jenny61_99
Premium Platinum
yep absolutely 100%. And you can't say otherwise.
-
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Essendon players ready to listen to ASADA deal offers
- Thread starter dmc333
- Start date
- Tagged users None
If Asada shows evidence before they legally have to and the players reject it then can the players then go to court and say Asada did not follow the procedure( nothing surprises me any more in this saga)
Essendon players determined not to accept guilty verdict
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/spo...t-guilty-verdict/story-fnca0u4y-1227067062368
Good. Let it play out. No more talk of deals.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/spo...t-guilty-verdict/story-fnca0u4y-1227067062368
Good. Let it play out. No more talk of deals.
No need for asada to show evidence and compromise there position if the story is true
Sir Hugh Percy
BigFooty Aristocrat
This is the thing, isn't it? Why give your opponent all the ammunition they need to fight you without having taken a shot at them first? If there's a deal, then deal, i.e. give and take, compromise. Don't whine for something for nothing; particularly when you have no intention of using it in good faith.
You can look at it another way though, if your case is watertight, why not show them their stuffed, come in and tell us what you know.
WE WANT HIRD
From my understanding ASADA don't need to give them much at all, but they are going show them SOME of the evidence And that could be the bits the players could have got from the court case
- Jun 28, 2013
- 31,824
- 48,043
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Of course they want Hird. I agree. Deals to get the big fish. That's the way these guys roll
- Aug 23, 2011
- 19,104
- 62,068
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Grand Finals at the Gabba
These sort of comments are brain dead. ASADA will show their evidence, once the Bombers have shown cause and they head off to the tribunal they will get to see everything. Essendon could've seen the evidence months ago but they launched legal action that had absolutely no chance of winning.
"Put up or STFU"??
ASADA aren't wandering around beating their chest. They've followed their process so far without too much fuss. Essendon are the one that are huffing and puffing by calling for court cases and demanding to see evidence when we're not at that stage of the process yet.
Last edited:
The classic martial arts scenario. In order to gain supremacy, allow your opponent to attack first. Essendon have thrown the first punch, now they are going down.
Chip getting back to work in predictable fashion.
Neil Young QC has already told them they have good grounds for an appeal but will give a power point presentation to show the board their appeal is watertight to get the go ahead. He just needs a few more months access to Essendon's treasure to pay off his chalet in the Swiss alps so I expect it will be as watertight as a frog's clacker.
Meanwhile, despite the fact that both the club and the players are demanding that ASADA show them the evidence against them, and howlling at the injustice of ASADA not doing so, Chip says that Essendon has the evidence courtesy of the lost court case. And guess what? Its weak and circumstantial.
Which begs so many questions that are not worth answering because as usual it is all a crock. I now honestly think Robbo is a better journalist. He is out of his depth doing serious stuff, but that is not his thing anyway, whereas that is all Chip does, yet does it no better than Robbo.
Last edited:
- Aug 23, 2011
- 19,104
- 62,068
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Grand Finals at the Gabba
Adding to this, now ASADA have agreed to provide Essendon with their requests earlier than the process would usually dictate. Yet there are still people out there painting them as some uncooperative, immoral organisation.
They had no requirement whatsoever to had over the evidence at this point, yet they still did. And we've got people telling them to "put up or stfu".
Sir Hugh Percy
BigFooty Aristocrat
I'm okay with all that, but I would think that the players need to show that they're receptive to dealing first. So far all we seem to be hearing is that the players, and particularly the club, have been saying, "Stuff your deals, your process and your whole reason for being. We'll fight you every step of the way and in every court that will hear us. Oh, but can we please see the evidence so we know here we stand?"
- Jun 17, 2014
- 12,875
- 20,383
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- ASADA
Only "parts of the case", so its a bit of, play nice or we have more on you
yep. Let's test the evidence once and for all. * the appeal off, let's get this show on the road
yeah, most of us would have no idea what the players are going through, but i bet there are people around them giving them advice on what they should do.
Like a few have said on here, once one decides enough, more will follow
Has Dr Peter Harcourt of the AFL ever injected a player?
Not quite.
ASADA would then proceed to make a decision on Infraction Notices without the benefit of player input. There is no benefit to the players in ignoring the SCNs
tesla1962
Premiership Player
Baldur, another view to the one that you and IanW hold
http://www.brianralexander.com/Images/WarOnDrugs.pdf
Last edited:
I cannot see the relevance of your link to my post. The author that regards WADA as some sort of out of control Frankenstein monster. This does not disagree with IanW's post about WADA perhaps taking umbrage at the Federal Court action.
oh yeah they want Dank, but i think they have him by the short and curlies,imo Hird is the one they want the most, he is the petrol in the tank, a car won't start with no petrol
