- Banned
- #126
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
On merit.
Almost certainly actually, but that's been covered in other threads on this board and unrelated to this issueIt's possible that there have been staged shootings in the US but not this.
Yep. If a nutjob was waving a shotgun around, I'd be very scared. If he told me to read this/say that/do cartwheels, I'd do itDo you think a government or agency who plans such a complex event would be so dumb to not edit out someone saying 1 2 3 in the beginning of the video? Would they be so dumb to not hire actors who can't remember their lines? It's pretty clear that is just someone saying when the filming is out to begin. As for the instructions, I think that shows how nervous these people actually are. Especially one woman. Pathetic video.
Were there any tears that time?She has actually cried on TV before a few years ago over the sudden and unexpected death of a mother.
What are you on about?If he's such an expert at spotting liars, perhaps be should become a judge so that no more innocent people ever go to prison
You guys don't find it suspicious that she would learn that news live on air?
Seriously? You don't find it fishy at all? That somebody would inform her of this live on air?
Why do you coincidence theorists instantly resort to laughable exaggerations when challenged?this is the first time in history that a newsreader has ever been informed of news while they were on the air.
Why do you coincidence theorists instantly resort to laughable exaggerations when challenged?
Ask yourself, if this woman was so well-known to channel 7, why did the producer (or whoever handed Natalie the info) give her the info live on air?
How does that make sense to any sane person?
what
You guys don't find it suspicious that she would learn that news live on air?
Seriously? You don't find it fishy at all? That somebody would inform her of this live on air?
Talk about gullible.
Were there any tears that time?
What are you on about?
Jesus.
You want to talk rubbish Buddha? You should be pretty familiar with it... every post of yours is littered with conspiracy theory crap.You want to talk about 'rubbish'?
Let's talk about a guy who had been in the news countless times for 'extremism' somehow not being on a terrorist watchlist.
I mean how absurd does this s**t have to get before you start to question?
And yet here you are reading my every word.You want to talk rubbish Buddha? You should be pretty familiar with it... every post of yours is littered with conspiracy theory crap.
And you're hanging off the every word of this mainstream media as far as I can tell.And yet here you are reading my every word.
Good tv? Utter incompetence by her producers? They probably wanted her to cry to get viewers, which is what they've successfully done.Why do you coincidence theorists instantly resort to laughable exaggerations when challenged?
Ask yourself, if this woman was so well-known to channel 7, why did the producer (or whoever handed Natalie the info) give her the info live on air?
How does that make sense to any sane person?
What am I on about? Take Majak Daw for instance. Rape charge hanging over him, his word against some girl's word. Maybe this "Redsilverj" fellow could interview her and get the truth out, preferably in person but I guess Skype could work. It would be a shame if an innocent man went to prison or a guilty man got away with a serious crimeWhat are you on about?
He's on the money regarding some other topics, unfortunately personal bias is clouding his judgement here IMO.You want to talk rubbish Buddha? You should be pretty familiar with it... every post of yours is littered with conspiracy theory crap.
Exactly, TV is all about ratings. They often make claims or speculate before all the facts are in just to appear ahead of competitors.Good tv? Utter incompetence by her producers? They probably wanted her to cry to get viewers, which is what they've successfully done.