Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's said it once, its just posters keep posting the same quote rehashed in multiple different articles. Its not as if coaches in general don't have good form when it comes to changing their stance on "I don't want to coach" type comments. Alan Richardson categorically ruled out coaching the Saints, claiming he was committed to the Power. Roo's was quoted multiple times saying he didn't want to coach Melbourne. I'm pretty sure Bomber Thompson said he didn't want to stand in for Hird. Blight was never going to coach again after the Crows.
Coaches change their minds regularly and I suspect its often a case of simply offering an extra $100k a year, or in Worsfolds case my feeling is that its a Senior Assistants role, with very good money but less stress, as opposed to the senior coaches role.
Please be bicks on the unlikely endClarkson is as likely as Bickley... Different ends of the spectre though
If we can prove exceptional circumstances, the payout money to Sando doesn't have to go under the cap amount for next year..
In 2015 the tax for breaking the cap is 37.5%, in 2016 it will be 75%..
Are we talking about Worsfold?what AFL level?1
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport...ry-tax-territory/story-fnia3xzy-1227064731655Maybe we will do a Freo and nab someone right off the radar.
I don't even think it needs to be exceptional circumstances ... for instance, provisions in the contract would be enough.
But yesterday the AFL confirmed Adelaide would have the chance to convince the league that Sanderson’s payout should not be included in their football department spend for next year because of “exceptional circumstance”.
Fair call, my point is can a cashed up club make a ridiculous offer to the best coach in the country?
Not sure he's in any shape to be coaching anyone?Forward coach: Darren Jarman
That might be part of what they use to fight for it to be under exceptional circumstances..I saw that, but there was follow up commentary that suggested if we were just executing a clause in the existing contract to terminate Sando, then there was no issue.
Coaches can be fat.Not sure he's in any shape to be coaching anyone?
If we can prove exceptional circumstances, the payout money to Sando doesn't have to go under the cap amount for next year..
In 2015 the tax for breaking the cap is 37.5%, in 2016 it will be 75%..
That article actually had some figures too:It's also worth noting that over the past few years our football dept spend has been amongst the lowest in the AFL.
I think one of the main reasons this cap has come in is because the clubs with the higher dept spend, haven't necessarily been those with the equivalent wealth/income/performance.
Not sure he's in any shape to be coaching anyone?
Brisbane made a big thing about how ruthless they were last year, they made the tough calls and Voss had to go. They we're going to land their big fish
But like the amateur ****s that they were, they just looked incompetent. A board challenge came cause they were so ******* stupid about it.
Talked tough but didn't have the fish in the bag.
Please God don't let this be true of us too.
Fair call, my point is can a cashed up club make a ridiculous offer to the best coach in the country?
Not sure he's in any shape to be coaching anyone?
Yep, Roo said the other morning he wasn't 100% sure but more like 110% sure it had to happen..It will only be true of us if we sacked Sando because we had identified and considered that we already had our replacement. I still reckon there's a good chance that the direction Sando was going was so awful that we had to put a stop to it. Sando said that they were already well advanced in 2015 planning, so was shocked to find out he didn't have a job. I'm more than comfortable with Sando getting sacked purely because he's incapable of taking us anywhere. If the next coach is equally as poor, then they can get moved on after 3 years as well. But keeping him on because we don't have a premium replacement already in the bag is treading the same path to nowhere that we've been on the last few years.
Not to mention he hasn't been sober since the 97 gf.
A) It would be nice to be able to SHOW someone techniques rather than try and explain it. Some people need the visual.I don't see what that has to do with anything. His mind works fine, he won't be playing the game.
I'm sure there will be ways around it. I think there would be less issues with paying it out this year than there will be in the future, If a clubs under the cap (like we are now since there is none) I don't see why they cant include the payout in that years cap.
A) It would be nice to be able to SHOW someone techniques rather than try and explain it. Some people need the visual.
B) You can't teach freak.