Show Cause Notices v2.0 sent out by ASADA

[jatz14]

BS the club has been protecting the players since the story first broke not once have they left them in the dark.

From my perspective, the club has been protecting itself in the guise of protecting the players since the story broke

 

[BOMBERS 4 LIFE!!!!]

Is that why they waited 5 months to initiate a consent form for supplements used? Because they've been protecting the players all along?

The consent forms were put in place because the players had doubts and wanted reassurance from the club that what they were taking was legal and safe.

 

[FuManchu]

The consent forms were put in place because the players had doubts and wanted reassurance from the club that what they were taking was legal and safe.

Did they take their doubts to ASADA?

 

[BOMBERS 4 LIFE!!!!]

Did they take their doubts to ASADA?

Didn't need to.

 

[Ron The Bear]

But it's ok for the players to be dragged through the mud for 2 years.

If only your club had behaved responsibly and kept records...

 

[FuManchu]

Didn't need to.

It seems they did. After all, if you have concerns enough to have a consent form created because you have doubts about what you are been injected with as an athlete, then you have potential wada issues too.

 

[Boston tiger]

Who actually says guilty or not guilty?

 

[Ron The Bear]

Ben McDevitt responds to AFLPA statement today (sorry if this is the wrong thread)

http://asada.gov.au/media/organised_crime_and_drugs_in_sport.html

"In my role as protector of clean athletes..."

Take that, you dirty Bombers.

 

[HoopsAhoy]

The consent forms were put in place because the players had doubts and wanted reassurance from the club that what they were taking was legal and safe.

That's not the way consent forms work. You sign them prior to any treatment.

If you do it months later after treatment has commenced then it stinks of people trying to cover their arse.

 

[Graffy4242]

Didn't need to.

Boy that's worked out well for them.

 

[AM]

But it's ok for the players to be dragged through the mud for 2 years.

Deflection is never a productive defence.

 

[RightYouAreThen]

Who actually says guilty or not guilty?

Eddie MacGuire

 

[FuManchu]

Eddie MacGuire

He'd have them not guilty

 

[Art Corvelay]

Didn't need to.

Bullshit.

 

[replicant]

Eddie MacGuire

Hope not. If it's him, he'll find Essendon guilty and the punishment will be Sydney banned for 2 years. And Beams back to Collingwood.

 

[FuManchu]

Hope not. If it's him, he'll find Essendon guilty and the punishment will be Sydney banned for 2 years. And Beams back to Collingwood.

That ban was more Fitzpatrick than anyone else.


And we don't wont Ol' strike 2 back

 

[Xtreme]

Who actually says guilty or not guilty?

Caro!

 

[BlueWorld]

The consent forms were put in place because the players had doubts and wanted reassurance from the club that what they were taking was legal and safe.

After having the injections for 5 months. It suddenly occurred to them after all that time they better check if what they had done all that time was OK.

 

[BlueWorld]

Didn't need to.

Why?

 

[Boston tiger]

Who actually says guilty or not guilty?

Ok is it like this? Asada says there is a case to answer and then it goes to a group of people and they decide if guilty or not and then it goes to the AFL for sentencing or does the AFL do the guilty not guilty aswell?

 

[FuManchu]

After having the injections for 5 months. Took them all that time.

You can't rush these things

 

[Spongebob]

After having the injections for 5 months. It suddenly occurred to them after all that time they better check if what they had done all that time was OK.

the cerebrolysin takes a while to improve the cognitive acuity of the players

 

[PetterdHoisted]

But it's ok for the players to be dragged through the mud for 2 years.

As Demetriou likes to say, the AFL and ASADA never injected anyone.

Reasonably significant misstep from AFLPA/EFC lawyers here. All the momentum from the '34 players standing firm' headline vaporised by pushing the wrong body to expedite!

McDevitt gets to explain ASADA have no remit to do that, and at the same time deliver some beautifully aimed whacks.

 

[HoopsAhoy]

Ok is it like this? Asada says there is a case to answer and then it goes to a group of people and they decide if guilty or not and then it goes to the AFL for sentencing or does the AFL do the guilty not guilty aswell?

Here you go...

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...ndon-supplements-scandal-20141023-11akoy.html

 

[FuManchu]

As Demetriou likes to say, the AFL and ASADA never injected anyone.

Reasonably significant misstep from AFLPA/EFC lawyers here. All the momentum from the '34 players standing firm' headline vaporised by pushing the wrong body to expedite!

McDevitt gets to explain ASADA have no remit to do that, and at the same time deliver some beautifully aimed whacks.

It was poetry