ManWithNoName
TheBrownDog
I think there'd be very few of us that weren't outraged at his selection at some point.I'll put my hand up for this one.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think there'd be very few of us that weren't outraged at his selection at some point.I'll put my hand up for this one.
Honestly, what the **** is that ad for the ODIs between New Zealand & South Africa?
Me 2, assumed he would get found out due to not having a real cricket shot in his kit bag or a defensive shot to fall back on. Happy to see 2 openers willing to work hard on their games to improve.I'll put my hand up for this one.
Tell me why Pakistan needed to go at 2 runs an over all day yesterday!
it might have been boring but it was effective
good on them for making it hard for the aussies
Tell me why Pakistan needed to go at 2 runs an over all day yesterday!
it might have been boring but it was effective
good on them for making it hard for the aussies
Remember when everyone freaked at the idea of Warner playing Test cricket.
Don't agree in the least to be honest, a far more rounded player than someone like Shane Watson. He's shown a willingness to leave balls and rotate the strike when required, it's just that he misses absolutely no bad ball. He's a busy, attacking player but he has a solid underlying technique, a good defense and a rational head on his shoulders in much the same way that Gilchrist was. It's too easy to simply look at his strike rate and pigeon hole him as a mindless AfridiI wonder if sides will start to adjust to Warner in terms of setting fields. I would set more of an ODI field to him straight away try to take away his boundaries. He is suited to test cricket in this regard because anything that beats the field is usually four. He has actually struggled a bit in ODIs and I think it's because he only has one tempo.
as cricinfo reminds me Rogers has his cowan
what is a cowan?