We should pay then all 500k a year so we can finish 10 and below again.Thanks for ur input, it's great how you mentioned how poorly we've been going for the 50tg time within a week
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
We should pay then all 500k a year so we can finish 10 and below again.Thanks for ur input, it's great how you mentioned how poorly we've been going for the 50tg time within a week
because he's on a front ended contact. Please do some researchSo what? Frawley is UFA because he's not top bracket either, but Melbourne could pick up a first rounder for him. It's not about what they're earning now, it's about what they're leaving for.
And Young is on nowhere near $400k per year, so it's a poor comparison.
But the AFL does not look at how much he was on 4 years ago when they are handing out compo picksbecause he's on a front ended contact. Please do some research
Agreed but the figures mooted are similar when comparing Goldy and Young. Frawley will be around 700K per year for mine, close to double.
Surely Frawley is worth nothing like 750KFrawley doesn't mean double cost. You'd subtract Frawley's cost from Goldy's cost. If Goldy wants 400k p.a. then a 750k Frawley costs 350k in terms of wage difference.
Time will tell my manBut the AFL does not look at how much he was on 4 years ago when they are handing out compo picks
Surely Frawley is worth nothing like 750K
Goldsack is remembered for one goal in his whole career. Apart from that he "filling a role."Can't remember one game where he dominated, what I can remember is a lot of critics slagging him off...so, Goldsack, don't let the door hit your arse on the way out !
Goldsack is remembered for one goal in his whole career. Apart from that he "filling a role."
Not good enough. Trade.
"Trade" doesnt appear to be an option. He may leave as a free agent, or he may choose to stay. These are the options.
Cunning plan isn't it? We've played it beautifully.People are still mentioning James Frawley. Everything being said by Collingwood says that this is not going to happen. It would completely compromise the plan of drafting young players while using more mature recruits looking for an opportunity to prove themselves. Frawley is looking for money and a premiership. This is a complete mismatch to the club's situation. I will eat my shorts if he comes on board...
I know that. Still irrelevant to compensation.because he's on a front ended contact. Please do some research
Can be resigned and traded.
Frawley doesn't mean double cost. You'd subtract Frawley's cost from Goldy's cost. If Goldy wants 400k p.a. then a 750k Frawley costs 350k in terms of wage difference.
Neither do weplease keep him
DO NOT WANT.
I guess my question to you would be: How would you know?Seriously, Goldsack isn't a footballer's arsehole.
I don't understand the Goldsack hate, what do people expect from him, to be an All Australian? Kick 30 goals?
He is a role player and is worth around the 350 000 mark and I would be happy if we could keep him if not he is a pretty decent loss. Or let's just get another 18 year old to replace him and we will see how competitive we will be next season with a team full of kids.