a bizarre case of * saying we've done nothing wrong but the only way they can prove it is to allow the ASADA process to proceed but instead they are saying we don't like the evidence ASADA collected with the AFL so * and *Albert have taken ASADA to court to try and derail the whole process.

Bizarre behaviour if they've done nothing wrong...

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top