Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To be interviewed for GC job according to Mark Stevens.
According to Stevens, Eade is the favoured option at GC.
Please get the job Rocket.
Assuming he does leave (and that he actually does something at Collingwood) , would this be a good excuse to get "Sando" in as part of the footy department , or is that just making it too much more of a "boys club" , given his closeness to Bucks.
To be interviewed for GC job according to Mark Stevens.
According to Stevens, Eade is the favoured option at GC.
Please get the job Rocket.
What does he do again?Good on him, hope he gets the job, has served us well really, I don't think it matters if he gets the gig or not.
The question I guess is who replaces him in that role if he does leave?
Was announced his assistant coach at Essendon yesterday I thinkYep, was tricky working out what Rocket did for us. Wonder what BomberT is up to....
Bomber is collateral damage, should have got Voss, what about Gary Ayres?Pass on Sando, he and Bucks would just be comparing biceps all the time. Let's get aggressive and go get Bomber.
I think it's more a running joke in here more than anything. I'd say it stems from having previous coaching roles that were very public to now being more behind the scenes and administrative that we think he doesn't do much.Rocket has Geoff Walsh's old job, head of football. He does a lot. I really don't understand why people think he does nothing.
Was announced his assistant coach at Essendon yesterday I think
Actually, think it was Harvey *edit
I have nothing to base this on, but I just can't see Bomber and Bucks getting on. Like I said, it's more just a gut looking at both personality traits.Yeah - no confirmation on Bomber , although he has softened his stance on not wanting to be an assistant. I have a hard time getting a handle on the guy - an erratic personality to say the least. Can't argue with his success though - having said that he was at Geelong for about twice as long as Bucks has been at the helm before he tasted success. And then there's Mighty Mick .....both successes after being given much longer than the average run .
Anyway........it sounds like we'd be creating a new position here or another senior assistant if we go after Bomber (or do we want him as head of football?) - in any case whoever it is should be a good man manager and tactician as support to Bucks .
Bomber is collateral damage, should have got Voss, what about Gary Ayres?
Bomber is collateral damage, should have got Voss, what about Gary Ayres?
I have nothing to base this on, but I just can't see Bomber and Bucks getting on. Like I said, it's more just a gut looking at both personality traits.
I'd like Cameron Ling at Collingwood I think. He's just left NM hasn't he
Just mean with ASADA hanging over his head there would be some risk in bringing him in, knowing our luck it would derail our season. I think we definitely need someone with some presence, I don't think Bucks is a good bad cop role where if we get someone in to provide that I can see us getting a ruthless edge in again.Dunno what you mean by collateral damage. Voss ? no, no, no and I repeat, no. Now Gary Ayres would have Bucks a little concerned wouldn't he ? You could argue Ayres is better qualified for the job than Nathan...
Neither really float my boat, was it Laidley though that everybody raved about as having one of the best footy brains in the business?Any love for Mark Williams? Although he may have burnt his bridges with us.
Other guy i don't mind is Dean Laidley. Not sure what he is doing now.
Ayres also an option.
Straight swap, Eade out, Bluey in, fair enough.Neither really float my boat, was it Laidley though that everybody raved about as having one of the best footy brains in the business?
What about Guy McKenna - would take Bluey back in?