You may get nothing at all for him yet either.It's such a odd situation.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No he can'tRyder can walk out the door and i doubt the AFL is gonna stand in his way after the attitude of the EFC over the past 2 years, it would take a miracle for the grievance tribunal to go against his wishes.
Ryder can walk out the door and i doubt the AFL is gonna stand in his way after the attitude of the EFC over the past 2 years, it would take a miracle for the grievance tribunal to go against his wishes.
You may get nothing at all for him yet either.It's such a odd situation.
What attitude of the EFC?Ryder can walk out the door and i doubt the AFL is gonna stand in his way after the attitude of the EFC over the past 2 years, it would take a miracle for the grievance tribunal to go against his wishes.
You may get nothing at all for him yet either.It's such a odd situation.
God I hope he isn't linked with Norf nextgreat so now we have to deal with a steady stream of Port flogs this time telling us how we have to accept their stale chips or lose him for nothing?
Check our trade history, that's what you'll be dealing with dealing with Port Adelaide, we won't split the group up
aaaaaaand you've already topped it.Post of the year material right there. BTW two Paddy Ryders are not worth one Wingard.
It's fun isn't it? * I can't wait for an answer to this, one way or the other. Actually, that last sentence sounds very familiar...great so now we have to deal with a steady stream of Port flogs this time telling us how we have to accept their stale chips or lose him for nothing?
Ryder can walk out the door and i doubt the AFL is gonna stand in his way after the attitude of the EFC over the past 2 years, it would take a miracle for the grievance tribunal to go against his wishes.
You may get nothing at all for him yet either.It's such a odd situation.
Could be because your club said that if any player wanted to leave because of the supplements program they wouldn't stand in their way.
Then you shouldn't get Ryder. We should be stubborn in this situation. It's more than just about Paddy's welfare. There's no reason that we can't provide the personal support he needs especially amongst his mates at the club who seem to respect him. If we let him go for peanuts however, it destroys the integrity of contractual agreements, opens a precedent for other players to take advantage of our generous nature, sets us back in pursuit of a flag, and frays the fabric of our club. He is CONTRACTED. You'll give us what we want or you don't get him.Check our trade history, that's what you'll be dealing with dealing with Port Adelaide, we won't split the group up
Facepalm giflol both are exaggeration but does anyone seriously in their right mind think you can get someone like Wingard for Ryder?
Anyway if the Bombers don't get penalized on Friday (which hopefully they don't) does that mean Ryder doesn't have the option to opt out of his contract?
Fair enough if a player is coming out of contract, or if a contracted player tries to renegotiate in the silly season. But bringing this s**t up in the season whilst contracted? I want this mentally weak ***** out the club.Richmond fans fell back in love with Martin pretty quickly. The fences can be mended very easily. I think the current circus says much less about Ryder and much more about where the game is going in general.
We are going to see a lot more contracted players (from all clubs) playing the field in coming years.
* me, how can so called media get it so wrongABC just released a news story re: Port
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-09-17/port-aims-to-lure-ryder-from-essendon/5750844?section=sport
For example if I were Essendon, I'd be asking for one of:Yeah that post is a shocker.
Sorry to repeat others here, but if you're chasing a player that's in the top 6 best players at their current club, and he's contracted for a further two years, you're gonna have to cough up more than a player in the 26-30 range of the pecking order.
It has to be a player within the top 10, or a very high draft pick and a player in the top 10-15.
im not really interested in Ryder anyway, but at the end of the day if he wants to walk i think the club will pretty much take what they get from any club in the trade period to avoid him going the the grievance tribunal, i think the AFL would be encouraging Essendon to make a trade or risk loosing him for nothing
Do people still think that the judge is handing down a guilty/not guilty verdict on the 'saga'? Have they not been listening?
Post of the year material right there. BTW two Paddy Ryders are not worth one Wingard.