Don't pick this guy then whole recruiting department should leave
I like Petracca , but I also have some faith in our recruiting department. ( more so than you ,.... no offense ) However if it was 2006 I think I'd have more faith in you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't pick this guy then whole recruiting department should leave
If Markworth can shake the injuries and get out on the field it will be like an extra draft pick this yr.Newton actually sounds a bit like Markworth - a very talented player who's development and potential have been delayed by serious injury.
See I reckon the key word is delisted. Roberton was definitely offered a contract in Oct 2012, but he was delisted when he walked back to Vic.Because he rejected a contract i think he can only enter the drafts not available to sign anywhere under DFA.
Well we did say the other day (I think it was Baines) that if we traded pick 1 we believed we would still be able to get whoever we would have taken at pick 1 with pick 4 (if we traded 1 for 4 and extras).If we don't take Petracca he'll go number 2.
If we don't take Mcartin he could drop to 4.
For you guys who follow the kids a bit closer than some of us.Definitely using pick 41 along with 1, 21 and 22 which isn't surprising but good chat here with Elshaug: http://www.saints.com.au/video/2014-10-24/draft-insider-tony-elshaug-drafthub
I like Petracca , but I also have some faith in our recruiting department. ( more so than you ,.... no offense ) However if it was 2006 I think I'd have more faith in you.
I think the talent is there at 41 as opposed to other years, but regardless when you're picking up someone at that pick you're going to have to put a fair bit of time into developing them.For you guys who follow the kids a bit closer than some of us.
I know we should pick up some very good players with 21 & 22 but with the depth in this yrs draft is 41 pretty hit n miss. Or should that pick up a talented player as well.
2009 was not great either .
Agree that recruiting has been better but will judge our recruiting even more on who they pick 21 22 41 & rookies
If they don't pick CP and he ends up at Melbourne then why go thru charade they could have got 2 Talls in top 10
with trade . I understand club not wanting to announce who they will pick no1 though .
Well we did say the other day (I think it was Baines) that if we traded pick 1 we believed we would still be able to get whoever we would have taken at pick 1 with pick 4 (if we traded 1 for 4 and extras).
The landscape may have changed to a degree with Boyd joining WB. We were loading up to have a big crack at him at the end of next year and may have thought we were a really strong chance, but now that he's contracted for 7 years we may be having a much closer look at Paddy, as there may not be a lot of other strong looking options for us post-Riewoldt. Seeing how much Boyd cost WB we may also be having 2nd thoughts about having a really big crack at Cameron next year, as he could cost squillions, if Boyd is anything to go by!
A lot of it could also come down to the interviews that are going on at the moment and even whether we think we're a good chance of getting McKenzie with 21 or 22, if we reckon there's nothing in it between CP and PM.
I've been on Petracca over McCartin for months though and that is certainly no different now, especially as I'm really warming to the idea of McKenzie at 21 and think he's a decent chance to be available there, so I'm really hoping we go CP at 1 and then jag Reece with 21 or 22.
Just on that do dogs now get the same treatment since they took Griffen over himYou take the best available - that is Petracca. End of story. I'd be disappointed if we didn't...
I honestly think taking McCartin over Petracca will be the same as the Tambling v Buddy situation. And we will be ridiculed like Richmond are....surely we won't??
Dangerfield??What current afl player would Petracca be like?
What current afl player would Petracca be like?
The more I see of him the more I see jab Watson, even how he plays foward reminds me off him, really solid at protecting his space and can waste the ball with some of his kicks.Dangerfield??
If he reaches his potential that is.
The more I see of him the more I see jab Watson, even how he plays foward reminds me off him, really solid at protecting his space and can waste the ball with some of his kicks.
Hopefully he doesn't start his first few years off like jab though or the bust tag will be thrown around
Think Tambling/Buddy was a little different. Rich were just put off Buddy from the many stories floating around about him being a bit of a 'wild child'. Not cos they thought Tambling was better.You take the best available - that is Petracca. End of story. I'd be disappointed if we didn't...
I honestly think taking McCartin over Petracca will be the same as the Tambling v Buddy situation. And we will be ridiculed like Richmond are....surely we won't??
I've been on Petracca over McCartin for months though and that is certainly no different now, especially as I'm really warming to the idea of McKenzie at 21 and think he's a decent chance to be available there, so I'm really hoping we go CP at 1 and then jag Reece with 21 or 22.
Dustin Martin is the one I like to compare him to, a bit like Dangerfield too.