- Banned
- #37,026
Let's hope they allow this. Methinks that 'everyone' seems keen to get this back into the AFL sphere and back into a tribunal.
Will be interesting to see the outcome.. but I note they mention that SCN's were originally issued in June and have been delayed through 'no fault of the players'.. perhaps setting up a 'backdated' defence IF the worst should occur.
Either way.. it will be good to wrap this up in the off-season and get some clarity about where it all sits.
TBH.. sounds like the players lawyers aren't worried in the slightest.. otherwise I'm sure deals would have been done by now.
Will be interesting to see the outcome.. but I note they mention that SCN's were originally issued in June and have been delayed through 'no fault of the players'.. perhaps setting up a 'backdated' defence IF the worst should occur.
Either way.. it will be good to wrap this up in the off-season and get some clarity about where it all sits.
TBH.. sounds like the players lawyers aren't worried in the slightest.. otherwise I'm sure deals would have been done by now.