Xfiles News HOLLOW EARTH THEORY

Remove this Banner Ad

And based on your calculations of the;
Theoretical mass of Earth (based on the thickness and content of the hypothetical hollow Earth), remembering that the Earth is also under centripetal force, and is not spherical.

What were your results?

That it's made of some pretty serious s**t.
 
Garavitational force is related to the mass of an object, refer to newtons laws.

we went into the garden, & drank thea under the shade of some appletrees; only he, & my self. amidst other discourse, he told me, he was just in the same situation, as when formerly, the notion of gravitation came into his mind. "why should that apple always descend perpendicularly to the ground," thought he to himself; occasion'd by the fall of an apple, as he sat in a contemplative mood. "why should it not go sideways, or upwards? but constantly to the earths center? assuredly, the reason is, that the earth draws it. there must be a drawing power in matter. & the sum of the drawing power in the matter of the earth must be in the earths center, not in any side of the earth. therefore dos this apple fall perpendicularly, or toward the center. if matter thus draws matter; it must be in proportion of its quantity. therefore the apple draws the earth, as well as the earth draws the apple.

Sir Isaac considered the sum of the planet's drawing power to be in the centre of the planet. So it must be hollow. Except for a sum.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

we went into the garden, & drank thea under the shade of some appletrees; only he, & my self. amidst other discourse, he told me, he was just in the same situation, as when formerly, the notion of gravitation came into his mind. "why should that apple always descend perpendicularly to the ground," thought he to himself; occasion'd by the fall of an apple, as he sat in a contemplative mood. "why should it not go sideways, or upwards? but constantly to the earths center? assuredly, the reason is, that the earth draws it. there must be a drawing power in matter. & the sum of the drawing power in the matter of the earth must be in the earths center, not in any side of the earth. therefore dos this apple fall perpendicularly, or toward the center. if matter thus draws matter; it must be in proportion of its quantity. therefore the apple draws the earth, as well as the earth draws the apple.

Sir Isaac considered the sum of the planet's drawing power to be in the centre of the planet. So it must be hollow. Except for a sum.

the sum of the drawing power as he put it is referring to centre of gravity. Everything had a centre of gravity, you have a centre if gravity, doesn't mean you're hollow.

Interesting that you should quote newton in support of hollow earth, given that he is accredited with debunking it with his work on gravity and his shell theorem.

The quote above refers to the proportionality of mass and gravity. That is something hollow earth can't overcome, gravity is measurable, the volume is measurable, hence the density can be calculated.
 
the sum of the drawing power as he put it is referring to centre of gravity. Everything had a centre of gravity, you have a centre if gravity, doesn't mean you're hollow.

Interesting that you should quote newton in support of hollow earth, given that he is accredited with debunking it with his work on gravity and his shell theorem.

The quote above refers to the proportionality of mass and gravity. That is something hollow earth can't overcome, gravity is measurable, the volume is measurable, hence the density can be calculated.

Don't worry. I'm hollow.

Seriously, I do not think the earth is hollow. Sir Isaac's law of gravity, that's another story. It's a nonsense.
 
Here's the photos that prove it (there is a hole at the North Pole).

hollow2.jpg


I mean, how can anyone explain those?
 
Where are those photos from? The third one looks faker than Hirdy's tan.

The other two look like a hole in the clouds, not the earth.


Of course they are - but they are the kind of things that get shown around the 'Hollow Earth' websites.

The 'Holes in the clouds' are cause by the earth's rotation. Over the poles, you can often get 'round' accumulations of clouds, or sometimes round clear areas. It depends on the winds.

The third one is quite famous - it is in fact a NASA photo. When it first came out (70s or 80s) it created a sensation - 'See! Confirmed by NASA!! The earth is hollow and has secret entrances!!!'.

What it REALLY is, is a mosaic of photos - taken during the day. As it was winter, a portion of the arctic circle was permanently in the dark. So when they stitched together the mosaic of photos, there was a round blank spot at the pole.

More techy details here....
http://moteprime.org/article.php?id=6
 
i'd love to see if someone did the math on the pressure and temps inside of a hollow earth.

from what i understand the russians super deep drill project got just passed 12k's

temps reached 180C
the pressure was so great that rocks took on property's of plastic
pressure was so great that even "water" was being created as oxygen and hydrogen as the atoms were being squeezed together.
 
It was the church that held fast to the flat earth policy. The church murdered scientists (in those days they had no title, they were just inquisitive) who claimed the world was round.

This is a myth. Virtually no one with even a basic education believed in a flat Earth. The debate was between proponents of a heliocentric solar system and a geo-centric universe.
 
This is a myth. Virtually no one with even a basic education believed in a flat Earth. The debate was between proponents of a heliocentric solar system and a geo-centric universe.
No. They believed (the belief was pushed by the church) you could sail off the edge of the earth. Good reason not to explore without church maps....and consent..and cutting them in on the profits..
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

considering 99.9% of the worlds population couldn't read or write for 1700 years, and for that 1700 years the church had monastaries writing, re-writing and burning books, hiding books and artifacts in the bowels of the Vatican, its not too much of a step to concede history has been re-written, changed, and has been changed to suit the 'program'. .
 
considering 99.9% of the worlds population couldn't read or write for 1700 years, and for that 1700 years the church had monastaries writing, re-writing and burning books, hiding books and artifacts in the bowels of the Vatican, its not too much of a step to concede history has been re-written, changed, and has been changed to suit the 'program'. .
If you think the church is the driving force behind the current world system then you seriously don't understand modernity. The rewriting of history around this fact is shown with evidence as being conducted by Enlightenment era philosophers to discredit religion. Your position on this is the one without evidence. Show me one piece of evidence that the Church believed or propagated the belief that the world was flat or that you could fall off the edge. Otherwise it's just a conspiracy theory without even a shred of evidence.
 
No. They believed (the belief was pushed by the church) you could sail off the edge of the earth. Good reason not to explore without church maps....and consent..and cutting them in on the profits..
No. No they did not. Some may have done, but they knew from being able to see ship's masts before the rest of the ship, and sailors could see mountains miles inland before they could see the coastline. And there were other clues ; very few believed in the flat earth.
The history, in this regard, was re-written - most likely in the 19th century.

The Church by and large followed Aristotlean belief in perfect spheres, including the shape of the Earth. Not that it was a major thing to teach, as they focussed on the spiritual. This adversely impacted the first heliocentric models of what we now call the solar system. Those models were far more complex than necessary because they tried to describe orbits in terms of spheres.
 
It was the church that held fast to the flat earth policy. The church murdered scientists (in those days they had no title, they were just inquisitive) who claimed the world was round.

In antiquity, the church told the sheeple that it was through prayer that made the seasons, people had no education, no calendar, and everyone had always to pray (prey) and pay to someone for the seasons change, and that the sun would begin spring and summer again. The church made a LOT on money. Imagine Compound interest for 2000 years....real estate, donations, pillage, rape, murder, conquest, etc, you work it out..

The church STILL control world finance. 7 of the Japanese prime ministers since ww2 have been Catholics.. why?

All Leaders (puppets) from the "FREE WORLD " go to church. Why? Do you? Does anyone you know? Why do the elite go to church to worship?

Do you eat at Domminoes? Google "Legatus" .

Etc, etc, etc....

Whom exactly do you mean when you say "the church". There are many churches.
 
Exciting stuff but wasn't caused from a 'hollow earth'. Water molecules were most likely brought down with the oceanic crust when it sub-ducts.

Like all good conspiracies, the truth lies somewhere between the yays and the nays, but for some reason the actual truth has far less supporters than the extreme positions

(Pessimistic, 2014)
 
Exciting stuff but wasn't caused from a 'hollow earth'. Water molecules were most likely brought down with the oceanic crust when it sub-ducts.

it's not really an "ocean" though, the "water" is basically liquified rock it's not anything special it's long been speculated because you can't have liquid magma without well a liquid which is water.

basically they found a vast sample of a type of rock known as ringwoodite this rock act's like a sponge soaking up vast amounts of "water" as it does it begins to sink further into the mantle as it gets heavier, as it does this the rock becomes dehydrated meaning all the water it has gets rungout like a wet towel.

what usually occurs then is that proper "water H20" cannot form due to heat and pressure instead Hydroxyl Radical (HO) is formed as the molecular bonds in water basically snap. this is the "dehydration zone".

what this test supports is the idea that the melting of the rock can occur much higher in a so called "transition zone" a place where it's hot enough to melt the rock but not too hot that water* cannot form. this is believed to occur "around" areas of fast flowing magma. as such when it melts the higher temps cause the water to rise (probably as steam) and join the water cycle.

the reservoir they "found" is actually rock just with vast amounts of water socked up in it. not all the water can escape so it gets soaked up by the ringwoodite and stays there until it begins to sink and the process repeats itself.

in laymens terms, they found rocks full of water higher up than they thought.

*probably in a gasus form
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top