Damian Barrett

Remove this Banner Ad

His avi on Twitter is what annoys me most about Barrett for some reason, makes him look like a pretentious, psuedo-intellect, running around as a footy journo.

He is a bit precious as well, think he's blocked more trolls then any other footy reporter, bar Ralphy.
 
I absolutely hate, hate, hate, hate Sliding Doors.

Late last season he had one like this

IF

Nathan Buckley continues to give Brody Grundy the number one ruck duties

THAN

He will be an All-Australian within 2 years

Shows that he has no Idea
 
***FLOG ALERT... REPEAT FLOG ALERT***

Adelaide you're a footballer and you own a cat and it vomits in your car... ...of course it compels you to do 96kmh in a 60kmh zone. Silly you
 

Log in to remove this ad.

His avi on Twitter is what annoys me most about Barrett for some reason, makes him look like a pretentious, psuedo-intellect, running around as a footy journo.

He is a bit precious as well, think he's blocked more trolls then any other footy reporter, bar Ralphy.
Is that the glasses frame one? Yeah, shits me too. It's like he's saying "lookie me lookie me I have glasses that must mean I'm smarter than you".
 
Just a bump...Barrett's anti-Melbourne agenda.

Now I know we've been down and out for awhile...but the way he talks about the club is nowhere near neutral by any stretch.

He's the only person to suggest Mitch Clark won't be in red and blue next year.

His comments in the Melbourne 'wash-up' video are just stupid. Talks about Dom Tyson only having 'one good year' but then in the next breath says Josh Kelly is going to be a superstar...well Tyson could be too. Then when it comes to Nathan Jones he talks about Jones having 'played through adversity'. When challenged by Lyon about what this adversity was Barrett replies: "He plays for Melbourne!"

It's just disgusting, shithouse barracking from a numbskull and the fact he's one of the 'number one journos' is mind-boggling.
 
How long has Dom Tyson been around? Isn't this his second year? One good year is a pretty decent effort at this stage of his career.
 
How long has Dom Tyson been around? Isn't this his second year? One good year is a pretty decent effort at this stage of his career.
Third. Been injured his first two though.
 
As much as Robbo and Connolly have been Pro James Hird and Essendon. Warrior and Caro have been steadfast at the polar opposite of the scale.
You can say what you like, they have been proven right and the other two notables wrong.
Very bad look for Robbo in particular

Given your post here and in the Robbo thread, I don't think you understand what today's case was about.
 
As much as Robbo and Connolly have been Pro James Hird and Essendon. Warrior and Caro have been steadfast at the polar opposite of the scale.
You can say what you like, they have been proven right and the other two notables wrong.
Very bad look for Robbo in particular

I challenge you to post the above on the Robbo thread, I posted something similar and got banned for a week.
 
I challenge you to post the above on the Robbo thread, I posted something similar and got banned for a week.
The Robbo thread is an ironic thread. It is a tribute to his stupidity as well as his mannerisms, you can go in there and abuse Robbo but you have to do it in a way that makes it ironic.
If you read the the Cult Of Robbo posts, he is mercilessly sledged but it is done in a way that it appears he is a cult leader and is able to get away with it.
Understand the irony.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Just a bump...Barrett's anti-Melbourne agenda.

Now I know we've been down and out for awhile...but the way he talks about the club is nowhere near neutral by any stretch.

He's the only person to suggest Mitch Clark won't be in red and blue next year.

His comments in the Melbourne 'wash-up' video are just stupid. Talks about Dom Tyson only having 'one good year' but then in the next breath says Josh Kelly is going to be a superstar...well Tyson could be too. Then when it comes to Nathan Jones he talks about Jones having 'played through adversity'. When challenged by Lyon about what this adversity was Barrett replies: "He plays for Melbourne!"

It's just disgusting, shithouse barracking from a numbskull and the fact he's one of the 'number one journos' is mind-boggling.
Seems pretty spot on.
 
What's Damian Barrett got to do with Mark Robinson, except for disliking each other. This is a thread to discuss Damian Barrett. At least purple has got an elongated 15 minutes of fame in the last two years. Good for a media communications specialist.
 
Its funny how we associate wearing glasses to being smart yet if someone is wearing a hearing aid, its like, o your disabled.
its fine for people to wear glasses, but its those stupid large black framed glasses that people wear nowadays in an attempt to look intellectual & fashionable, that is the problem with people wearing glasses.
 
its fine for people to wear glasses, but its those stupid large black framed glasses that people wear nowadays in an attempt to look intellectual & fashionable, that is the problem with people wearing glasses.


Of course there is nothing wrong with wearing glasses but people seem to view them differently than they do hearing aids when they are both disability aids.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top